Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Dear Yogaman: First, thanks for your kind words on my post (and for the bonus compliment on the Mother Mantangini painting). *** Just wanted to add that as one advances, yoga and tantra are not disparate; there is no yoga without tantra and vice versa. *** I'd be interested to hear more of your thoughts. Our estemmed member, OmPrem, has posted authoritatively on the relationship between Kundalini Yoga and Hatha Yoga. One of our co-moderators, Kochu, noted "The Vamachara [or] Left-Hand Path ... is essentially Kundalini Yoga. ... It is also called the Kaula Path." Could you elaborate? Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Dear Yogaman: As I noted in my previous post "Our estemmed member, OmPrem, has posted authoritatively on the relationship between Kundalini Yoga and Hatha Yoga. One of our co-moderators, Kochu, noted "The Vamachara [or] Left-Hand Path ... is essentially Kundalini Yoga. ... In case you may find it useful, I dug up these three old posts which took a look at this topic. The first is mine, the second is Kochu's, and the third is Om Prem's: /message/1158 /message/1172 /message/1196 DB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 dear devi bhakta, Reading the three interesting posts you had pulled up i thought i could add a my two cents. 1. Because of the "branding" trend, certain classical processes have bcome identified with particular forms of yoga taught by modern teachers. Thus kundalini yoga which is the same as kundalini tantra which is the same as tantra yoga is confused with "kundalini yoga" as taught by yogi bhajan etc.just as Pattabhi Jois has "trademarked" his palace gym. influeneced yogasana performace as "ashtanga yoga" of patanjali, as though the other yogas are not part of Patanjali's ashtanga yoga) 2. The massive influence of Iyengar, Jois and othe monk/renunciation oriented yoga teachers has almoost obliterated the importance of the natha sampradayas' contribution to yoga. The yoga as taught by Goraksha/Matsyendra natha is nothing but tantra yoga ie yoga asana pranayama and bandhas and mudras practiced with the aim of attaing the tantric goal of raising the kundalini throught the chakras to unite with Shiva at the crown. Since there are sexual aspects of tantra there are the parctices of yoga which help these..like vajroli veeparitakarini and the other bandhas and mudras etc.WE should not forget that a lot of yoga i geared toward retention of the three jewels. This is also the same as kriya yoga which uses asanas, prnayama bandhas and mudras to the same "tantric" end. In his introduction to "Tattva Shuddhi" Swami Satyasangaananda says "Today yoga is practiced in almost every corner of the world, but we do not really see any transformation in the conciousness of mankind. Where does the fault lie?Is it in the practice itself? Not likely.....it is more likely that the fault lies in the way we practice our sadhana: a bit of this and a bit of that, when ever we care to do it.In order to eliminate this lop-sided approach to yoga , we will have to pay greater attention to the philosophy and practices of tantra which is the source of yoga" And as Kochu had pointed out in his post Srividya is kundaliniyoga or kundalini tantra . What the yogi does through asanas and pranayama is achieved here through mantas amd mudras and the worship of the srichakra. Tantra is the root of yoga in the sense of joining(shiva/shakti) is the fruit of tantra. thanks for letting me share my thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.