Guest guest Posted July 18, 2002 Report Share Posted July 18, 2002 Here's an odd little item carried by today's wire from Hindu Press International (HPI), which they sourced from the "Religion News Service." I couldn't find the original article, so here is HPI's condensation. Any thoughts or comments? Personally, I find the whole thing irritating enough to make an accomplished yogi start grinding her/his teeth. Christian Yoga! Celebrity Fad Yoga! To quote the immortal words of Moon-Unit Zappa: "Gag me with a spoon!" MOBILE, ALABAMA, July 15, 2002: This report from Religion News Service provides insight into what happens when the Hindu practice of yoga is attempted by those of other religions. The article states, in part, "A few years ago, Susan Bordenkircher wasn't comfortable doing yoga. It wasn't that she got bent out of shape by any of the asanas -- downward facing dog, half lotus forward fold or the scorpion, to name but three yoga positions. She just wasn't sure if it was an appropriate activity for a Christian. Long associated with mysticism and Eastern religions in particular, yoga is denounced by some who claim it promotes pantheism and worship of self." ... An 1962 yoga book called "An Invitation to Christian Yoga," included, "sketches and written instructions for 25 yoga postures; each one is prefaced by a verse from the Bible. ...also a Christian adaptation of 'Salute to the Sun,' a series of movements devout Hindus perform at dawn as thanksgiving for a new day. Roth offers 'The Salute to the Son,' a series of movements designed to accompany the Lord's Prayer." .... "In recent years, yoga's popularity has boomed as many have searched for a few minutes of stillness and for low-impact exercise that fosters flexibility and strength. Celebrities, too, have joined the masses on their yoga mats. With the ancient exercises' contemporary resurgence, Bordenkircher urges those interested in practicing yoga to choose their instructors carefully. "It can be very destructive. I've really literally sat there and just prayed for discernment' at some seminars, she said, noting that she feels uncomfortable with those who suggest that humans possess divine power. Cecil R. Taylor, dean of the School of Religion at the University of Mobile, said he would advise those interested in taking a Christian approach to yoga to 'make sure it's thoroughly imbued with the spirit of Christ.' 'You'd be able to judge a lot by checking your spirit,' Taylor said. 'Sometimes people just instinctively know, 'This is just not what I ought to be doing.' They don't know why. It may be theological perceptivity.' " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2002 Report Share Posted July 18, 2002 Dear devi_bhakta, how true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2002 Report Share Posted July 19, 2002 Definitly in the top 10 list of "Most ignorant things Ive ever heard" ~se , "devi_bhakta" <devi_bhakta> wrote: > Here's an odd little item carried by today's wire from Hindu Press > International (HPI), which they sourced from the "Religion News > Service." I couldn't find the original article, so here is HPI's > condensation. Any thoughts or comments? Personally, I find the whole > thing irritating enough to make an accomplished yogi start grinding > her/his teeth. Christian Yoga! Celebrity Fad Yoga! To quote the > immortal words of Moon-Unit Zappa: "Gag me with a spoon!" > > MOBILE, ALABAMA, July 15, 2002: This report from Religion News Service > provides insight into what happens when the Hindu practice of yoga is > attempted by those of other religions. > > The article states, in part, "A few years ago, Susan Bordenkircher > wasn't comfortable doing yoga. It wasn't that she got bent out of > shape by any of the asanas -- downward facing dog, half lotus forward > fold or the scorpion, to name but three yoga positions. She just > wasn't sure if it was an appropriate activity for a Christian. > > Long associated with mysticism and Eastern religions in particular, > yoga is denounced by some who claim it promotes pantheism and worship > of self." ... > > An 1962 yoga book called "An Invitation to Christian Yoga," included, > "sketches and written instructions for 25 yoga postures; each one is > prefaced by a verse from the Bible. ...also a Christian adaptation of > 'Salute to the Sun,' a series of movements devout Hindus perform at > dawn as thanksgiving for a new day. Roth offers 'The Salute to the > Son,' a series of movements designed to accompany the Lord's Prayer." > > ... "In recent years, yoga's popularity has boomed as many have > searched for a few minutes of stillness and for low-impact exercise > that fosters flexibility and strength. Celebrities, too, have joined > the masses on their yoga mats. With the ancient exercises' > contemporary resurgence, Bordenkircher urges those interested in > practicing yoga to choose their instructors carefully. > > "It can be very destructive. I've really literally sat there and just > prayed for discernment' at some seminars, she said, noting that she > feels uncomfortable with those who suggest that humans possess divine > power. > > Cecil R. Taylor, dean of the School of Religion at the University of > Mobile, said he would advise those interested in taking a Christian > approach to yoga to 'make sure it's thoroughly imbued with the spirit > of Christ.' 