Guest guest Posted February 12, 2002 Report Share Posted February 12, 2002 Personally i think the emergence of instant goddess is a natural phenomenon. An evidence of an evolutionary process in our belief system. This come abt as the result of our need to adjust ourselves to the changes that is happening around us. As we undergo the environmental, emotional, psycholigical and physical changes, so does our spiritual need. The beauty of hinduism is its flexibility to adapt to these changes. That is why it is able to survive for thousand of years. It has been suggested by academics that much of western pagan religion : myth and culture has risen out of hinduism. ( John campbell : Indian Paganism) Its the ability of the hindus to add and subtract their goddess and god that makes them unique. ( Refer to David KInsley : Hindu Goddesses) In popular hindu belief that any person who have done extremely good deeds to the society, upon their death are elevated to the status of god and goddess. Evidence as in case of Ghandi and Mother Theresa. And we must remember that hinduism is just not a religion, its a way of life. The dharma. So its not a surprise if u see a statue of these good "soul" being erected in the temple. A classical case is that of Goddess mariamman. Popular amongst the south indian. Perceived as the goddess of chickenpox, small pox and other natural disease. How she evolved to be a goddess is still debatable. But somehow she are being accepted into the strata of the hindu tradition. The merits of this system of add and minus is to encourage people to be good and role model to others are as usual being abused by others for their own gains. Some how actor and actress are being idolised and worshipped of which to me is rather irrational. But its something to b expected dosent it. The good and bad comes hand in hand. Ultimately it dosent matter as to who you worship. Be it Santosa Ma, Sivaji or Shakti, the most important is that this act of worshipping fulfill the need. The need to feel connected to the devine one that eventually gives us this sense of wholeness and complete. OM ParaShaktiye Namaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2002 Report Share Posted February 12, 2002 The Hindus believe that GOD is one but SHE manifests in many forms. This is clearly reflected in Hindu temples. A hindu believe in one GOD but accepts all GODs even from out side his own. We can see this in the life of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa ( 1836 - 1886 ). He was a Kali Devi worshipper yet he experimented with the methods of Christianity, Islam, Budhism and Jainism and concluded that all the religious methods lead to the same. They all teach the same concept and reach the same GOD, as all the water in the rivers eventually merge in the ocean. It is that man with his limited mental capacity thinks that different religions have different GODS. Om ParaShaktiye Namaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2002 Report Share Posted February 12, 2002 My learned friend Baburoy has raised an interesting question : "why is this happening?" "Personally i think the emergence of instant goddess is a natural phenomenon" as ive indicated in my earlier post. And with regards to the movie stars and such, it's a natural outgrow from the modern revolution: the introduction of Movies, TVs, Radios and who knows what the computer revolution might bring us. Another form of Instant Goddess Microsoft version? Why I said is irrational because I look at them in my own perspective. In order for us to understand this irrational behaviour as we would like to term them, we need to go down to their level of understanding and to the basic question of: What do these people see that I don't? and several other questions like : Why is this movie star so special? Why not the other movie star who is equally popular? I would love to have a conversation with any one of them, so that they can give me an inside into their heart and mind. Until then we can only based our understanding through assumptions or refer to books which might and might not give us the answers. I used two books as my point of reference with regards to this discussion : "How to Know GOD: the soul's journey into the mystery of mysteries" by Deepak Chopra and "Why People believe in weird things : Pseudoscience, superstitious and other confusions of our time" by Dr Micheal Shermer. Baburoy remarked further "This is not the religion that we were taught." Ah! but as ive already indicated Hinduism is not just a religion. It's a way of life and some might say they are life itself. So how do we teach a life that have been alive in the society for thousand of years? And can we remove this life ? The beauty of Hinduism is it tolerance towards others ( perhaps this is our weakness?) esp in the issue of Goddess and God. We must remember that these are simple rural people who do this type of worship. They might just have basic education or none at all. And because they dont have any other source of entertainment, these movie stars fit in fulfilling their need. These films travel to the villages and they are like a miracle to these simple people, they are like god and goddess. Men who are unbelieveably handsome, women who are unimagineably beautiful, doing amazing feats and lush and elegant settings ... it must seem to them like these are gods and goddesses frolicking in the heavens. Remember Ramayana and Mahabhrata. These Hinduism's stories and epics are not matters of study or education, they are the matrices of existence. Those aren't books to read ... they're living stories, told around the fire by old men and women of great respect. These epics are like the bollywood too if u think of it. Everywhere, in every culture, people idolize actors and actresses and pop singers ... but they do not confuse them with gods and goddesses. Erica and Adi_shakti ( I like to thank them for their contributions to this discussion) have already gave us some good examples and from personal experience too. There is no difference between the fanaticism of Elvis and Khusboos , somehow the Indians in India have gone one step ahead. I would like to go back to my remarks abt this hindu tradition of add and minus their god and goddess. "In popular hindu belief that any person who have done extremely good deeds to the society, upon their death are elevated to the status of god and goddess" And back to the question of "why this actress, and not that actress?". These movie star must have special qualities that attracted these simple rural folk. To them these movie stars have done some good to them. So what is good to them might not be to us. Movies stars do the service of bringing joy and excitement into quiet, poor and unexceptional lives. And movies their only window to a larger world -- a beautiful fantasy they can escape into. What else do these common folk would ask for. It does make sense dosent it? It fulfill their need. Remember that is the basic human expectation It goes back to the devotee's perception of the one they idolize and the truth would lie with the individual devotee ... if a man thinks of say Madhuri Dixit as a goddess, and worships her as Durga, it is good, but if he simply pants over her as an unattainable ideal of feminine beauty, he is on the wrong track. So it comes back to the same answer: it is in the mind of the devotee. An urban intellectual will look and say "these stupid people are worshipping movie stars" ... but actually they are worshipping the higher feelings that these films and actors and actresses produce in their souls? Through this their spirituality is a way of transcending mundane life as well ... but not into fantasy, we assume ... but rather escaping into a higher reality. These are simple, hard-working, undereducated people. They are not swamis or intellectuals. So the question is: Is it a spiritual dead end to confuse Bollywood fantasy with spiritual ecstacy?. How can we say that their "transcendence" of reality is inferior if the ultimate effect is the same? This brings us to another question posted by Devi_bhakta "while any kind of devotion can purify the devotee, and prepare them for higher worship in future lives, it will not lead them to moksha. Does that seem like a legitimate interpretation" Om ParaShaktiye Namaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.