Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 Namaste Ompremji! Your criticism of Catholicism stands out from all your other knowledgeable and worthwhile posts. Every major religion has had its share of terrorizing people in the name of the religion, Catholocism being no exception. Like other religions, Catholicism has also produced a rich cornucopia of highly venerable saints. St Teresa of Avila was a highly evolved yogini who exhibited several siddhies such as levitation. The bridal mysticism of St John of the cross equals that of Mirabai. The soulful prayers of St Francis compares with the devotional outpouring of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. (BTW I am not catholic). The book Concentration by Mouni Sadhu tells that many christian saints were aware of yogic secrets akin to patanjali yogasutras. If Hindus did not reciprocate on attacks made on them in the past, it is definitely not because of belief in ahimsa, but out of fear and a belief in blind fatalism(occasional a great soul like Madhava Vidyaranya comes about to wake them out of this fatalism, the reference is to systematic muslim carnage in the 15 the century which ceased with the formation of the Vijayanagar kingdom). Germs can cause disease only if the immune system is weak. Likewise, if missionaries are going around converting people, there must be something inherently wrong in Hinduism like the infernal caste system which systematically kept the majority of people out of joys of well lived religious life. Most people living in the west are probably aware only of the benign side of Hinduism but it has a sinister side too. I know of several people of "lower" castes who converted because they could not withstand insults. I was reading of the history of Kerala, and several hundred years back, the lower castes were forbidden to come in the sight of the upper castes; and if the same person were to convert to Islam or Christianity, he was treated as an equal. If Hinduism did not engage in physical violence, it engaged in the more insidious mental torture. What other religion exists that treats its own adherents worse than animals. Missionaries, by converting are not bringing them closer to God but at least are providing some self-respect. As Swami Vivekanada said, Bharatavarsha has been and still is living in tamas for the past 1000 years. People will eat pure rice alone the whole day, keeping a "pure" diet and sleep the whole day in the guise of "holiness"- a glaring example of how tamas has been mistaken for sattwa. To those who would tell me that caste system was ordained by God, I will refer them to the section of the Santiparva of Mahabaharata where Bhisma lying on the deathbed is giving advice to Yudhishtra, when Y. asks him " What is the criteria for being a brahmin, is it birth or character" to which Bhisma replies " character alone decides who is a brahmin, birth is immaterial". Aum Namasivaya, yogaman Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 DEAR CHILD OF DEVI, first, let me congratulate you on your excellent choice of ID... you win hands down! how can i contradict a 'child of devi'? for devi lives in her children. right? smiles! well, dear one, i am very impressed ! you include the names of st.theresa of avilla, st.john of the cross, and st.francis of assissi as great yogis with enormous siddhis,,, but, dear one- you forgot to include the greaest YOGI OF THEM ALL ---- JESUS CHRIST ! CHRIST COULD CURE THE LEPER BY HIS TOUCH, GIVE SIGHT TO THE BLIND AND WALK ON WATER AND ABOVE ALL LIKE KRISHNA PARAMATMA FEED A MILLION PEOPLE WITH NO PROBLEM,,,so he was siddha purusha himself! shri ramakrishna paramahamsa HIMSELF HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE GREATNESS OF JESUS CHRIST !!! ( btw i am not a christian, either but i love christ for his purity, simplicity and humility) YOU SAY RATHER BOLDLY that " if missionaries are going around converting people, there must be something inherently wrong in Hinduism like the infernal caste system which systematically kept the majority of people out of joys of well lived religious life." YES, THE CASTE SYSTEM (THE PRACTICE OF UNTOUCHABILITY) is indeed one of the vulnerable points of hindu society and christiam nissionaries certainly took advantage of this specially in the impoverished states of kerala, bengal, orissa etc to convert the so called low caste harijans to christianity... after all was it karl marx or hegel who said 'religion is the opium of the masses... " indeed, these converts might have had access to better education ,better health and even better social status but in the bargain , they did lose something - they got alinated from their own culture... but if you claim if Hindus converted to christianity because of the inhuman caste syatem, then majority of christians should convert to ISLAM (specially the LOUIS fARAKHAN BRAND) ...and why so? dID YOU KNOW THAT THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH ONCE SUPPORTED SLAVERY ? When SALVERY was in vogue in America, the Bishop of London wrote to the slave-owners in the South: "Christianity and the embracing of the Gospel does not make the least alteration in civil property or in any of the duties which belong to civil relations; but in all these respects it continues Persons just in the came State as it found them. The Freedom which Christianity gives is Freedom from the bondage of Sin and Satan and from the Dominion of Men's Lusts and Passions and inordinate Desires but as to their outward condition, whatever that was before, whether bond or free, their being baptised and becoming Christians makes no manner of change in them."