Guest guest Posted February 3, 2002 Report Share Posted February 3, 2002 EARLIEST DIVINITY Her image has graced Stone Age caves. Her idols have stood I ancient temples. Hers was the first sacred form to be moulded by man. In Japan, She was Amaterasu., the sun-goddess; in Greece, She was Demeter, the corn-goddess; in Egypt, She was Isis, the river-goddess. The Vikings called Her Frejya, the Eskimos called Her Sedna, the Romans called Her Artemis. She was the Mexican Coatlicue, the Tibetan Tara, the Babylonian Ishtar, the Indian Shakti. In every place She was the same:Life-bestower, nourisher, lover, comforter, and final killer. She was the Mother Goddess who resided in dark caves or sat on pink lotuses surrounded by birds and beasts, spinning the web of life and kneading the earth with life-giving sap. Archeological excavations across Europe and West Asia have revealed prehistoric paintings and carvings of women with exaggerated feminine features -- indicating the awe of the ancient artists with the life-giving capacity of woman. Some figures actually show women giving birth. The role of man in the creative process is spasmotic, momentary. It is the woman who nutures the fetus in the womb and nourishes the newborn on the breast. She was therefore seen in early societies as an extension of the Earth, another mysterious manifestation of cosmic fecundity. In the rhythmic cycles of Nature -- the rising and setting of the sun, the waxing and waning of the moon. the change of seasons, the dance of tides and the shifting fertility of women -- man sensed the unending transformations of the Goddess: from seductive nymph through tender matron to stern crone. DOMESTICATION OF THE WILD WOMAN So long as man lived in villages, in close touch with Nature, her understood the interplay of creative and destructive forces. He accepted the dynamism and diversity of the world around him as the essence of the Goddess. But then he began migrating and moving into cities, trying to escape the vagaries of the natural world. Nature appeared more and more like a chaotic force to be mastered. Such nomadic and urban thoughts made man turn away from the Mother Goddess. He sought refuge in a wise, almight Father God, a divine warrier who would restrain the wildness of Nature and domesticate it for the benefit of mankind. And so the Mother Goddess, until then free, was given a lord, a master, a husband. Marriage and maternity became tools to tame her. Myths emerged of how powerful warrior gods forced wild goddesses into submission. In Babylon, bards narrated with relish the story of how Marduk killed the female monster Tiamat and created the Earth out of her dead body. In Greece, the local goddesses of the plains and valleys were reduced to nymphs whom the Olympian father god Zeus seduced or raped. Unattached, the Mother Goddess was feared. Her powers were considered untamable, hence dangerous. She was invoked only to kill demons. But as the consort of a male god, she was much more approachable. Her powers were checked and put to good use. The wild goddess, who continued to dwell outside human settlements, was associated with disease, death and misfortune. She was warded away as a demoness or transformed into an ogress, to be despised by all. This psychological shift was reflected in human society. Woman, worshipped for her ability to create new life, became a wife. Her freedom was curtailed. Her faithfulness was touted as the hallmark of all feminine virtue. She because subservient to her husband's will. Like the Earth, she became man's property. REJECTION OF THE TEMPTRESS Around 600 BCE there was another noticeable shift in the human psyche -- from world affirmation to world negation. The shift took place both in the East and West. It was the age that saw the rise of Buddhism in India and Orphism in Europe. No more was worldly life seen as exciting or worth exploring -- instead it was perceived as a mire of desire and delusions. The mortal, aging, disease-prone body was seen as the prison of the blissful soul. Man sought moksha - an escape from the vagaries of Nature, from the cycle of birth and death. He rejected woman as the temptress. She represented worldly life -- children, family, and responsibilities. She was the force that trapped the soul on earth. Such beliefs led to further deterioration of the social status of women and the divine status of the Mother Goddess. The procreative abilities of women were now perceived as profane. Menstruation was associated with pollution and sickness, something to be ashamed of. Communities that once publicly celebrated the emergence of a child from the mother's womb now shunned the birthing rite. Sexual symbols were no longer used to rouse the fertility of Nature; now they aroused disgust. In the monasteries, monks -- who were mostly men -- turned away from the two principles that sustain Nature: sex and violence. Celibacy and non-violence became the means to break free from earthly bondage and to acquire powers that gave mankind power over Nature itself. Violence was only celebrated when it helped impose the religion of the male gods. THE GODDESS IN INDIA However, religions evolved differently in the East and West.The West saw life as a constant battle between good and evil, between materialism and spirituality. All that was undesirable came from the evil of the flesh. It had to be rejected in favor of the pure soul. The free, unattached, sensuous aspect of the Goddess was associated with diabolical forces, with materialism, with evil. The mild, virginal, chaste aspect was linked to the Divine, to the Spirit -- though she was never equated to the Supreme Divine Principle. In the East, there were no absolutes -- no absolute good and absolute evil. All that was undesirable came from ignorance; all that was desirable came from enlightenment. Life was an attempt to harmonize matter with spirit, the Mother Goddess with the Father God. Man had the option to either relish the fleeting pleasures of worldly life with awareness, or to transcend it through realization. Such an attitude allowed the Mother Goddess cult to flourish, especially in India, where two distinct, principle traditions evolved -- the Vedic and the Tantric. Both linked the Goddess to samsara -- the material world, the manifest cycle of birth and rebirth, the realm of eternal change. She was the flow of Energy; the substance that embodies the soul and gives form and identity to all. As Shakti, the Goddess was supreme untamable Universal Energy. As Shree, She was the supreme domesticated goddess of fortune. She was Maya, the supreme unfathomable delusion of existence. She was Prakriti, Mother Nature, responsible for earthly existence. From her came material pleasures and worldly powers, kama and artha. The male gods were more closely associated with unmanifest reality, pure consciousness, the still soul or Paraatmaa. The ascetic Shiva sought moksha, liberation, from material fetters; while the more worldly Vishnu propounded the doctrine of dharma, detached fulfillment of social obligations. Thus the Goddess and the God stood opposite ends of the metaphysical spectrum. She represented material reality, her represented spiritual reality. Together, they gave life fullness and completeness. This material adapted from the book, "Devi: An Introduction" by Devdutt Pattanaik (Vakils, Feffer & Simns Ltd., Mumbai, 2000) Contributed by Devi Bhakta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2002 Report Share Posted May 11, 2002 I am a newcomer and have started at the beginning of these discussions to try and understand what Skatism is all about. Penkatali sent me here to get my questions about the Goddess answered. I was moved by this explanation of Shakta Heritage. It explains so much about why the Goddess was connected with Nature - because the woman was the life giver and nurturer; why the patriarchal societies and religious came as people moved from Nature into the cities; why the West abandoned Goddess worship in their dichotomy of right and wrong, and why the East was able to sustain Goddess worship with the dichotomy of Enlightenment vs Ignorance. How much preferable it is to fight Ignorance than to call natural processes evil and fight those. I look forward to studying with this group. Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2002 Report Share Posted May 12, 2002 Greetings Lynn Welcome to Shakti Sadhana. Our meetings here is as I believe meant to be. I hope you will stay and grow together with us under the love, guidance and the light of Mother. OM ParaShaktiye Namaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.