Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Jesus & the Lost Goddess

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Namaste Devibhakti & William

 

For a very good read on Christian Theology and Scriptures from a more

enlightened perspective, I HIGHLY reccomend "Jesus and the Lost

Goddess" by Frecke & Gandy.

 

Very informative & well researched. I was amazed at some of the

obvious connections between Ancient Christianity and Shaktism/Vedanta.

 

~sunelectric

 

, "devi_bhakta" <devi_bhakta> wrote:

> Namaskar William!

>

> *** Awww man I really love your posts! ***

>

> Wow, thank you! I appreciate you kindness. And I thank you for your

> excellent posts as well. Your latest raised another few thoughts in

> my mind, and so I'd like to take a moment and clarify what I see as

> Shaktism's attitude toward the other world faiths.

>

> You write *** I see this [in the symbolism of Genesis and

> Revelation]: ... It is not "the world" that is destroyed, but the

> Christian world. ...These are symbols for the spiritual renaissance

> occuring now! ***

>

> Your analysis of the Biblical books of Genesis and Revelation is

> astute. It is indeed enlightening to think of the books as

> symbolizing, respectively, the creation and destruction of

> the "oppositional" approach to religious dogma: i.e., light vs.

dark;

> male vs. female; good vs. evil; etc. But you know, I tend to read

all

> of it not as an objective description of what will happen to the

> world, but rather a *symbolic* exploration of what will happen to

the

> individual who undertakes serious spiritual practice -- i.e.

sadhana.

>

> In my last post, I spoke of Christianity's Jesus as a yogi. But what

> we think of today as institutional "Christianity" is mainly the work

> of St. Paul, who wrote the most influential *interpretive* books of

> the New Testament; which were then further cooked up and perverted

by

> medieval theologians like Augustine -- and finally we end up with a

> nasty dogma, propounded and enforced by massive corporate entities

> like the Catholic and Protestant churches, with a vested interest in

> maintaining the status quo. Under all that weight of history and

> dogma, however, the historical Jesus --a gifted Yogi whom Hindus can

> understand as readily as Shankara or Ramakrishna -- can still be

> heard clearly.

>

> In fact, I could push my theory even further, and suggest that Jesus

> was -- like any true Yogi -- speaking very precisely the language of

> Shiva-Shakti. Exhibit A: Take the ancient Oxyrhynchus Manuscript of

> the Gospels -- a primary source drawn upon by the ancient Church

> fathers in tailoring the New Testament that has come down to us.

> Asked how one reaches the Kingdom of Heaven, Jesus replies as one

who

> truly believes (as do the Shaktas) that the Earth is divinity

> incarnate and that all of Nature is holy:

>

> "The fowls of the air and the beasts, whatever is beneath the Earth

> or upon the Earth, and the fishes of the sea, these they are that

> draw you [toward Heaven]. And the Kingdom of Heaven is within you

and

> whosoever knoweth himself shall find it. And, having found it, ye

> shall know yourselves that ye are sons and heirs of the Father, the

> Almighty, and shall know yourselves the ye are in God and God in

you."

>

> Now, don't be put off by the male-centric language. Trust me, I

> wouldn't be quoting it here unless I had a Shakta point in mind. You

> see, Jesus is simply using the male idiom of his time to explain

that

> humanity is the son of God, the Father -- just as Shaktism (and

every

> ancient Goddess religion) sees all humanity are the children of the

> Mother. But Jesus was a great Yogi whose insight extended beyond the

> confining Male paradigm of his time. In the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas

> (also rejected by the ancient Church Fathers), Jesus sounds like a

> *real* Shakta when he speaks of the relationship between spirit and

> matter:

>

> "When you make the two one, and when you make the inner as the outer

> and the outer as the inner and the above as the below, and when you

> make the male and female into a single one, so that the male will

not

> be male and the female not be female .... then you shall enter the

> Kingdom." (Logion 22)

>

> And again, he offers an unforgettable image of Divine Immanence:

>

> "Cleave a piece of wood, I am there; lift up the stone and you will

> find Me there." (Logion 77)

>

> So my belief, William, is not that any one religion is on the verge

> of destruction -- but my hope is that dogma and intolerance of

> opposing views is on the verge of destruction. Our focus is upon the

> Divine Feminine here in this Group; but we do not condemn or

> disparage any other honest and tolerant approaches to the Divine.

>

> There is no need for dogmatic Christianity to disappear -- let it

> remain in place for those who need it and find comfort in it. But

let

> us also realize that -- at the individual level -- all of these

> labels of belief cease to have concerte meaning. After all, the

Hindu

> mystic (or Tantric), the Buddhist mystic (or Tantric), the Muslim

> mystic (or Sufi), the Christian mystic (or Gnostic) -- all are

> approaching the same Unity with the Divinity within, where all

> oppositions and differences are burned away.

>

> Aum Maatangyai Namahe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This thread reminded me of my favorite non-Hindu

Shakta text, "Thunder, Perfect Mind", which, along

with the Gospel of Thomas, was part of the Nag Hammadi

library. The full text with some commentary is

available at

 

http://deoxy.org/thunder.htm

 

and also at

 

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/maps/primary/thunder.html

 

Re-reading it just now, there is nothing I can say

about it. It profoundly speaks for itself.

 

Jai Kali Ma!

--Aravind

 

 

--- sunelectric101 <ouranian wrote:

> Namaste Devibhakti & William

>

> For a very good read on Christian Theology and

> Scriptures from a more

> enlightened perspective, I HIGHLY reccomend "Jesus

> and the Lost

> Goddess" by Frecke & Gandy.

