Replies

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 7/23/03 8:07:30 AM Central Daylight Time, sisterusha writes:

> It is certainly true that Max Mueller was a racist trying to prove the

superiority of the European >

 

Thank you! The point I am trying to make is the the Aryans were NOT

superior--that's exactly WHY they took dravidian culture and morphed it into

their own!

 

In a message dated 7/23/03 9:40:20 AM Central Daylight Time, sekhmetsat writes:

> the Aryan invasion theory has been DIS-proved....

 

No it hasn't--you can't tell me that the findings --proof of Shiva, mind you--at

harappa and Mohenjo Daro and the finding s that there was violence and proof

that one culture took ovver another are not proof--it's solid evidence.

 

In a message dated 7/23/03 10:07:01 AM Central Daylight Time, ashwini_puralasamy

writes: > "And my feeling is that one day we are going to attain a society >

which will be harmonious, which will be far better than all the ideas >

 

I think so--utopian anarchy...

 

In a message dated 7/23/03 10:19:26 AM Central Daylight Time, coolthurber

writes: > Hope springs eternal in the human heart. As they say.....the lamb and

the lion will be side by side ......

 

what a beautiful quote!

 

ANY POST THAT IS INSULTING AND/OR DISRESPECTFUL IN TONE, OR THAT ATTACKS OR

DENIGRATES OTHER MEMBERS AND/OR THEIR

 

I am female. I don't think that's disrespectful. If i am attacked--i'm going to

defend myself--that's karma--action. it's not disrespect--I think we're havy a

heavy debate. Why is that so bad--everyone on this list seems frightened about

disagreeing...it's the way of the world which is what makes utopian anarchy a

difficult task to move toward.

 

M

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 7/24/03 8:05:37 AM Central Daylight Time,

sekhmetsat writes:

 

> i am not denying proof of Shiva in the Indus valley civilization.... i am

> saying that modern archeologists looked again those cities and did not see the

> same things the nineteenth century people did... because an old city is in

> ruins, does not mean it was destroyed... and i know there were thre skeltons

> found in one of the cities i think, one with a hole in his head, but they

> dated to AFTER the cities were abandoned... the indus valley cities were

> abandoned because the Saraswati river dried up, not because violent whites on

> chariots slaughtered them.... matter of fact the first translation of the

indus

>

 

I am quite aware of Rudra and the hymns...and I was not referring to the

skeleton with the bullett..there have been other finding that proved that war

had

happened BEYOND things that you refer to--ie. other skeletons with wounds,

etc. Just because a city is in ruin is NOT why I have said this--I say this

because it is based on archeological findings...findings other than your

skeleton

man.

M

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

i am not denying proof of Shiva in the Indus valley civilization.... i am saying

that modern archeologists looked again those cities and did not see the same

things the nineteenth century people did... because an old city is in ruins,

does not mean it was destroyed... and i know there were thre skeltons found in

one of the cities i think, one with a hole in his head, but they dated to AFTER

the cities were abandoned... the indus valley cities were abandoned because the

Saraswati river dried up, not because violent whites on chariots slaughtered

them.... matter of fact the first translation of the indus valley script was a

hymn to Rudra

 

TTIREM3 wrote:

 

you can't tell me that the findings --proof of Shiva, mind you--at harappa and

Mohenjo Daro and the finding s that there was violence and proof that one

culture took ovver another are not proof--it's solid evidence.