Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

to guru or not to guru?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

i am very clear about this...

 

the following should not be undetaken without a guru

 

1) kundalini yoga

 

2) hatha yoga - looking at t.v. and practicing asanas specially

standing on head can have disastrous effects!!! such asanas should be

practiced only under the expert guidance of a trained yoga teacher...

(pl read miss prainbow's earlier post)

 

3)pranayama

 

4) tantrik sadhana (like shava sadhana and vira sadhana etc)

 

5) om meditation (nirguna )

 

so, all yogas which involve the 'awakening' of kundalini should not

be practiced without the guidance of a guru...

 

one can always chant saguna mantras, do japa meditation and other

modes of worship without a guru...

 

there used to be a time when even sree lalita sahasaranama or devi

mahatmiyam could not be recited or chanted without initiation... but

over time, things have changed ... and now people are chanting these

without initiation...

 

this is my humble opinion...

 

WHile the guru may not be needed to start on the path of simple

sadhana but one needs a guru if one wants to practice specific

sadhana.

 

my 2 cents...

 

jai gurudeva!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

my two paise (have you noticed that almost all small

change in many countries have names starting with

"p"?) I agree whole heartedly with you

 

Kochu

--- adi_shakthi16 <adi_shakthi16 wrote:

> i am very clear about this...

>

> the following should not be undetaken without a guru

>

> 1) kundalini yoga

>

> 2) hatha yoga - looking at t.v. and practicing

> asanas specially

> standing on head can have disastrous effects!!! such

> asanas should be

> practiced only under the expert guidance of a

> trained yoga teacher...

> (pl read miss prainbow's earlier post)

>

> 3)pranayama

>

> 4) tantrik sadhana (like shava sadhana and vira

> sadhana etc)

>

> 5) om meditation (nirguna )

>

> so, all yogas which involve the 'awakening' of

> kundalini should not

> be practiced without the guidance of a guru...

>

> one can always chant saguna mantras, do japa

> meditation and other

> modes of worship without a guru...

>

> there used to be a time when even sree lalita

> sahasaranama or devi

> mahatmiyam could not be recited or chanted without

> initiation... but

> over time, things have changed ... and now people

> are chanting these

> without initiation...

>

> this is my humble opinion...

>

> WHile the guru may not be needed to start on the

> path of simple

> sadhana but one needs a guru if one wants to

> practice specific

> sadhana.

>

> my 2 cents...

>

> jai gurudeva!!!

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more

http://games./

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Not the yanks. They always want to be diffrent. They have even 'changed' English

so they can appear different.

 

;-)

 

- Seshadri.

 

 

 

 

, sankara menon <kochu1tz> wrote:

> my two paise (have you noticed that almost all small

> change in many countries have names starting with

> "p"?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

OM Adi Shakti

 

You say, "all yogas which involve the 'awakening' of kundalini

should not be practiced without the guidance of a guru." This is

true, but then you add, "one can always chant saguna mantras,

do japa meditation and other modes of worship without a guru."

Japa meditation too will ultimately lead to Kundalini rising and

should not be practiced without a Guru. The saving grace of Japa

meditation is that saguna mantras have imbedded in them a

lock that tends to prevent Kundalini from arising until the

sadhaka has purifed himself enough. When purification is

sufficient, that same Mantra will produce a key to open the lock

and allow the aspirant to cross the threshold of Satchitananda.

Many time, however, the aspirant is impatient and is able to

circumvent the lock so that Kundalini is released prematurely. It

is here that real danger is encountered. So many people are

dabbling in these practices that the incidence of premature

Kundalini release has shot up. So much so, that the western

psychiatric profession has given it a designation in their DSM IV

of Spiritual Emergence Syndrome.

 

All the spiritual practices you describe will, if practiced with

enough faith, devotion, and intensity, lead to Kundalini rising.

 

There is no other way of knowing Brahman, no other way for

complete spiritual evolution than through Kundalini rising

through the Chakras. Raising Kundalini may not be the stated

intent of a spiritual practice but it is the basis for all authentic

spiritual practices. They would not be spiritual practices if they

did not ultimately involve Kundalinil. Kundalini is the power and

the Pranamaya Kosha is the structure for all spiritual

endeavours. That is why an experienced, knowledgeable

person guide/Guru/priest/teacher is necessary for spiritual

development.

 

OM Namah Sivaya

 

Omprem

 

, "adi_shakthi16"

<adi_shakthi16> wrote:

> i am very clear about this...

>

> the following should not be undetaken without a guru

>

> 1) kundalini yoga

>

> 2) hatha yoga - looking at t.v. and practicing asanas specially

> standing on head can have disastrous effects!!! such asanas

should be

> practiced only under the expert guidance of a trained yoga

teacher...

> (pl read miss prainbow's earlier post)

>

> 3)pranayama

>

> 4) tantrik sadhana (like shava sadhana and vira sadhana etc)

>

> 5) om meditation (nirguna )

>

> so, all yogas which involve the 'awakening' of kundalini should

not

> be practiced without the guidance of a guru...

