Guest guest Posted January 8, 2003 Report Share Posted January 8, 2003 My two paise: *** How does one get intiated into Shakti Sadhana in the US.*** It is possible to get initiated in the U.S., but it will take a while to find the connections you need. Do not rush it or try to force it. The old saying is that when the shishya is ready, the guru appears. For now, pray to your ishta to be your guru in the interim. Develop your body through hathayoga, your mind through study of Shakta scriptures, your emotions through immersion in Shakta hymns and chants, and your spirit through meditation on the Goddess and the cultivation of intense and total bhakti. Keep it simple and pure. Do not attempt special rituals you may have heard of on your own. Simply love and worship Her, and trust Her. This will more than suffice to get you started, and to set the cosmic wheels in motion. You will be given all that you need. I speak from experience. She will help you, and she will see to it that the guru you need will appear. When this moment arrives, there will be no mistaking it. *** Is there an means of getting electronic diksha? *** I know of organizations that offer this, but I regard such things as highly suspect. Remember that Shaktism has been the religion of the masses in India -- the people of the land, the country places and villages, the tribal communities, the fringe areas. Shaktism has developed more sophisticated systems, yes -- some of the most beautiful and elaborate in the world. But they do not change the essence of the experience, which is total devotion to the Goddess. They speed things up, focus you more sharply -- but the basics that you need before you are ready to ascend to those heights are entirely reachable on your own. It is better to simply practice as best you can, rather than spend that time trying to find someone to give you diksha or any particular seal of approval. Just do it. The guru will come in time. Be patient. *** I am considering just practicing on my own. Is that really not advisable? *** I think my statements above pretty much summarize my views on the topic. I am sure that others may feel differently, and I hope they will add their feelings as well, to help you find your answer. Thank you for posting and please return often. ;-) Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2003 Report Share Posted January 8, 2003 --- "Rudra Joe" wrote: > The vajrayana path is also a shakta path. I agree. > To those who think Hindu dharma is all there is I will > reiterate something you also know - Shakyamuni was the last > avatar of Vishnu. That is quite a sensitive point of contention amongst various Buddhists. The (anti-Hindu) Buddhists who completely reject this statement do so on the grounds that this Buddha-avatar theory is a pathetic attempt by fundamentalist Vaishnavites to subjugate Buddhism back into their fold. Other Buddhist traditions like the vajrayanists and tantrists are indeed discreetly sympathetic to this avatar theory. However, they have replaced Vishnu with Vairochana - the eternal Buddha of which Shakyamuni is an avatar. This is probably an exercise in diplomacy; out of consideration for the feelings of their anti-Vaishnavite Buddhist associates (who are, indeed, in the majority). Who is to judge which of these Buddhist camps is correct on the avatar issue? Us hindus? LOL Well, anyway, the 'V' is still there. AUM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.