Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 in the beginning in the endless space of awareness i was a word i answered to a name of recognition and memory soon i fell silent in the question of who i am, my own distant shore, my own Lover for there is no other, never was, never will be how can there be two? a me and a not you? and if, in the course of water and my own womb of tranquility, i should meet thee, i shall call upon myself and love thee, My Beloved Ana > Turning The Other Cheek > > When Jesus taught, he used > parables (metaphors) to > address the ineffable shift > in consciousness from personal > to Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > Turning the other cheek > is one of his tough teachings. > He suggested that when someone > strikes you on the cheek, that > you simply turn the other cheek. > > Sounds pretty wimpy, but... > > Metaphorically, turning > the other cheek, could be > seen to mean, that if one > feels personally attacked, > they can know that they are > identified with their personal > separate ego, and not with > The Mind of Christ. > > To turn the other cheek > would be to first recognize > that once they have been graced > with the conscious ability to > put on The Mind of Christ, they > can, when they feel attacked, > simply turn their consciousness > to their nondualistic identity - > where it is impossible to > take anything personally, > because there is no person > as their primary identity. > There is only Christ Consciousness. > > If one feels the "sting" of > personal attack, then for certain, > they have allowed their personal > ego, the false or secondary > self, to slip back into their > primary personal "identity". > > Having felt the sting, they can > use it as a cue, and be snapped > back into their true identity, > their "I-I" as Ramana called it, > their Awakened, Realized, Enlightened > Self, their Mind of Christ. > > Having put on The Mind of Christ, > one "naturally" (being naturally > enlightened) walks in love, and > does not, because they cannot, take > anything personally. They have > died to self and Awakened to > Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > If one simply talks the talk, > does not walk the walk, > and has only learned to "sound" > Awakened, Enlightened and Realized, > then this capacity escapes them. > > Typically the pretenders spend > a lot of time talking about > phenomenon and their personal > "talks" with God, and they > easily feel attacked, because > they consciousness is one of > defense - knowing they are > vunerable to being "found out". > > Tough love, tough gurus, sometimes > will "strike the cheek" of a > student to point out to them > that they are in their ego. > > Slap happy, > > Jeff > > > > > community blog is at > > http://.net/blog/ > > "Love itself is the actual form of God." > > Sri Ramana > > In "Letters from Sri Ramanasramam" by Suri Nagamma > Links > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 are identified with their personal separate ego, and not with The Mind of Christ. To turn the other cheek would be to first recognize that once they have been graced with the conscious ability to put on The Mind of Christ, they can, when they feel attacked, simply turn their consciousness to their nondualistic identity - where it is impossible to take anything personally, because there is no person as their primary identity. There is only Christ Consciousness. If one feels the "sting" of personal attack, then for certain, they have allowed their personal ego, the false or secondary self, to slip back into their primary personal "identity". Having felt the sting, they can use it as a cue, and be snapped back into their true identity, their "I-I" as Ramana called it, their Awakened, Realized, Enlightened Self, their Mind of Christ. Having put on The Mind of Christ, one "naturally" (being naturally enlightened) walks in love, and does not, because they cannot, take anything personally. They have died to self and Awakened to Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. If one simply talks the talk, does not walk the walk, and has only learned to "sound" Awakened, Enlightened and Realized, then this capacity escapes them. Typically the pretenders spend a lot of time talking about phenomenon and their personal "talks" with God, and they easily feel attacked, because they consciousness is one of defense - knowing they are vunerable to being "found out". Tough love, tough gurus, sometimes will "strike the cheek" of a student to point out to them that they are in their ego. Slap happy, Jeff Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 I love the way you phrased your response. I feel strongly that Jesus never intended to establish an "exclusive" club, but rather an openness to Satchitananda by any name - the experiential core of all religions and spiritual traditions - with or without the trappings of theistic language. , Vir Rawlley <redderred wrote: > > This is so true. One must walk the talk. If our path is through Jesus, how