>

> one can always chant saguna mantras, do japa meditation

and other

> modes of worship without a guru...

>

> there used to be a time when even sree lalita sahasaranama

or devi

> mahatmiyam could not be recited or chanted without initiation...

but

> over time, things have changed ... and now people are

chanting these

> without initiation...

>

> this is my humble opinion...

>

> WHile the guru may not be needed to start on the path of

simple

> sadhana but one needs a guru if one wants to practice specific

> sadhana.

>

> my 2 cents...

>

> jai gurudeva!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear ompremji, true ! very true!

 

of course, if you recite "om namo bhagvate vasudevaya{" 24 hours a

day standing on one leg with eyes closed and hands held in a prayeful

position like BHAKTA DHRUVA , sooner or later LORD SHRIMAN NARAYANA

is bound to appear and give you his cosmic vision....

 

i was just referring to those bhaktas who before rushing to work do a

10 minute aarthi to god/ess and say prayers and do mala meditation

(108 times) and mantra meditation for 15 minutes or so.... i such

instances, 'kundalini' awakenng takes for ever to manifest...

 

so you are right in mentioning the key word 'intensity' but in the

busy humdrum of modern day life, do we really devote that much time

to spiritual practice or sadhana? how many of us are full time yogis?

we are all full time bhogis and part time yogis? at least, those who

are still in grihasta ashrama or students.

 

but , kundalini awakening although not a goal by itself is definitely

a by product of all spiritual sadhana ( as you rightly mentioned but

depends on faith, devotion and intensity)

 

there is a very famous incident in the life if swami vivekananda - it

is said that swamiji was very eager to experience the 'awakening of

kundalini' and would constantly bug shri ramakrishna regarding this -

shri ramakrishna did not oblige swami vivekananda - rather, young

naren had to wait a long time before shri ramakrishna actually helped

him in this regard... (may be collin or some other devotee can throw

light on this.... i am writing from memory)

 

so, some of us are 20 minute yogis and believe me it will be another

liftime before our kundalini reaches the sahasara chakra... i wonder

if mine has even travelled from muladhara as yet? smiles

 

have a great day!!!

 

love

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks Adi, for a very practical question!

 

I think many if not most of our members live the lives of

householders -- and in Shakta, if I'm not mistaken, that is the

preferred approach. An embrace of Her world rather than an ascetic

rejection of it.

 

But the fact remains that many devotees (and I will quote you

here) "before rushing to work, do a 10-minute aarthi to god/ess and

say prayers and do mala meditation (108 times) and mantra meditation

for 15 minutes or so ... in such instances, Kundalini's awakening

takes forever to manifest!"

 

OmPrem noted the importance of "intensity" in spritual practice --

but I will echo your question: What is the solution? Is a daily

observance like the one described above enough? Is it "better than

nothing," or is it incumbent upon us to strive for more? Should we

simply relax and hope for more time in our next incarnation? Or are

there practical steps we can take to "intesinfy" our practice in the

context of the householder life?

 

Hoping the combined wisdom of our membership will yield some

important insights on this question, which is so vital to so many ...

 

Aum Maatangyai Namahe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This intensity can be of any kind. It can be a longing for knowledge,

longing for love and affection and longing for duty. It does not

require a meditation or an elaborate puja or a great emotion and

bhakthi or tantra and other austerities.

It can be as simple as being truthful and following ones duties in

life. A person when he performs his duties in his life and follows

the dharmic path consciously or without is equal to the greatest

saint. He need not trust in lord not need to know its existance. The

kundalini because of the sathvik life will raise on its own and in

its own way befetting the character of the person.

 

Even otherwise if someone spends 10 minutes everyday in a puja, thats

better than 0 minutes and 24 hours of ignorance. That little bit will

add to his karma and will eventually build into a force that will

propell the person to strive higher.

 

My opinion is no body is lost. Everyone is a children of the lord. If

the person is unable to wake up on his/her own, the lord will wake

the person up. Sometimes as rudely as for kanakadaasa and purandara

daasa or as simply as for tyagaaraja.

Worrying here, to be honest, is not at all required.

 

There is a story from the Living with the Himalayan masters:

Swami Rama once had to go to a graveyard to do penance. During his

penance, his mind started objecting to the activity so much so that

at one time before it was over, he decided to give up and go back. On

his way to the station, he was passing through a prostitute's house

and the music and the song from the house kind of said shame and

shame to Swami Raama. This prompted him to go back and resume his

penance.

 

Having completed his penance in its due course he goes back to the

prostituites to pay her respects. He explains the situation from

which she helped him and also addressing her as mother. Listening to

the saint, a great transformation comes over her. She says if she can

be a mother to the monk, she can be a mother to everyone else, and

giving up her house goes to Kaashi and lives o the river boat

uttering nothing but ram ram. If u ask her if she had her sleep, she

will say ram and if she wants to sing she will say ram till one day

she announced that she is leaving the body at an appointed time and

it should be given to the fist to eat.

