Guest guest Posted June 4, 2002 Report Share Posted June 4, 2002 Good morning, devi_bhakta! may i please comment on this sadhana versus yoga? although the title reads sadhana versus yoga - in my humble opinion it should read Sadhana Yoga , the simple reason being the goal of all sadhana (be it mantra sadhana, tantra sadhana, yantra sadhana, or shakti sadhana ) is Yoga - union with the divine... so, in this sense - the word sadhana has at least several connotations..... one it is a 'practice' mostly spiritual but not limited to spirituality alone... basically, anything that is practiced with zeal and enthusiasm can be loosely called 'sadhana' - in this sense, everything is 'sadhana' or practice - dancing, poetry, painting, even surfing .... for without practice, how can one achieve perfection? so to a nurse, taking care of the sick and diseased is a sadhana; to a lawyer serving his his client is a sadhana ; to a yoga teacher teaching yoga is a sadhana... in his sense, sadhana is always linked with 'accomplishment' - so we view 'sadhana' as an 'instrument' (or practice) that helps us to accomplish something - That is why many sadhaks equate sadhana with 'siddhis' (attainment of occult powers) but this is taking a very 'narrow' view for the goal of any sadhana shold not be the mere attainment of siddhis (magical powers) but should be one of attaining 'higher consciousness' or seeking 'union with the divine or yoga... this siddhis may be a by-product of sadhana but never the ultimate destination... the ultimate destination is only seeking the 'one wiithout the second'... so as our beloved ompremji states again and again " we must be firmly grounded in our sadhana" for that is the means (sadhan or instrument) to gain perfection (spiritual) be it mantra sadhna, yantra sadhana, tantra sadhana and yoga and dhyana sadhana! So in this sense all " the ritual gestures, offerings, and reading of scriptures , perfoming tapas or austerities, counting the beads, taking god's name 1008 times, practicing all the yoga asanas " etc become just an external act, with no content and no meaning- if it does not a create a certain attitude or bhava in the spiritual aspirant... the desire to 'unite' with the divine through the total surrender of mind, body, speech and spirit... so all sadhana should be based on this understanding - sadhana is only a means not an end by itself - the end being perfection or completion - spiritual perfection or completing the process of merging with the divine (yoga) ... Here, i would like to quote from swami krishnaananda..... "spirit of Sadhana in the Inner Path is more important than the outward form with which most people usually busy themselves. One spends the whole day in counting beads, and thinks that his Sadhana is over with that. Another attends the temple, rings the bell and does some exercises, reads a few books, so that the hours of the day are all filled up, which is all enough to make him think that he is busy with his Sadhana. Now, all this is the outward form which Sadhana may take, and a very necessary form, and it is quite all right as far as it goes. It loses its meaning only when it is deprived of the spirit and the purpose with which it is expected to be done. It is to be remembered that Sadhana is not any kind of bodily action that is outwardly demonstrated in the world, but a state of mind, a condition of thinking, a consciousness in which one lives. Suppose one counts ten thousand beads on a particular day, with a heart filled with rancour and an emotion in a state of a ebullition caused by frustration, prejudice or jealousy, the beads are not going to do one any good. All actions are symbols of an inward mood of mind, and when the mood is absent, the action by itself has no significance. The majority of Sadhanas are lost in the wilderness of erratic thoughts and confused ideologies. This is the precise reason why, very often, there is no success in Sadhana, despite years of routines that are being followed, perhaps with great enthusiasm but bereft of the spirit needed. " so, it is the 'spirit' underlying ' the pursuit of 'sadhana' that gives it its true meaning . AS ADI SHANKARA SAYS BEFORE ATTAINING spiritual perfection on "'READ ALL THE SCRIPTURES YOU WANT TO ATTAIN THAT UNDERSTANDING " BUT AFTER ATTAINING THAT UNDERSTANDING, ONE DOES NOT NEED SCRIPTURES..." for the knower of brahman is brahman himself! or the knower of devi is devi herself! that is why all great yogis , sages and saints follow a path of rigorous and vigorous spiriutual discipline in the beginnig stages of their sadhana but once they have attained that 'perfection' they do not need all the external paths for they are well situated in their internal paths ! please forgive me if there are any errors in presentation! hari om! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.