PUNCH MAKARA & FAECUS

[Guest guest]

Respected knowledgable ones,

pranaams,

well friends , i (well nothing against nebody or nebodys thought

process , well we are different individuals with different

lineage),for one would not agreee to FAECUS being termed as one of

the punch makaras , nno , its maans (meat) madira (alcohol) mudra

(pulses)matsya (fish) & maithuna .& as such for sure can say , that

FAECUS is not a prat of punchmakara at all.

also, from what little i know , a true sadhak would never talk shakti

sadhak would never talk ill about KAULA MARGA no matter whether its

in PASHU OR VEER OR THEN THE DIVYA form of practises. every soul , i

repeat every soul which walks on journey of spirituality , crosses

all paths & then to finally be one with supreme , & if somebody today

(or in this birth) is on divya level , then that does'nt mean he

never had been thru the earlier stages , well , naw , but rather

he/she must have completed all prior stages in previous births which

are many many.

anyways , despite being at much lower level , my friendly advise to

all sadhaks (especially thise foolowing shakti or shaiva) should

never ever talk ill of any path of a kaula , whether vamachar or

dakshina & imo , one should never try to prove his/her marga superior

to other.

regards,

JAI AMBEY MAHAKALI SHREE KAAL BHAIRAVAYA NAMAH,

rajat

[Guest guest]

My siddhi devis are the Dasha Mahavidyas and the Tantric path I follow is of

a kaula sampradaya, when I was taught of the pancha makara I had to do the

satvic version of it to appease the demi deities who protect the yantra of

Mother Kali. Without their help Kali sadhana is never done. The pancha

makara (or a version of it) includes faeces, some others incl. Elephant

meat, human stuff like that it is offered in three mundas (preferably those

of Brahmans).

 

Like I said I did the satvic or divya version of this in three inspired

coconuts, that was the only way I knew back then to call on dakini, varnini,

hakini and kakini the attributes of Kali, Chinnamasta and Tara devi.

 

I am not putting down anyone or anything. I don't have bias when I talk

about two schools of tantra that is just plain wrong. I apologise if you or

anyone else took any offence to this, but I am talking about stuff that I

have done and stuff that I have seen which works. Sometimes Devi takes a

filthy form (these forms I will not mention since Humans are not to worship

them but pretas), and to appease these forms you must offer something filthy

as well, like machindra tara devi or karana pishachini devi they all have

their custom pancha makara.

 

The pancha makara (the common form) is what you are referring to and I haven

't practiced that.