wonderful this is, to walk the talk in the over-flowing love of Christ, to be in the universal ocean of Sat - Chit - Ananda in compassionate love for, and of All. > > Jeff Belyea <jeff wrote: Turning The Other Cheek > > When Jesus taught, he used > parables (metaphors) to > address the ineffable shift > in consciousness from personal > to Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > Turning the other cheek > is one of his tough teachings. > He suggested that when someone > strikes you on the cheek, that > you simply turn the other cheek. > > Sounds pretty wimpy, but... > > Metaphorically, turning > the other cheek, could be > seen to mean, that if one > feels personally attacked, > they can know that they are > identified with their personal > separate ego, and not with > The Mind of Christ. > > To turn the other cheek > would be to first recognize > that once they have been graced > with the conscious ability to > put on The Mind of Christ, they > can, when they feel attacked, > simply turn their consciousness > to their nondualistic identity - > where it is impossible to > take anything personally, > because there is no person > as their primary identity. > There is only Christ Consciousness. > > If one feels the "sting" of > personal attack, then for certain, > they have allowed their personal > ego, the false or secondary > self, to slip back into their > primary personal "identity". > > Having felt the sting, they can > use it as a cue, and be snapped > back into their true identity, > their "I-I" as Ramana called it, > their Awakened, Realized, Enlightened > Self, their Mind of Christ. > > Having put on The Mind of Christ, > one "naturally" (being naturally > enlightened) walks in love, and > does not, because they cannot, take > anything personally. They have > died to self and Awakened to > Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > If one simply talks the talk, > does not walk the walk, > and has only learned to "sound" > Awakened, Enlightened and Realized, > then this capacity escapes them. > > Typically the pretenders spend > a lot of time talking about > phenomenon and their personal > "talks" with God, and they > easily feel attacked, because > they consciousness is one of > defense - knowing they are > vunerable to being "found out". > > Tough love, tough gurus, sometimes > will "strike the cheek" of a > student to point out to them > that they are in their ego. > > Slap happy, > > Jeff > > > > > community blog is at > > http://.net/blog/ > > "Love itself is the actual form of God." > > Sri Ramana > > In "Letters from Sri Ramanasramam" by Suri Nagamma > > > > > Ramana maharshi Advaita vedanta Kundalini yoga Hatha yoga Philosophy of education Yoga clothing > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 traditions - with or without the trappings of theistic language. --- In , Vir Rawlley <redderred wrote: > > This is so true. One must walk the talk. If our path is through Jesus, how wonderful this is, to walk the talk in the over-flowing love of Christ, to be in the universal ocean of Sat - Chit - Ananda in compassionate love for, and of All. > > Jeff Belyea <jeff wrote: Turning The Other Cheek > > When Jesus taught, he used > parables (metaphors) to > address the ineffable shift > in consciousness from personal > to Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > Turning the other cheek > is one of his tough teachings. > He suggested that when someone > strikes you on the cheek, that > you simply turn the other cheek. > > Sounds pretty wimpy, but... > > Metaphorically, turning > the other cheek, could be > seen to mean, that if one > feels personally attacked, > they can know that they are > identified with their personal > separate ego, and not with > The Mind of Christ. > > To turn the other cheek > would be to first recognize > that once they have been graced > with the conscious ability to > put on The Mind of Christ, they > can, when they feel attacked, > simply turn their consciousness > to their nondualistic identity - > where it is impossible to > take anything personally, > because there is no person > as their primary identity. > There is only Christ Consciousness. > > If one feels the "sting" of > personal attack, then for certain, > they have allowed their personal > ego, the false or secondary > self, to slip back into their > primary personal "identity". > > Having felt the sting, they can > use it as a cue, and be snapped > back into their true identity, > their "I-I" as Ramana called it, > their Awakened, Realized, Enlightened > Self, their Mind of Christ. > > Having put on The Mind of Christ, > one "naturally" (being naturally > enlightened) walks in love, and > does not, because they cannot, take > anything personally. They have > died to self and Awakened to > Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > If one simply talks the talk, > does not walk the walk, > and has only learned to "sound" > Awakened, Enlightened and Realized, > then this capacity escapes them. > > Typically the pretenders