'You'd be able to judge a lot by checking your spirit,' > Taylor said. 'Sometimes people just instinctively know, 'This is just > not what I ought to be doing.' They don't know why. It may be > theological perceptivity.' " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2002 Report Share Posted July 20, 2002 OM Devi Bhakta This questioning of the compatibility of Yoga and Christianity is something that each Christian must answer for themselves. In one of my meditation classes a few years ago, one of the participants had also recently returned to her Roman Catholic faith. She, too, wondered about the appropriateness of taking a meditation course that was based on Yoga/Vedanta philosophy and that used Sanscrit Mantras. She asked her priest if it was O.K. for her to continue with the meditation class. He said. "Yes. Of course." So she continued. Whenever someone asks me questions like this, I tell them this anecdote and they are relieved. Fortunately, her priest was more enlightened than Cecil R. Taylor, dean of the School of Religion at the University of Mobile who was quoted in the story as saying, "make sure it's [Yoga] thoroughly imbued with the spirit of Christ." It is interesting that the current movement of Christian Meditation was started by one man - John Main - in 1975. He learned to meditate from a Hindu teacher while in India. Of course, Christian meditators do not use a Sancrit mantra but their meditation practice is based on the biblical injunction, "Be still and know that I am God." (Psalms 46:10) As for Susan Bordenkircher's claim that "she feels uncomfortable with those who suggest that humans possess divine power", she should read her Bible a bit more closely, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect." (Matthew 5: 48) or "...he answered them and said, The Kingdom of God cometh not with observation. Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the Kingdom of God is within you. Luke 17:20-21) Both of the people quoted in the article live in the U.S. "Bible Belt" and have been victimized by their too-narrow versions of Christianity. They should be paying attention to John 8:32, " Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." It is not entirely the fault of a fundamentalist Christian indoctrination that leads people to ask these questions. The Roman Catholic Church went out of its way to root out and suppress many liberating ideas. Ideas which gave people an insight into their own divinity and made them less dependent on Church authority. One example is the Christian Church's insistence that people are sinful. In actuality, we are not sinful, we are just subject to the pull of Maya, the ego, and the law of Karma. Through sadhana, we eventually triumph over these obstacles. Karma, of course, involves the idea of reincarnation. Prior to 312 AD, many Christians did believe in and preach the validity of reincarnation. But in the Council of Nicea in 325 Christian teachings of reincarnation from such luminaries as Origen was rejected in its entirety. The belief in reincarnation lingered until 543 and 553, when Emperor Justinian convened two church councils to officially declare reincarnation as heresy with draconian punishments for those who dared to espouse it . It is no wonder that modern Christians are amazed to learn that their Church at one time promoted, or, at least, tolerated a belief in such ideas as reincarnation. The current Pope, however, is a breath of fresh air. He has been quoted in 1999 as saying, "Heaven is not a locality, but a divine state of mind. Hell is not an underground realm but the state of those who freely and definitely separate themselves from God. Purgatory is not a place, but a purification process on the way to Heaven." He would make an excellent Yogi/Vedantin. OM Namah Sivaya Omprem , "devi_bhakta" <devi_bhakta> wrote: > Here's an odd little item carried by today's wire from Hindu Press > International (HPI), which they sourced from the "Religion News > Service." I couldn't find the original article, so here is HPI's > condensation. Any thoughts or comments? Personally, I find the whole > thing irritating enough to make an accomplished yogi start grinding > her/his teeth. Christian Yoga! Celebrity Fad Yoga! To quote the > immortal words of Moon-Unit Zappa: "Gag me with a spoon!" > > MOBILE, ALABAMA, July 15, 2002: This report from Religion News Service > provides insight into what happens when the Hindu practice of yoga is > attempted by those of other religions. > > The article states, in part, "A few years ago, Susan Bordenkircher > wasn't comfortable doing yoga. It wasn't that she got bent out of > shape by any of the asanas -- downward facing dog, half lotus forward > fold or the scorpion, to name but three yoga positions. She just > wasn't sure if it was an appropriate activity for a Christian. > > Long associated with mysticism and Eastern religions in particular, > yoga is denounced by some who claim it promotes pantheism and worship > of self." ... > > An 1962 yoga book called "An Invitation to