... yes, caste system is a disgrace and inhuman but "slavery' is worse - for it advocated 'ill-treatment' ' humiliation' and above all lynching? " St. Paul urged one slave ONESIMUS to return to his master. It is said that the ships that carried slaves from Africa, had gospel hymn AMAZING GRACE penned to the ships, indicating that people who made poor innocent Africans as slaves, were very devout Christians. They did not see anything wrong in making black Africans as slaves.. Columbus a very devout Christian was indeed a missionary who did NOT feel any remorse in taking slaves from America." Thessalonians 3:22 "Servants obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eye service, as men pleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God." sO CHILD OF DEVI, HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY THIS ? DO YOU THINK I AM MISQUOTING THE BIBLE JUST TO PROVE A POINT - or that slavery never existed ? well, that is the whole point- the caste system that was originally devised in the purusha sukta was based on division of labour but in time, it degeneated into an abusive practice.... blame men and society not the scriptures for the misuse and abuse of VARANASHMA DHARMA... IN THE BHAGWAT GITA lord krishna says... ACCORDING TO THREE GUNAS (SATTWIC, RAJASTIC AND TAMASIC) AND PROPER DIVISION OF LABOR, THE `CHATHUR-VARNA' OR `FOUR-COLORED' OR `FOUR- DIVISION' SOCIETY WAS CREATED BY ME. ALTHOUGH I AM THE CREATOR OF THIS SYSTEM, YOU SHOULD KNOW ME AS THE `NON-CREATOR OF THE SYSTEM' AND I AM ENDLESS. chikld of devi - did you know that the word 'caste' originated from the portugese word 'casta' meaning 'pure' race and varna meaning color... the caste system was based on division of labor ( our beloved economist wadam smith would love it) !!! BRAHMINS undertook the work of taking care of priestly duties, KSHATRIYAS undertook the work of taking care of ruling the country and VAISYAS undertook the work of taking care of business. SHUDRAS undertook the work of helping all the three upper castes in their day to day duties. but,, it is men who exploited this fourfold varanashrama dharma and brought disgrace to HINDUISM! THERE IS AN INTERESTING STORY IN THE LIFE OF ADI SHANKARA... once when adii shankara was walking on the streets of kasi (benaras)- shri shankara was accosted by an untouchable- shri SANKARA angrily asked an untouchable to move out his way and untouchable talked back. DEAR SIR! WHAT DO YOU WANT TO MOVE ? BODY OR SOUL? To which Sankara said: THE UNTOUCHABLE WHO SPEAKS LIKE THAT CAN BE NOBODY ELSE, BUT LORD SHIVA HIMSELF And prostrated in front of lORD SHIVA WHO WAS DISGUISED AS THE UNTOUCHABLE... WE HAVE MANY RISHIS WHO BELONG TO LOWER CASTES... valmiki was a 'robber' who was transformed by sage narada to become a saint... Saint thiruvalluvar is a weaver by profession... sant kabir was also a weaver... RELIGION IS NOT BARTER---i must become a 'muslim' only if i feel Islam IS MY ONLY MEANS TO SALVATION NOT BECAUSE ISLAM ALLOWS ME TO HAVE FOUR WIVES!!! SMILES!!! SIMILARLY, I MUST BECOME A CHRISTIAN ONLY IF I FEEL THE JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONLY SAVIOUR not because I can have a better standard of life!! gandhiji never liked the use of the word 'untouchables' - h called them 'harijans' and called them children of god or hari! in INDEPENDENT INDIA, UNTOUCHABILITY HAS BEEN ABOLISHED and government is making every effort to provide better opportunities in matters of education and employment to the lower castes... do christians ever feel sorry for the shiploads of slaves they brought from india and africa to the western world? in the bible, it is said "love thy enemy" - but in today's world, we are seeing the so called christian leaders want to go t war at the slightest pretext! yes, BRAHMINS PERSECUTED THE LOWER CASTES AND ARE NOW PAYING A PRICE FOR IT... what goes around comes around... yes, missionaries like mother teresa did great service to the hungry and homeless in calcutta and other poor regions of the world- more kudos to them... but, by the same token , can we forget the inquisitions and the salem witch hunts? so, child of devi -we are all children of devi and THE DIVINE MOTHER loves us all no matter what our backgrounds are... (hindu, islamic, christian, jewis, jain or buddhist) om sree sree matrayaii namaha!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 OM Yoga man In your haste to try to make a point, you overlooked my comment in post 3416, "...the negative and fundamentally flawed basis of Christianity as practiced by all the branches of Christianity except for the mystical ones." The Christian examples you cite, St Teresa of Avila and her buddy, St John of the Cross, who are among my favourites, belong to the mystical school of Christianity. I suggest you reread St Teresa's The Interior Castle as a treatise on the chakras. I find your comment, "If Hindus did not reciprocate on attacks made on them in the past, it is definitely not because of belief in ahimsa, but out of fear and a belief in blind fatalism..." to be without foundation and, more importantly, to provide a demonstration of your own ignorance and your tamasic and venomous nature. Similarly, your comment, "if missionaries are going around converting people, there must be something inherently wrong in Hinduism" is also without foundation and again serves to demonstrate your own ignorance and ill will. Hinduism like Judaism feels no need to prosletyze. Christianity, on the other hand, feels impelled to prosletyze. They cite as their authority John 14:6, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Also Matthew 22:9-10 has Jesus telling his servants [i.e. Christians] to bring to the wedding banquet "anyone you can find". Incredibly as it sounds, just today Archbishop Marcel Gervais (Roman Catholic) said in my local newspaper, "Catholics cannot claim to possess the entire truth, but we do believe that we have the essential truth." This pompous attitude is what prompts Christians to interfere with those holding other religious views. In Canada, the Christian Church is under legal siege for their mistreatment [i.e. cultural genocide] of aboriginal peoples in the beginning and middle of the last century. It is also under legal siege of