spend > a lot of time talking about > phenomenon and their personal > "talks" with God, and they > easily feel attacked, because > they consciousness is one of > defense - knowing they are > vunerable to being "found out". > > Tough love, tough gurus, sometimes > will "strike the cheek" of a > student to point out to them > that they are in their ego. > > Slap happy, > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > community blog is at > > http://.net/blog/ > > "Love itself is the actual form of God." > > Sri Ramana > > In "Letters from Sri Ramanasramam" by Suri Nagamma > > > > > Ramana maharshi Advaita vedanta Kundalini yoga Hatha yoga Philosophy of education Yoga clothing > > > ! GROUPS LINKS > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Ah, so it is... The body of Christ is the communion of Soul and Spirit on the path of One's life, the mystical marriage of I and Thou. just This.... Ana Thanks Jeff :-) It is of course easier to institutionalise Jesus to a > Church rather than to "Live Christ", akin perhaps to visiting a temple, > lighting insense, bowing down and walking out with a sense of 'godly' > accomplishment. > > Each rung of the 'ladder' (path of sat-chit-ananda) has its purpose, and > each being is on that rung with other like beings till it is time to move > on. Jesus also said, the first will be last and the last will be first, > because every one is already there, since every 'rung' is after all Jesus. > > Jeff Belyea <jeff wrote: I love the way you phrased > your response. I feel strongly > that Jesus never intended to > establish an "exclusive" club, > but rather an openness to > Satchitananda by any name - > the experiential core of all > religions and spiritual > traditions - with or without > the trappings of theistic > language. > > , Vir Rawlley <redderred > wrote: > > > > This is so true. One must walk the talk. If our path is through > Jesus, how wonderful this is, to walk the talk in the over-flowing > love of Christ, to be in the universal ocean of Sat - Chit - Ananda > in compassionate love for, and of All. > > > > Jeff Belyea <jeff wrote: Turning The Other Cheek > > > > When Jesus taught, he used > > parables (metaphors) to > > address the ineffable shift > > in consciousness from personal > > to Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > > > Turning the other cheek > > is one of his tough teachings. > > He suggested that when someone > > strikes you on the cheek, that > > you simply turn the other cheek. > > > > Sounds pretty wimpy, but... > > > > Metaphorically, turning > > the other cheek, could be > > seen to mean, that if one > > feels personally attacked, > > they can know that they are > > identified with their personal > > separate ego, and not with > > The Mind of Christ. > > > > To turn the other cheek > > would be to first recognize > > that once they have been graced > > with the conscious ability to > > put on The Mind of Christ, they > > can, when they feel attacked, > > simply turn their consciousness > > to their nondualistic identity - > > where it is impossible to > > take anything personally, > > because there is no person > > as their primary identity. > > There is only Christ Consciousness. > > > > If one feels the "sting" of > > personal attack, then for certain, > > they have allowed their personal > > ego, the false or secondary > > self, to slip back into their > > primary personal "identity". > > > > Having felt the sting, they can > > use it as a cue, and be snapped > > back into their true identity, > > their "I-I" as Ramana called it, > > their Awakened, Realized, Enlightened > > Self, their Mind of Christ. > > > > Having put on The Mind of Christ, > > one "naturally" (being naturally > > enlightened) walks in love, and > > does not, because they cannot, take > > anything personally. They have > > died to self and Awakened to > > Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > > > If one simply talks the talk, > > does not walk the walk, > > and has only learned to "sound" > > Awakened, Enlightened and Realized, > > then this capacity escapes them. > > > > Typically the pretenders spend > > a lot of time talking about > > phenomenon and their personal > > "talks" with God, and they > > easily feel attacked, because > > they consciousness is one of > > defense - knowing they are > > vunerable to being "found out". > > > > Tough love, tough gurus, sometimes > > will "strike the cheek" of a > > student to point out to them > > that they are in their ego. > > > > Slap happy, > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > community blog is at > > > > http://.net/blog/ > > > > "Love itself is the actual form of God." > > > > Sri Ramana > > > > In "Letters from Sri Ramanasramam" by Suri Nagamma > > > > > > > > > > Ramana > maharshi Advaita > vedanta Kundalini > yoga > Hatha yoga Philosophy of > education Yoga > clothing > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > > > > community blog is at > > http://.net/blog/ > > "Love itself is the actual form of God." > > Sri