Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Hello Friends-I am the one who posted one of the warnings re the Aryan question. I have lived in an ashram in Los Angeles for 20 years where this Aryan invasion issue is often discussed, so I am aware of all the evidence one way or the other. One of the main arguements of the invasion theory is linguistic. Sanskrit is in a line of ancient languages that can be traced from India,through the ancient civilizations of what is now Iran, north into possibly Eastern Europe. Over time languages tend to simplify rather than become more complicated, just as Pali is a more linguistically simple form of Sanskrit. The ancient language in Iran, used by proto-Zoroastrians, is more complicated than Sanskrit, with the complexity increasing northwards. Thus it is assumed that the people moved towards the South, into India rather than away from it. This theory coupled with the number of battles recorded in the Vedas seem to form the foundation of invasion theory. But here's my question- could it be that modern people are making a complete mistake by categorizing the ancients rigidly into tribes, peoples and kingdoms? Could it be that the human tendency to record battles and ignore uneventful daily living has given us a false impression? Think of how Sept. 11 will probably be recorded in history:the day America was attacked. The truth is that there were victims from all over the globe on that day, not to mention the fact that "Americans" also are people from all over the globe. India also has been a melting pot for many cultures over the millenia. To my mind, all we can really say for sure is that several cultures existed in ancient India, probably more harmoniously than recorded events lead us to believe. We will never know who they really were and where they came from, or if they "came" at all. Meanwhile the excavations continue at Mohenjo daro and Harappa. Fascinating! And then there's this-the Mayan(?) ruins in Central America seem to show a direct connection with the temples in So. India. Personally I think modern people have been a little arrogant looking back at the ancients, considering them unsophisticated because they could not build WMDs and Stealth bombers and the like. Could it be that we white folks, who have done a pretty good job of invading the whole world, imagine invasions everywhere? Cultures probably shifted quite a bit more than we suppose, and not always because of invasions or famines. Two cents worth on caste. What about the fact that, in the Rg Veda, caste does not appear to be hereditary? Jai Ma, Gitaprana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.