 

The awakening call will come. It does not matter the life one has been

living or the deeds one has been performing. Valmiki is another good

example. Trust lord. No one is lost.

 

Only that a gnani and a yogi knows what is happening and quite

conscious of everything and others may not. In the hands of mother,

every one is quite safe. Even with respect to time.

 

- Seshadri.

 

 

 

-

"devi_bhakta" <devi_bhakta >

<>

Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:35 PM

Re: to guru or not to guru?

Thanks Adi, for a very practical question!I think many if not most of

our members live the lives ofhouseholders -- and in Shakta, if I'm

not mistaken, that is thepreferred approach. An embrace of Her world

rather than an asceticrejection of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think I have started to write very lengthy and verbose texts. ;)

- Seshadri.

- Seshadri

Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:55 PM

Re: Re: to guru or not to guru?

This intensity can be of any kind. It can be a longing for knowledge,

longing for love and affection and longing for duty. It does not

require a meditation or an elaborate puja or a great emotion and

bhakthi or tantra and other austerities.

It can be as simple as being truthful and following ones duties in

life. A person when he performs his duties in his life and follows

the dharmic path consciously or without is equal to the greatest

saint. He need not trust in lord not need to know its existance. The

kundalini because of the sathvik life will raise on its own and in

its own way befetting the character of the person.

Even otherwise if someone spends 10 minutes everyday in a puja, thats

better than 0 minutes and 24 hours of ignorance. That little bit will

add to his karma and will eventually build into a force that will

propell the person to strive higher.

My opinion is no body is lost. Everyone is a children of the lord. If

the person is unable to wake up on his/her own, the lord will wake

the person up. Sometimes as rudely as for kanakadaasa and purandara

daasa or as simply as for tyagaaraja.

Worrying here, to be honest, is not at all required.

There is a story from the Living with the Himalayan masters:

Swami Rama once had to go to a graveyard to do penance. During his

penance, his mind started objecting to the activity so much so that

at one time before it was over, he decided to give up and go back. On

his way to the station, he was passing through a prostitute's house

and the music and the song from the house kind of said shame and

shame to Swami Raama. This prompted him to go back and resume his

penance.

Having completed his penance in its due course he goes back to the

prostituites to pay her respects. He explains the situation from

which she helped him and also addressing her as mother. Listening to

the saint, a great transformation comes over her. She says if she can

be a mother to the monk, she can be a mother to everyone else, and

giving up her house goes to Kaashi and lives o the river boat

uttering nothing but ram ram. If u ask her if she had her sleep, she

will say ram and if she wants to sing she will say ram till one day

she announced that she is leaving the body at an appointed time and

it should be given to the fist to eat.

The awakening call will come. It does not matter the life one has been

living or the deeds one has been performing. Valmiki is another good

example. Trust lord. No one is lost.

Only that a gnani and a yogi knows what is happening and quite

conscious of everything and others may not. In the hands of mother,

every one is quite safe. Even with respect to time.

- Seshadri.

-

"devi_bhakta" <devi_bhakta >

<>

Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:35 PM

Re: to guru or not to guru?

Thanks Adi, for a very practical question!I think many if not most of

our members live the lives ofhouseholders -- and in Shakta, if I'm

not mistaken, that is thepreferred approach. An embrace of Her world

rather than an asceticrejection of it.To from this group,

send an email to:shakti_sadhnaaYour use of

is subject to the

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

hey desh, very interestting observations!!!

 

in the bhaagwat gita, arjuna asks sri krshna a queston"if one has

faith but is slack in efforts because of the mind straying from ego

and is imperfect in his yoga, what end does he come to,o

krishna?<

here what arjuna is askng sri krishna basically is if

we do not follow the path of sadhna and i according

to prescibed injunctions, what is to become of such

a seeker?

 

basically, if *intensity* is less and faith and devotion are less

than perfect ?

 

sri krishna replies- "neither in this world or in the next can be

ruin for him, parha.no well-doer , o loved one, meets with a sad end-

 

here sri krishna is assuring all the devotees that he

welcomes all sadhakas who seek him , however imperfect

their sadhna may be - in other words, no efforts for

realizing god is ever wasted-a sadhak who has faith will

ultimately arrive at the truth if not in this birth but in

subsequent births........ in the next life he acquires he

state of perfection he had failed in the previous life

and finally attains the goal-

 

so, even for those who are impure or not perfect in thir yogic path

due to vasanas , sri krishna offers a ray of hope -

 

we all know the story of valmiki!!! when valmiki was repenting his

sins that he committed as a highway robber , shri narada muni

redirected his enegies towards the holy name of rama.

in

spiritual life, one ray of devotion is enough to take us

towards the blazing sun of llumination though the journey

may be longer-

 

btw sesh . do not worry about the verbosity or length of your posts-

it is the content (and the intent) that is important !

 

love

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...