Sati and Shivan : my conclusion

[Guest guest]

Thank you all for this insight. I have to agree with Nora about the

concept of I think charity versus dakshina. You see even now

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi has been trying to recreate the Brahmanical

caste system by trying to get a group of 40,000 pundits together for

a whopping billion dollars (to perpetuate world peace). But you see,

Shiva is not for this idea. Teaching from Shakyamuni (ostensably the

Jesus of India) explain that Buddha understood that in a few thousand

years into Kali Yuga the world would return to barbarianism. Which is

just where we are going. You see superstition and physical might

usurping resaon and ethics everywhere (aka Bush, anti-Bush, etc,

right vs. left). For this reason Buddha iniated people in large

groups into what he called the Vajra Caste. It could be called the

one caste. His intention was to gather up the enlightened of all

castes together so that they might be stronger in the long run. The

means for doing this was the Kalachakra Tantra. Kalachakra was the

first Buddha - the timeless buddha, and he is joined in one face with

Akshobya - the Buddhist name for Shiva. Moreover, it is written by a

few that Jesus and Mary spent much time in the unknown years in India

and some in Kashmir. My belief is that Kalachakra and Christos and

Sivaism, and Shaktism all have compassion, charity and good will

towards all caste and different people of mankind as their goal, to

which they have all tried to override all challenges to their

idealogies to become catholic inthe real sense or universal

religions. Meanwhile everyone still fractionalizes all systems as if

they are different. But my version of truth is that these religions

at least share in the largest sense of all encompasing compassion for

all humans nay all of life. If people are interested then Skanda,

Kartekeya, Subramaniya are all I believe Jesus, the closest thing

that exists in the Hindu world to Jesus anyway. And as the son of

Shiva this could be proven.