Christian Yoga," included, > "sketches and written instructions for 25 yoga postures; each one is > prefaced by a verse from the Bible. ...also a Christian adaptation of > 'Salute to the Sun,' a series of movements devout Hindus perform at > dawn as thanksgiving for a new day. Roth offers 'The Salute to the > Son,' a series of movements designed to accompany the Lord's Prayer." > > ... "In recent years, yoga's popularity has boomed as many have > searched for a few minutes of stillness and for low-impact exercise > that fosters flexibility and strength. Celebrities, too, have joined > the masses on their yoga mats. With the ancient exercises' > contemporary resurgence, Bordenkircher urges those interested in > practicing yoga to choose their instructors carefully. > > "It can be very destructive. I've really literally sat there and just > prayed for discernment' at some seminars, she said, noting that she > feels uncomfortable with those who suggest that humans possess divine > power. > > Cecil R. Taylor, dean of the School of Religion at the University of > Mobile, said he would advise those interested in taking a Christian > approach to yoga to 'make sure it's thoroughly imbued with the spirit > of Christ.' 'You'd be able to judge a lot by checking your spirit,' > Taylor said. 'Sometimes people just instinctively know, 'This is just > not what I ought to be doing.' They don't know why. It may be > theological perceptivity.' " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2002 Report Share Posted July 23, 2002 Namaskar OmPremji! Thank you for your calmly evenhanded thoughts on this polarizing and emotionally charged issue. I especially liked your analysis of the woman student's fear that Yoga promotes the (gasp!) idea of Divinity within; it bears repeating. You wrote: *** she should read her Bible a bit more closely, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect." (Matthew 5: 48) or "...he answered them and said, The Kingdom of God cometh not with observation. Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the Kingdom of God is within you." (Luke 17:20-21)*** As we've discussed in other contexts, people can read the same scripture, but the wisdom (or lack of wisdom) to be found therein varies according to the mind that processes it. A broad-minded person will find common truths in the relevations of every faith; the narrow- minded will find evidence for more division -- passages they'll interpret to prove the superiority of their own faith over the faiths of others, or even to justify killing those who believe differently. You fairly mention the shortcomings of both "Bible Belt" religion (i.e., U.S. fundamentalist Christian Protestantism) and traditional Roman Catholicism -- while noting that Pope John Paul II has shifted attention back to the Biblical ideas you quoted above. How wonderful that you said of the Pope, "He would make an excellent Yogi/Vedantin." Certainly, he is not a liberal Pope -- he has infuriated many with his hardline position against women in the priesthood, abortion and other hot-button issues. And his refusal to condemn coversion attempts in India has led the magazine "Hinduism Today" to attack him furiously (example: http://www.hinduismtoday.com/2000/2/2000-2- 11.html) -- never missing an opportunity to quote a narrow statement and gleefully highlighting the Church's current higj-profile problems with child-molesting priests. But it's not really fair to berate an octogenarian religious leader for adhering to old-school tenets of the faith he leads. After all, the same charge could be leveled at Hinduism Today's recently deceased publisher, Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami -- a wonderful man and exalted spiritual leader, but rigidly old-fashioned and conservative in his strict-interpretation Hinduism. But one must respect the awe-inspiring spiritual accomplishments of both men -- by all accounts, Pope and Satguru alike are/were known for projecting an amazingly pure and cleansing aura of spiritual power and peace. Thank you again for a wonderful post. Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2002 Report Share Posted July 23, 2002 OM Devi Bhakta You made two comments about the current Pope that I would like to address: (1) "Certainly, he is not a liberal Pope -- he has infuriated many with his hardline position against women in the priesthood, abortion and other hot-button issues" and (2) "an octogenarian religious leader for adhering to old-school tenets of the faith he leads." Regarding the first point, any religion or spiritual path is not a democracy. It is structured the way that it is in order to achieve certain effects. Those who are unable to see the value of the structure are invited to seek another spiritual path rather than try to tinker with and ultimately destroy their current path. The tenets and practices of the religion have stood the test of time. It is up to the adherent to get rid of his/her ego, to purify his/her mind, intellect, emotions, chakra-nadi system in order to understand and attain the benefits of following the teachings of the religion. It is no different from having a Guru. One does not debate with the Guru about his/her