>

> Very informative & well researched. I was amazed at

> some of the

> obvious connections between Ancient Christianity and

> Shaktism/Vedanta.

>

> ~sunelectric

>

> , "devi_bhakta"

> <devi_bhakta> wrot

 

 

 

Health - Feel better, live better

http://health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Early Christian teaching called, "Gnosis" are filled with revelations and other

knowledge about "Sophia" the originatrix of the whole creation. Please look at

library page of www.gnosis.org for much more info.

-

sunelectric101

Wednesday, August 07, 2002 12:16 PM

Re: Jesus & the Lost Goddess

 

 

Namaste Devibhakti & William

 

For a very good read on Christian Theology and Scriptures from a more

enlightened perspective, I HIGHLY reccomend "Jesus and the Lost

Goddess" by Frecke & Gandy.

 

Very informative & well researched. I was amazed at some of the

obvious connections between Ancient Christianity and Shaktism/Vedanta.

 

~sunelectric

 

, "devi_bhakta" <devi_bhakta> wrote:

> Namaskar William!

>

> *** Awww man I really love your posts! ***

>

> Wow, thank you! I appreciate you kindness. And I thank you for your

> excellent posts as well. Your latest raised another few thoughts in

> my mind, and so I'd like to take a moment and clarify what I see as

> Shaktism's attitude toward the other world faiths.

>

> You write *** I see this [in the symbolism of Genesis and

> Revelation]: ... It is not "the world" that is destroyed, but the

> Christian world. ...These are symbols for the spiritual renaissance

> occuring now! ***

>

> Your analysis of the Biblical books of Genesis and Revelation is

> astute. It is indeed enlightening to think of the books as

> symbolizing, respectively, the creation and destruction of

> the "oppositional" approach to religious dogma: i.e., light vs.

dark;

> male vs. female; good vs. evil; etc. But you know, I tend to read

all

> of it not as an objective description of what will happen to the

> world, but rather a *symbolic* exploration of what will happen to

the

> individual who undertakes serious spiritual practice -- i.e.

sadhana.

>

> In my last post, I spoke of Christianity's Jesus as a yogi. But what

> we think of today as institutional "Christianity" is mainly the work

> of St. Paul, who wrote the most influential *interpretive* books of

> the New Testament; which were then further cooked up and perverted

by

> medieval theologians like Augustine -- and finally we end up with a

> nasty dogma, propounded and enforced by massive corporate entities

> like the Catholic and Protestant churches, with a vested interest in

> maintaining the status quo. Under all that weight of history and

> dogma, however, the historical Jesus --a gifted Yogi whom Hindus can

> understand as readily as Shankara or Ramakrishna -- can still be

> heard clearly.

>

> In fact, I could push my theory even further, and suggest that Jesus

> was -- like any true Yogi -- speaking very precisely the language of

> Shiva-Shakti. Exhibit A: Take the ancient Oxyrhynchus Manuscript of

> the Gospels -- a primary source drawn upon by the ancient Church

> fathers in tailoring the New Testament that has come down to us.

> Asked how one reaches the Kingdom of Heaven, Jesus replies as one

who

> truly believes (as do the Shaktas) that the Earth is divinity

> incarnate and that all of Nature is holy:

>

> "The fowls of the air and the beasts, whatever is beneath the Earth

> or upon the Earth, and the fishes of the sea, these they are that

> draw you [toward Heaven]. And the Kingdom of Heaven is within you

and

> whosoever knoweth himself shall find it. And, having found it, ye

> shall know yourselves that ye are sons and heirs of the Father, the

> Almighty, and shall know yourselves the ye are in God and God in

you."

>

> Now, don't be put off by the male-centric language. Trust me, I

> wouldn't be quoting it here unless I had a Shakta point in mind. You

> see, Jesus is simply using the male idiom of his time to explain

that

> humanity is the son of God, the Father -- just as Shaktism (and

every

> ancient Goddess religion) sees all humanity are the children of the

> Mother. But Jesus was a great Yogi whose insight extended beyond the

> confining Male paradigm of his time. In the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas

> (also rejected by the ancient Church Fathers), Jesus sounds like a

> *real* Shakta when he speaks of the relationship between spirit and

> matter:

>

> "When you make the two one, and when you make the inner as the outer

> and the outer as the inner and the above as the below, and when you

> make the male and female into a single one, so that the male will

not

> be male and the female not be female .... then you shall enter the

> Kingdom." (Logion 22)

>

> And again, he offers an unforgettable image of Divine Immanence:

>

> "Cleave a piece of wood, I am there; lift up the stone and you will

> find Me there." (Logion 77)

>

> So my belief, William, is not that any one religion is on the verge

> of destruction -- but my hope is that dogma and intolerance of

> opposing views is on the verge of destruction. Our focus is upon the

> Divine Feminine here in this Group; but we do not condemn or

> disparage any other honest and tolerant approaches to the Divine.

>

> There is no need for dogmatic Christianity to disappear -- let it

> remain in place for those who need it and find comfort in it. But

let

> us also realize that -- at the individual level -- all of these

> labels of belief cease to have concerte meaning. After all, the

Hindu

> mystic (or Tantric), the Buddhist mystic (or Tantric), the Muslim

> mystic (or Sufi), the Christian mystic (or Gnostic) -- all are

> approaching the same Unity with the Divinity within, where all

> oppositions and differences are burned away.

>

> Aum Maatangyai Namahe

 

 

Sponsor

 

 

 

shakti_sadhnaa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Bless you Jim Blakeley !

 

I was looking for this site for sometime. I have with me a portion of

the text and have been looking for the full version.

 

Thank you.

 

OM ParaShaktiye Namaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...