Guest guest Posted April 18, 2002 Report Share Posted April 18, 2002 devi_bhakta Religions evolved differently in the East and West. The West came to perceive life as a constant battle between good and evil, between materialism and spirituality. All that was undesirable came from the evil of the flesh. It had to be rejected in favor of the pure soul. The free, unattached, sensuous aspect of the Goddess was associated with diabolical forces, with materialism, with evil. The mild, virginal, chaste aspect was linked to the Divine, to the Spirit -- though she was never equated to the Supreme Divine Principle. In the East, on the other hand, there were no absolutes -- no absolute good and absolute evil. All that was undesirable came from ignorance; all that was desirable came from enlightenment. Life was an attempt to harmonize matter with spirit, the Mother Goddess with the Father God. Man had the option to either relish the fleeting pleasures of worldly life with awareness, or to transcend it through realization. Such an attitude allowed the Mother Goddess cult to flourish, especially in India, where two distinct, principle traditions evolved -- the Vedic and the Tantric. Both linked the Goddess to samsara -- the material world, the manifest cycle of birth and rebirth, the realm of eternal change. She was the flow of Energy; the substance that embodies the soul and gives form and identity to all. As Shakti, the Goddess was supreme untamable Universal Energy. As Shree, She was the supreme domesticated goddess of fortune. She was Maya, the supreme unfathomable delusion of existence. She was Prakriti, Mother Nature, responsible for earthly existence. From her came material pleasures and worldly powers, kama and artha. The male gods were more closely associated with unmanifest reality, pure consciousness, the still soul or Paraatmaa. The ascetic Shiva sought moksha, liberation, from material fetters; while the more worldly Vishnu propounded the doctrine of dharma, detached fulfillment of social obligations. Thus the Goddess and the God stood opposite ends of the metaphysical spectrum. She represented material reality; He represented spiritual reality. Together, they gave life fullness and completeness. (This material adapted from the book, "Devi: An Introduction" by Devdutt Pattanaik (Vakils, Feffer & Simns Ltd., Mumbai, 2000) Aum Maatangyai Namaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.