Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 "Sacagawea, who accompanied [us on] that long, dangerous and fatiguing route to the Pacific Ocean and back, deserved a greater reward for her attention and services on that route than we had in our power to give her." -- L.M. Clark Most Shakti Sadhana members who are located in the U.S. will already know something of Sacagawea, the Native American woman who -- as a teenager with a newborn baby -- acted as a guide to (and arguably saved) the arduous Lewis & Clarke survey expedition to the Pacific in 1804-06. Those who didn't learn about her in school most likely discovered her when the U.S. Mint released a one-dollar coin bearing her image: The history of Sacagawea's life is sketchy, shrouded in mystery and myth. Much of what we know has been passed down through oral history by the Hidatsa, Shoshone and Comanche Indian tribes. Not a great deal is known about her as a young woman and even less is known about her later life. But what we do know is remarkable. At about the age of 11, Sacagawea was captured by an Hidatsa raiding party and taken from her Shoshone tribe. She was later sold into slavery with the Missouri River Mandans. They then sold her (or gave her away in a bet) to Toussaint Charbonneau, a French-Canadian fur trader, who made her his wife. When Sacagawea was about 15 and six months pregnant, Charbonneau was hired by Captains Lewis and Clark, not so much for his own skills but for those of Sacagawea. She knew several Indian languages, and being Shoshone, could help Lewis and Clark make contact with her people and acquire horses that were crucial to the success of the mission. In fact, Sacagawea did help Lewis and Clark find the Shoshone and trade for the horses they needed. But her contribution far exceeded anything Lewis and Clark had bargained for. She provided crucial knowledge of the topography of some of the most rugged country of North America and taught the explorers how to find edible roots and plants previously unknown to European-Americans. With her infant son bound to her back, she single-handedly rescued Captain Clark's journals from the Missouri whitewater when their boat capsized. If she had not, much of the record of the first year of the expedition would have been lost to history. Most crucially, however, Sacagawea and her infant served as a "white flag" of peace for the expedition, which was as much a military expedition as a scientific one. They entered potentially hostile territory well armed but undermanned compared to the Native American tribes they met. Because no war party was ever accompanied by a woman and infant, the response of the Native Americans was curiosity, not aggression. They talked first, and Sacagawea often served as the translator. Not a single member of the party was lost to hostile action. It is not surprising that after their trip ended, the adventurers felt a lifelong debt to Sacagawea. In fact, Clark wrote to Charbonneau that Sacagawea deserved a greater reward than what the expedition gave her. His sense of indebtedness to Sacagawea is reflected by Clark's accepting, a few years later, responsibility for educating Sacagawea's son and, after Sacagawea's death at the age of 25, for a daughter as well. Sacagawea's grave is in Lander, WY. Source: http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/golden_dollar_coin/index.cfm? flash=yes&action=about_sacagawea There is also a wonderful article appearing in the current edition of National Geographic, and excerpted here: (http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0302/feature4/index.html). Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 Thank you Devi Bhakta for posting this. It's wonderful to read about. Recently there was a Conscious Living Expo in Los Angeles which I unfortunately missed, but it featured the work of a woman named Joanelle Romero, whom I think is an Apache. She has made a movie detailing the whites' treatment of Native Americans. A friend told me about it, and apparently the movie tells that Hitler had greatly admired how the whites decimated the native population here in America. I didn't realize that, although I recall seeing a symbol on a building in California that looked like a swastika. Someone told me it was an Indian (Native American) symbol. I wondered if Hitler stole that from the Native Americans. Though someone else recently told me that the swastika is a Sanskrit letter turned backwards. Do you know if this is true? So, I guess Joanelle Romero is trying to get funding for her film, which is currrently only 30 min. long, but she wants to turn it into a full-length movie. If anyone's interested, info can be found at www.rednation.com. , "Devi Bhakta <devi_bhakta>" <devi_bhakta> wrote: > "Sacagawea, who accompanied [us on] that long, dangerous and > fatiguing route to the Pacific Ocean and back, deserved a greater > reward for her attention and services on that route than we had in > our power to give her." -- L.M. Clark > > Most Shakti Sadhana members who are located in the U.S. will already > know something of Sacagawea, the Native American woman who -- as a > teenager with a newborn baby -- acted as a guide to (and arguably > saved) the arduous Lewis & Clarke survey expedition to the Pacific in > 1804-06. Those who didn't learn about her in school most likely > discovered her when the U.S. Mint released a one-dollar coin bearing > her image: > > The history of Sacagawea's life is sketchy, shrouded in mystery and > myth. Much of what we know has been passed down through oral history > by the Hidatsa, Shoshone and Comanche Indian tribes. Not a great deal > is known about her as a young woman and even less is known about her > later life. But what we do know is remarkable. > > At about the age of 11, Sacagawea was captured by an Hidatsa raiding > party and taken from her Shoshone tribe. She was later sold into > slavery with the Missouri River Mandans. They then sold her (or gave > her away in a bet) to Toussaint Charbonneau, a French-Canadian fur > trader, who made her his wife. > > When Sacagawea was about 15 and six months pregnant, Charbonneau was > hired by Captains Lewis and Clark, not so much for his own skills but > for those of Sacagawea. She knew several Indian languages, and being > Shoshone, could help Lewis and Clark make contact with her people and > acquire horses that were crucial to the success of the mission. > > In fact, Sacagawea did help