for the sexual interference by priests toward minors during most of the last century. Many Christian orders are being forced to disband as their assets are being seized to satisfiy court judgements in both of these areas. Not a moment too soon in my opinion. It is too bad that Archbishop Gervais has failed to learn any lessons from this legal lesson that his church is being taught. Your uninformed rant about the caste system further betrays your ignorance and raises the suspicion that you are a closet missionary for those 'Christian' sects. Please take your hate messages to a fundamentalist 'Christian' website or group where they will be welcomed uncritically. You need to reread or perhaps read for the first time, the Bhagavad Gita. OM Namah Sivaya Omprem , Yoga man <childofdevi> wrote: > Namaste Ompremji! > > Your criticism of Catholicism stands out from all your > other knowledgeable and worthwhile posts. Every major > religion has had its share of terrorizing people in > the name of the religion, Catholocism being no > exception. Like other religions, Catholicism has also > produced a rich cornucopia of highly venerable saints. > St Teresa of Avila was a highly evolved yogini who > exhibited several siddhies such as levitation. The > bridal mysticism of St John of the cross equals that > of Mirabai. The soulful prayers of St Francis compares > with the devotional outpouring of Chaitanya > Mahaprabhu. > (BTW I am not catholic). The book Concentration by > Mouni Sadhu tells that many christian saints were > aware of yogic secrets akin to patanjali yogasutras. > > If Hindus did not reciprocate on attacks made on them > in the past, it is definitely not because of belief in > ahimsa, but out of fear and a belief in blind > fatalism(occasional a great soul like Madhava > Vidyaranya comes about to wake them out of this > fatalism, the reference is to systematic muslim > carnage in the 15 the century which ceased with the > formation of the Vijayanagar kingdom). Germs can cause > disease only if the immune system is weak. Likewise, > if missionaries are going around converting people, > there must be something inherently wrong in Hinduism > like the infernal caste system which systematically > kept the majority of people out of joys of well lived > religious life. Most people living in the west are > probably aware only of the benign side of Hinduism but > it has a sinister side too. I know of several people > of "lower" castes who converted because they could not > withstand insults. I was reading of the history of > Kerala, and several hundred years back, the lower > castes were forbidden to come in the sight of the > upper castes; and if the same person were to convert > to Islam or Christianity, he was treated as an equal. > If Hinduism did not engage in physical violence, it > engaged in the more insidious mental torture. What > other religion exists that treats its own adherents > worse than animals. Missionaries, by converting are > not bringing them closer to God but at least are > providing some self-respect. As Swami Vivekanada said, > Bharatavarsha has been and still is living in tamas > for the past 1000 years. People will eat pure rice > alone the whole day, keeping a "pure" diet and sleep > the whole day in the guise of "holiness"- a glaring > example of how tamas has been mistaken for sattwa. > > To those who would tell me that caste system was > ordained by God, I will refer them to the section of > the Santiparva of Mahabaharata where Bhisma lying on > the deathbed is giving advice to Yudhishtra, when Y. > asks him " What is the criteria for being a brahmin, > is it birth or character" to which Bhisma replies " > character alone decides who is a brahmin, birth is > immaterial". > > Aum Namasivaya, > yogaman > > > > Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site > http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2002 Report Share Posted October 20, 2002 Hello, > Germs can cause > disease only if the immune system is weak. Likewise, > if missionaries are going around converting people, > there must be something inherently wrong in Hinduism > like the infernal caste system which systematically > kept the majority of people out of joys of well lived > religious life. Most people living in the west are > probably aware only of the benign side of Hinduism but > it has a sinister side too. This reveals some of your inherent beliefs. Either you seem to believe that the Christian Missionaries can never be wrong or, that christains(or missionaries) are in some way superior to Hindus (provided, you exactly mean what you wrote). You are wrong. Some members already wrote why. Good luck S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 Dear S I request that you kindly read carefully what I have said and please do not add your own extrapolations as to what I meant. I said no such thing- all I meant I repeat(for the benefit of all other members who have twisted what I said) is that the people who are the object of conversion have been treated bady by their own Hindu brothers which really makes them easy to convert and as we Hindus should take remedial steps within our own attitudes to bring to Hinduism as a whole to its pristine purity. By "we" I do not mean you or me, I am referring to the average person. Unless you are an ostrich with its head buried under ground and totally out of touch with reality, you will realize what I am saying- read the newspaper daily. It is really the height of stupidity to suggest that this means that I am saying Christians are superior or Hindus are inferior. yogaman This reveals some of your inherent beliefs. Either you seem to believe that the Christian Missionaries can never be wrong or, that christains(or missionaries) are in some way superior to Hindus (provided, you exactly mean what you wrote). You are wrong. Some members already wrote why. Good luck S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.