Ramana > > In "Letters from Sri Ramanasramam" by Suri Nagamma > > > > > Ramana maharshi > > Advaita > vedanta > > Kundalini yoga > > > Hatha > yoga > > Philosophy of > education > > Yoga clothing > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 , annaruiz wrote: > > Ah, so it is... > The body of Christ is the communion of Soul and Spirit on the path of > One's life, the mystical marriage of I and Thou. > > just This.... > > Ana > > what body? what communion? who marries whom? what are you talking about? mysticism starts where words end. thank you for your insights, jeff and vir. yosy > > Thanks Jeff :-) It is of course easier to institutionalise Jesus to a > > Church rather than to "Live Christ", akin perhaps to visiting a temple, > > lighting insense, bowing down and walking out with a sense of 'godly' > > accomplishment. > > > > Each rung of the 'ladder' (path of sat-chit-ananda) has its purpose, and > > each being is on that rung with other like beings till it is time to move > > on. Jesus also said, the first will be last and the last will be first, > > because every one is already there, since every 'rung' is after all Jesus. > > > > Jeff Belyea <jeff wrote: I love the way you phrased > > your response. I feel strongly > > that Jesus never intended to > > establish an "exclusive" club, > > but rather an openness to > > Satchitananda by any name - > > the experiential core of all > > religions and spiritual > > traditions - with or without > > the trappings of theistic > > language. > > > > , Vir Rawlley <redderred@> > > wrote: > > > > > > This is so true. One must walk the talk. If our path is through > > Jesus, how wonderful this is, to walk the talk in the over-flowing > > love of Christ, to be in the universal ocean of Sat - Chit - Ananda > > in compassionate love for, and of All. > > > > > > Jeff Belyea <jeff@> wrote: Turning The Other Cheek > > > > > > When Jesus taught, he used > > > parables (metaphors) to > > > address the ineffable shift > > > in consciousness from personal > > > to Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > > > > > Turning the other cheek > > > is one of his tough teachings. > > > He suggested that when someone > > > strikes you on the cheek, that > > > you simply turn the other cheek. > > > > > > Sounds pretty wimpy, but... > > > > > > Metaphorically, turning > > > the other cheek, could be > > > seen to mean, that if one > > > feels personally attacked, > > > they can know that they are > > > identified with their personal > > > separate ego, and not with > > > The Mind of Christ. > > > > > > To turn the other cheek > > > would be to first recognize > > > that once they have been graced > > > with the conscious ability to > > > put on The Mind of Christ, they > > > can, when they feel attacked, > > > simply turn their consciousness > > > to their nondualistic identity - > > > where it is impossible to > > > take anything personally, > > > because there is no person > > > as their primary identity. > > > There is only Christ Consciousness. > > > > > > If one feels the "sting" of > > > personal attack, then for certain, > > > they have allowed their personal > > > ego, the false or secondary > > > self, to slip back into their > > > primary personal "identity". > > > > > > Having felt the sting, they can > > > use it as a cue, and be snapped > > > back into their true identity, > > > their "I-I" as Ramana called it, > > > their Awakened, Realized, Enlightened > > > Self, their Mind of Christ. > > > > > > Having put on The Mind of Christ, > > > one "naturally" (being naturally > > > enlightened) walks in love, and > > > does not, because they cannot, take > > > anything personally. They have > > > died to self and Awakened to > > > Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > > > > > If one simply talks the talk, > > > does not walk the walk, > > > and has only learned to "sound" > > > Awakened, Enlightened and Realized, > > > then this capacity escapes them. > > > > > > Typically the pretenders spend > > > a lot of time talking about > > > phenomenon and their personal > > > "talks" with God, and they > > > easily feel attacked, because > > > they consciousness is one of > > > defense - knowing they are > > > vunerable to being "found out". > > > > > > Tough love, tough gurus, sometimes > > > will "strike the cheek" of a > > > student to point out to them > > > that they are in their ego. > > > > > > Slap happy, > > > > > > Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Does anyone have the quote about Jesus working in other realms, implying there are others unnoticed by the people of the era he lived and perhaps different from our realm of perception as well with whom Jesus fosters love? This isn't my religion so I don't know how to frame the words with internal institutional terminology. Flourishingly,Dharma MitraDharmaMitra2 AT gmail.com Helping you "Say It With Panache!"Because, how you say it can be, and often is, as important as what you want to convey, and what you have to say is very important to you.http://PROUT-Ananlysis-Synthesis.latest-info.com Copywriting - Editing - Publishing - Publicity Of all that anyone leading or teaching has to convey, the most valuable thing to cultivate and convey to others is a moral conscience. Only such persons deserve to lead others, in any capacity. Anything less is a menace to society. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Thanks Jeff :-) It is of course easier to institutionalise Jesus to a > > Church rather than to "Live Christ", akin perhaps to visiting a temple, > > lighting insense, bowing down and walking out with a sense of 'godly' > > accomplishment. > > > > Each rung of the 'ladder' (path of sat-chit-ananda) has its purpose, and > > each being is on that rung with other like beings till it is time to move > > on. Jesus also said, the first will be last and the last will be first, > > because every one is already there, since every 'rung' is after all Jesus. > > > > Jeff Belyea <jeff wrote: I love the way you phrased > > your response. I feel strongly > > that Jesus never intended to > > establish an "exclusive" club, > > but rather an openness to > > Satchitananda by any name - > > the experiential core of all > > religions and spiritual > > traditions - with or without > > the trappings of theistic > > language. > > > > --- In , Vir Rawlley <redderred@> > > wrote: > > > > > > This is so true. One must walk the talk. If our path is through > > Jesus, how wonderful this is, to walk the talk in the over-flowing > > love of Christ, to be in the universal ocean of Sat - Chit - Ananda > > in compassionate love for, and of All. > > > > > > Jeff Belyea <jeff@> wrote: Turning The Other Cheek > > > > > > When Jesus taught, he used > > > parables (metaphors) to > > > address the ineffable shift > > > in consciousness from personal > > > to Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > > > > > Turning the other cheek > > > is one of his tough teachings. > > > He suggested that when someone > > > strikes you on the cheek, that > > > you simply turn the other cheek. > > > > > > Sounds pretty wimpy, but... > > > > > > Metaphorically, turning > > > the other cheek, could be > > > seen to mean, that if one > > > feels personally attacked, > > > they can know that they are > > > identified with their personal > > > separate ego, and not with > > > The Mind of Christ. > > > > > > To turn the other cheek > > > would be to first recognize > > > that once they have been graced > > > with the conscious ability to > > > put on The Mind of Christ, they > > > can, when they feel attacked, > > > simply turn their consciousness > > > to their nondualistic identity - > > > where it is impossible to > > > take anything personally, > > > because there is no person > > > as their primary identity. > > > There is only Christ Consciousness. > > > > > > If one feels the "sting" of > > > personal attack, then for certain, > > > they have allowed their personal > > > ego, the false or secondary > > > self, to slip back into their > > > primary personal "identity". > > > > > > Having felt the sting, they can > > > use it as a cue, and be snapped > > > back into their true identity, > > > their "I-I" as Ramana called it, > > > their Awakened, Realized, Enlightened > > > Self, their Mind of Christ. > > > > > > Having put on The Mind of Christ, > > > one "naturally" (being naturally > > > enlightened) walks in love, and > > > does not, because they cannot, take > > > anything personally. They have > > > died to self and Awakened to > > > Christ or Cosmic Consciousness. > > > > > > If one simply talks the talk, > > > does not walk the walk, > > > and has only learned to "sound" > > > Awakened, Enlightened and Realized, > > > then this capacity escapes them. > > > > > > Typically the pretenders spend > > > a lot of time talking about > > > phenomenon and their personal > > > "talks" with God, and they > > > easily feel attacked, because > > > they consciousness is one of > > > defense - knowing they are > > > vunerable to being "found out". > > > > > > Tough love, tough gurus, sometimes > > > will "strike the cheek" of a > > > student to point out to them > > > that they are in their ego. > > > > > > Slap happy, > > > > > > Jeff html banner|**| --> Ramana maharshi Advaita vedanta Kundalini yoga Hatha yoga Philosophy of education Yoga clothing Brings words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with Mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 "I have other sheep you know not of." Jesus was speaking to his disciples and using a shepherd and his sheep as a metaphor for the guru/chela relationship. , "Dharma Mitra" <dharmamitra2 wrote: > > Does anyone have the quote about Jesus working in other realms, implying > there are others unnoticed by the people of the era he lived and perhaps > different from our realm of perception as well with whom Jesus fosters love? > > This isn't my religion so I don't know how to frame the words with internal > institutional terminology. > > > Flourishingly, > > Dharma Mitra > DharmaMitra2 AT gmail.com > > Helping you "Say It With Panache!" > > Because, how you say it can be, and often is, > as important as what you want to convey, > and what you have to say is > very important to you. > > http://PROUT-Ananlysis-Synthesis.latest-info.com > <http://prout-ananlysis-synthesis.latest-info.com/> > > *Copywriting - Editing - Publishing - Publicity* > > Of all that anyone leading or teaching has to convey, the most valuable > thing to cultivate and convey to others is a *moral conscience*. Only such > persons deserve to lead others, in any capacity. Anything less is a *menace > to society*. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Thank you, Jeff, that helped much. :-) On 3/3/06, Jeff Belyea <jeff (AT) mindgoal (DOT) com> wrote: "I have other sheep you know not of."Jesus was speaking to his disciplesand using a shepherd and his sheep as a metaphor for the guru/chela relationship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold"> [] On Behalf Of yosyx Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:43 PM Re: Turning The Other Cheek 12.0pt"> 10.0pt">, annaruiz wrote: > > Ah, so it is... > The body of Christ is the communion of Soul and Spirit on the path of > One's life, the mystical marriage of I and Thou. > > just This.... > > Ana > > what body? what communion? who marries whom? what are you talking about? mysticism starts where words end. thank you for your insights, jeff and vir. yosy Snip Dear yosy, How can we gather here and be with one another if we don’t use words? It may be true that our preference may be silence; but here in this cyberplace we have to be among another with words or perhaps pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 I am sorry dear friend. Although I am well versed in the Christian scriptures, I don’t think that I can identify what you’re referring to. font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold"> [] On Behalf Of Dharma Mitra Thursday, March 02, 2006 7:24 PM Re: Turning The Other Cheek 12.0pt"> 12.0pt">Does anyone have the quote about Jesus working in other realms, implying there are others unnoticed by the people of the era he lived and perhaps different from our realm of perception as well with whom Jesus fosters love? 12.0pt"> 12.0pt">This isn't my religion so I don't know how to frame the words with internal institutional terminology. 12.0pt">Flourishingly, Dharma Mitra DharmaMitra2 AT gmail.com Helping you "Say It With Panache!" Because, how you say it can be, and often is, as important as what you want to convey, and what you have to say is very important to you. http://PROUT-Ananlysis-Synthesis.latest-info.com Copywriting - Editing - Publishing - Publicity font-family:Verdana;color:#FF6600">Of all that anyone leading or teaching has to convey, the most valuable thing to cultivate and convey to others is a moral conscience. Only such persons deserve to lead others, in any capacity. Anything less is a menace to society. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 My wife (a devotee of Yogananda) also reminded me of Jesus' words, "In my Father's house are many mansions." , "Dharma Mitra" <dharmamitra2 wrote: > > Thank you, Jeff, that helped much. :-) > > > > On 3/3/06, Jeff Belyea <jeff wrote: > > > > "I have other sheep you know not of." > > > > Jesus was speaking to his disciples > > and using a shepherd and his sheep as > > a metaphor for the guru/chela relationship. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2006 Report Share Posted March 9, 2006 , Vir Rawlley <redderred wrote: > > One must walk the talk. If our path is through Jesus, how wonderful this is, to walk the talk in the over-flowing love of Christ, to be in the universal ocean of Sat - Chit - Ananda in compassionate love for, and of All. Talking without walking is just plain talk. But in truth there is only this walk. Nothing else. Not even talk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2006 Report Share Posted March 9, 2006 , "David Bozzi" <david.bozzi wrote: > > , Vir Rawlley <redderred@> wrote: > > > > One must walk the talk. If our path is through Jesus, how wonderful > this is, to walk the talk in the over-flowing love of Christ, to be in > the universal ocean of Sat - Chit - Ananda in compassionate love for, > and of All. > > > > Talking without walking > is just plain talk. > > But in truth there is only this walk. > > Nothing else. > > Not even talk. > Wanderer, your footsteps are the road, and nothing more; wanderer, there is no road, the road is made by walking. By walking one makes the road, and upon glancing behind one sees the path that never will be trod again. Wanderer, there is no road-- Only wakes upon the sea. Caminante, son tus huellas el camino, y nada más; caminante, no hay camino, se hace camino al andar. Al andar se hace camino, y al volver la vista atrás se ve la senda que nunca se ha de volver a pisar. Caminante, no hay camino, sino estelas en la mar. (Antonio Machado) @}->,->'-- yosy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.