Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 onsdagen den 23 juli 2003 04.36 skrev Ganeshspam: > The findings not only confirmed > that there was one source of DNA for all life on Earth, but also enabled > the scientists to trace the evolutionary process – how more complex > organisms evolved, genetically, from simpler ones, adopting at each stage > the genes of a lower life form to create a more complex higher life form – > culminating with Homo sapiens. You can find the same materials, plastic, metal, etc., and the same components, screws and nuts, levers, sheets etc., in a space ship, in an ocean going ship, in a sewing machine, in a computer. Since they have the same components in them, constructed in a similar way, does that mean that they all have evolved from each other, from some kind of "original" machine? So finding the same DNA in different kinds of life on earth, does not imply evolution in any kind of way. That scientists think that all the time, just shows that they have a certain agenda to fulfill with their thoughts. My computer, that I am using, have certainly not evolved by itself from my previous computer. Still, it uses the same kind of components, looks pretty similar and is an advancement from its predecessor. Oh, I wish my processor could evolve to a more modern kind of Intel processor, with more megahertz and whatever. But alas, it does not. So disappointing. I have to throw it away, and buy a new one, to get that evolutionary improvement. Evolution, when it comes to computers, is in human thought. Not in material. The nature of material is to de-evolve and disintegrate, the nature of thought is to evolve. Only by adding the energy of thought and life, to dead matter, does it evolve. There is no reason that what we see in nature should act in any other way. Prisni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Like to share my favourite quote : "As man can produce, and certainly has produced, a great result by his methodical and unconscious means of selection, what may not natural selection effect? Man can act on external and visible characters: Nature, if I may allowed to personify the natural preservation or survival of the fittest, cares nothing for appearances, except in so far as they are useful to any being. SHE can act on every internal organ, on every shade of constitutional difference, on the whole machinery of life. Man selects only for his own good: Nature only for that of the being which SHE tends. Every selected character is fully exercised by HER, …." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.