Guest guest Posted October 20, 2002 Report Share Posted October 20, 2002 Greetings my own child of devi! thank you! but, really i do not deserve all that praise! i am as 'human' or as 'inhuman' as many people on this planet but i certainly try 'hard' every day to become a better human being - not necessarily a 'god-fearing' person but a 'god loving person.' also, i am not knowledgeble- the only real knowledge is when you realize the 'truth' i am far from "that" ... but, i am trying, though! but, research is what i do for an occupation and i am good at surfing on the web and present facts as i come across them! nothing that i write is original and is already known to most people... The stotra you are referring to is "MANISHA PANCHAKAM' WRITTEN BY ADI SHANKARA ! YES, "Shri Shankara has been criticized by modern western scholars for propounding sectarian beliefs in his commentary (bhashya) of Brahma sutra where he restricts the recitation of Vedas to the upper castes only. However, one should note that one is handicapped when writing a commentary on a text. Thus in independent compositions like the upadesasahasri and this short text, maniishhaa panchakam he expounds his Advaita philosophy in all its glory. Advaita, the non- dualistic philosophy expounded in detail by Shri Shankara, does not recognize differences between people based on caste, creed, religion, gender etc since we are all the manifestations of the same Brahman." CHILD OF DEVI, IF YOU LIKE I WILL EMAIL YOU THE FIVE BEAUTIFUL VERSES WITH THEIR ENGLISH TRANSLATION- - child of devi, YOU MENTION HOW CAN ONE REALIZE GOD ON AN EMPTY STOMACH? true! very true! even gautama buddha realized that ! he undertook huge penances and practiced severe austerities but was still miles and miles away from 'nirvana' UNTIL ONE DAY HE REALIZED that 'nirvana' cannot be attianed on an empty stomach AND A BUDDHA BIKSHINI BROUGHT HIIM SOME FOOD... AND HE REALIZED THAT YOU NEED SOME FOOD AT LEAST TO KEEP THE BODY AND SOUL TOGETHER... IT IS INTERESTING YOU SHOULD MENTION' POVERTY' -n sufism , there is a word called 'faqr' what does the word "faqr" mean? In the language of the sufis, faqr means being rich with god or nOn- dependent on anything otheR than god. but unlike hiduisn, in islam renunciation is purely spiritual or mental, not physical! a hindu santyasi or an ascetic may renounce his wife, kids, home and other worldly possessions. rather, this is considered total renunciation or tyagha - and a sadhu has only two possessions - a loin cloth and an alms bowl! but in Islam an ascetic need not renounce the world and sit in seclusion for good. What the Muslim ascetics do is that they live in the world, attend to its affairs, earn a livelihood, having full trust in God and believing that it is not their efforts which bring them bread, but it is through God's grace and kindness that they get what they get. so they do not run away from their duties ,pains and sorrows unlike the ascetics of other religions who do not face the world and take to seclusion for good. So in Sufism faqr does not means poverty. It means wealth and abundance, because a faqir in the real sense, is an extremely rich person who lives on spiritual and not physical wealth. That is why the Prophet (s.a.w.) said," Faqr is my Fakhr (pride)". i live in usa which is supposedly one of the richest countries in the world... the per capita income is high; every household has two cars; people own houses etc,,,, but still there is so much discontent and unhappiness! what is the use of owning the aerth and losing the soul? But you do make an interesting point- this was one reason why mother teresa nad her missionary sisters were able to convert so many hungry and homeless people on the streets of calcutta! she gave them dignity and self esteem when their own hindu brethern treated them like S*** (pardon my french) why do you think 3000 dalits embraced buddhism recently? please read dr. ambedkar's views on the caste system... if the indian government does not straighten up the act , india might become a 'christian' state! smiles! btw, veda vyasa mother was 'satyavati' the fisherwoman... also, did you know that sage narada's mother was a woman of ill repute? why do you think gandhiji went to london round table conference in a 'loin cloth' when he was ridiculed by the british presss for this immodest attire, he retorted " how can i wear a three piece suit when half of india is naked, hungry and homeless'? but seriously, child of devi! which is worse spiritual poverty or material poverty? love and love only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.