Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

About the law of karma?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I have very little to say about it -- but it will still take two and a half

hours! The law of karma, in the first place, is not a law. That word gives it an

aroma as if it is something scientific, like the law of gravitation. It is

merely a hope, not a law at all. It has been hoped for centuries that if you do

good you will attain to good results. It is a human hope in existence which is

absolutely neutral.

 

If you look at nature, there are laws -- the whole of science is nothing but

discovery of those laws -- but science has not come even close to detecting

anything like the law of karma. Yes, it is certain that any action is going to

bring certain reactions, but the law of karma is hoping for much more. If you

simply say any action is bound to produce some reactions, it is possible to have

scientific support for it. But man is hoping for much more. He is asking that a

good action inevitably brings a good consequence with it, and the same with a

bad action.

 

Now, there are many things implied in this. First, What is good? Each society

defines good according to itself. What is good to a Jew is not good to a Jaina;

what is good to a Christian is not good to a Confucian. Not only that, what is

good in one culture is bad in another culture. A law has to be universal. For

example, if you heat water to one hundred degrees centigrade, it will evaporate

-- in Tibet, in Russia, in America, even in Oregon. In Oregon it will be a

little puzzled, but all the same at one hundred degrees water will evaporate.

Certainly the law of karma is neither a scientific law nor part of any legal

system.

 

Then what kind of law is it? It is a hope. A man wandering in immense darkness,

groping his way, clings to anything that gives a little hope, a little light --

because what you observe in life itself is something totally different from the

law of karma. A man who is a well-known criminal may succeed and become the

president, the prime minister; or vice versa: he was not a criminal before, but

when he becomes the president or prime minister of a country he becomes a

criminal... So in life this strange situation happens: bad people reach good

positions, become respectable or honored, not only in their time but throughout

history. It is full of their names. In history, Gautam Buddha, Mahavira, Kanad,

Gautam, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Lieh Tzu -- people like these you will not find

even in the footnotes. And Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane,

Nadirshah, Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler -- they make up the major portion of

history. In fact, we have to write the whole of history

again because all these people have to be completely erased. Even the memory of

them should not be carried on, because even their memory may have evil effects

on people.

 

A better humanity will not give these names even a place in the footnotes; there

is no need. They were nightmares; it is better they are completely forgotten so

they don't follow you like shadows. And we have to discover people who have

lived on this earth and made it in every way beautiful; shared their joy, their

dance, their music, shared their ecstasies -- but lived anonymously. People have

completely forgotten even their names. To me, certainly each action has its

result, but not somewhere far away in a future life. The action and the result

are continuous, they are part of one process. Do you think sowing the seed and

reaping the crop are separate? It is one process. What begins in sowing the

seed, grows, and one day the one seed has become thousands of seeds. That's what

you call your crop. It is the same seed which has exploded into thousands of

seeds. No death is intervening, no afterlife is needed; it is a continuum.

 

So the one thing to be remembered is: in my vision of life, yes, every action is

bound to have some consequences, but they will not be somewhere else, you will

have them here and now. Most probably you will get them almost simultaneously.

When you are kind to someone, don't you feel a certain joy? A certain peace? A

certain meaningfulness? Don't you feel that you are contented with what you have

done? There is a kind of deep satisfaction. Have you ever felt that contentment

when you are angry, when you are boiling with anger, when you hurt somebody,

when you are mad with rage? Have you ever felt a peace, a silence descending in

you? No, it is impossible. You will certainly feel something, but it will be a

sadness that you again acted like a fool, that again you have done the same

stupid thing that you decided again and again not to do. You will feel a

tremendous unworthiness in yourself. You will feel that you are not a man but a

machine, because you don't respond, you react. A man

may have done something, and you reacted. That man had the key in his hands,

and you just danced according to his desire; he had power over you. When

somebody abuses you and you start fighting, what does it mean? It means that you

don't have any capacity not to react.

 

Osho, From Personality to Individuality,chapter 9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...