ideas, pronouncements, or suggestions. You either have faith in the Guru ( the religion) or you don't. Without faith, you have nothing - nothing but your ego and your fears, that is. I was a little disappointed in the second comment as it smacks of age discrimination and is certainly well below your usual sattvic level of comment. One's age certainly has nothing to do with the truth of enlightened utterances. The "Old-school tenets" comment is rooted in the ideas modernism, democracy, and progressivism, all of which concepts are ego-based and are traps for the serious aspirant. On another note related to the original posting, it is interesting that many claim that Jesus spent the missing 12 years of his life in India receiving instruction from teachers there. Personally, I think that if Jesus did receive instruction for anyone, he probably got it from a non-dervish Sufi. Sufis were in the Holy Land in those days, so Jesus would not have to travel far. His 40 days and nights in the desert has echoes for the 40-day period that Sufis consider the maximum for austerity practices. Both Christianity and Sufism are Bhakti practices with an emphasis on remembering God, on being a lover of God. In both there is a longing for God and sense of separation from God, witness Christ's plea from the cross, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken my?" (Mark 15:34). As Llewellyn Vaughan-Lee has pointed out in "Sufism: The Transformation of the Heart", Sufis, like Christians, think "that there are two ways of attracting God's attention. Either we make ourself perfect and then He has to love us, or we give ourself to Him and then He cannot resist our need to be with Him." In Hindu terms, these would be Raja Yoga and Jnana Yoga for the first way and Bhakti Yoga and Karma Yoga for the second way. The practices and objectives of Sufism, Hinduism and Christianity have many common elements and the wise person would not segregate the religions or segregate the practices of the religion from the religion itself. Religions are like hatha yoga practices - they have the same underlying sensibility and the same goal while the differences are only the differences intentionally made to accommodate the psychology and karmic load of specific types of people. Once, the person has practiced his/her religion/spiritual path/hatha yoga practice faithfully and intensely for a long period of time and managed to purify their psychology and karmic load, there are no longer differences to be seen but only a common vision to be shared. There are many paths to the top of the mountain, but at the top the view is the same. Om Namah Sivaya Omprem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2002 Report Share Posted July 23, 2002 Namaskar OmPremji: Thank you for your excellent and erudite comments on Sufism. I also very much like your nicely stated conclusion that "Religions are like hatha yoga practices -they have the same underlying sensibility and the same goal while the differences are only the differences intentionally made to accommodate the psychology and karmic load of specific types of people." For an excellent exploration of the hidden connections between Tantra, Sufism, and Mystical Christianity in a Shakta context, I highly recommend the book "Twilight Goddess" by Thomas Cleary and Sartaz Aziz. It is a slow read; the scholarship is very dense. But it is a rich vein of mindblowing information. (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1570624992/ref=cm_mp_fil/103- 2190588-3100602) As to my comments on Pope John Paul II, your response takes them out of context, thus missing their intent. Because in fact, I was making precisely the point that you mention -- it's unfair to condemn a spiritual leader for not bending their tenets of faith to the demands a modern sensibilities. I felt bad that a publication as fine as "Hinduism Today" couldn't resist taking partisan swings at Catholicism in response to Catholicism's partisan swings at Hinduism. My observation that both the Pope and Satguru Subramuniyaswami were religious leaders in their 80's "smacks of age discrimination" only if you misunderstand what I am saying. My point was *not* that challenging authority is an advanced activity that doddering old priests can't be expected to understand -- but precisely the opposite: That it's wrong to condemn a religious leader for upholding the tenets of their religion, when presumably they've been around long enough -- and are spiritually accomplished enough -- to know of what they speak to a much greater degree than their critics. My observation may still not qualify as a "sattvic level of comment," but my intent was certainly not as mean-spirited as your interpretation would suggest. In any event, I apologize for not making my point more clearly; like most members here, I write my posts within a fairly tight time-frame, and most failings of structure and clarity (or spelling and grammar, for that matter) are due mainly to my horrible habit of not proffreading before I click "Send." ;-) Thank you as always for your comments and participation in the forum; I always look forward to your contributions. Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.