Lewis and Clark find the Shoshone and > trade for the horses they needed. But her contribution far exceeded > anything Lewis and Clark had bargained for. She provided crucial > knowledge of the topography of some of the most rugged country of > North America and taught the explorers how to find edible roots and > plants previously unknown to European-Americans. With her infant son > bound to her back, she single-handedly rescued Captain Clark's > journals from the Missouri whitewater when their boat capsized. If > she had not, much of the record of the first year of the expedition > would have been lost to history. > > Most crucially, however, Sacagawea and her infant served as a "white > flag" of peace for the expedition, which was as much a military > expedition as a scientific one. They entered potentially hostile > territory well armed but undermanned compared to the Native American > tribes they met. Because no war party was ever accompanied by a woman > and infant, the response of the Native Americans was curiosity, not > aggression. They talked first, and Sacagawea often served as the > translator. Not a single member of the party was lost to hostile > action. > > It is not surprising that after their trip ended, the adventurers > felt a lifelong debt to Sacagawea. In fact, Clark wrote to > Charbonneau that Sacagawea deserved a greater reward than what the > expedition gave her. His sense of indebtedness to Sacagawea is > reflected by Clark's accepting, a few years later, responsibility for > educating Sacagawea's son and, after Sacagawea's death at the age of > 25, for a daughter as well. Sacagawea's grave is in Lander, WY. > > Source: > http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/golden_dollar_coin/index. cfm? > flash=yes&action=about_sacagawea > There is also a wonderful article appearing in the current edition of > National Geographic, and excerpted here: > (http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0302/feature4/index ..html). > > Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 Hi Maryann: I'm glad to hear you liked the post; Nora liked the story so much I'm going to send her little daughter a Sacagawea dollar as a keepsake next time I send a snail mail ... Now, about the swastika. You write, "Someone told me it was an Indian (Native American) symbol. I wondered if Hitler stole that from the Native Americans. Though someone else recently told me that the swastika is a Sanskrit letter turned backwards. Do you know if this is true?" Well, the details are a little off, but yes, it's basically true. The swastika is not a Sanskrit letter; it's a symbol of good fortune and auspiciousness. Hitler decided it was a primal Aryan symbol; however - - budding artist that he was -- decided to flip it around and turn it on its side (so much for good fortune and auspiciousness, eh?). His ethnography was also weak: The symbol is not "Aryan" at all; it seems to have arisen independently in many cultures -- Hindu, Celtic, Native American and many others. Hindus still employ the swastika in religious iconography -- you'll often see it, for instance, in pictures of Ganesh and Lakshmi (good fortune deities). Here is a nice explanation written about eight years ago by Nandini Garud, a Hindu woman, to a Jewish correspondent who suggested that Hindus ought to dump the symbol out of respect for the millions murdered by the Nazis (I've invited Nandini to join the Group; hope she does!): "I am distressed that one of your readers wants Swastikas removed from Hindu temples. Swastika is an ancient symbol which occurs all over the world, in Indian as well as Native American cultures. "Swasti" literally means "Well-being" (Su asti) in Sanskrit. Swastika stands for the forward movement of Sun-God's chariot, which in turn means enlightenment, progress, and optimism. Hindus have always used Swastikas for benevolent purposes. Swastikas were used at cross-roads with the right arm pointing to East to re-orient travelers in the "right" direction. Swastika with the Cross at its heart invites opposites to meet at the "Center" and become One. Your readers perhaps are not aware that Mahatma Gandhi, the champion of non-violence, cried out for war against the Nazi Germany. Incensed by the Nazi atrocities against humanity, Indians who wore Crosses, Kirpans, Swastikas, and many other emblems, set aside their top priority of freedom from the British. Heirs of the Glorious Swastika joined the allied forces to stop the onslaught of Nazistika. Fifty years later you want to banish Swastikas that over thousands of years gave wisdom, courage, hope, and security to countless billions? A Jewish expert has assured me that Hitler's Swastika was different, but she too feels Swastika is a symbol of hate! Hindus and their sister-faiths have done nothing to deserve such defamation of their symbols. I think it is about time we called the slanted and disoriented symbol of Nazi party Nazistika, and restore the original meaning to the auspicious Swastika. We must not let this semantical idiocy compromise our harmony and friendship. The word "Swasti" occurs in one of our most precious invocations which asks for blessings for the entire Earth. Are you going to ask us to change our sacred mantras as well? Even as I write this I feel it is impossible that people belonging to such an ancient faith as Judaism would ever want to destroy the emblem of another faith in such a cruel manner. Please assure me Jews do not mean to take away another faith's holy symbols. Tell me please, how I can assure my friends on the Net that this talk about erasing our heritage is just that - talk. -Nandini Y. Garud P.S. Many Hindu temples in Northern America have already adopted "Aum" instead of the traditional Swastika out of respect for the Jewish sentiment. Now "Aum" and "Supreme Truth" are being abused to identify terrorism with which neither Buddhists, nor Hindus, Jains, or Sikhs have any connection. Can our friends in media stop using Aum and Supreme Truth negatively, so we are not forced to revert to our original Swastika, which hurts your feelings so? For the sake of communal harmony, respond appropriately. -Nandini Source: http://www.hindunet.org/alt_hindu/1995_Jul_1/msg00042.html For more on the subject, here's an article called, "Nazi Swastika or Ancient Symbol? Time to Learn the Difference": http://www.iearn.org/hgp/aeti/aeti-1997/swastika.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.