Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Satish: When you listen to Mary Ann, do you not hear the voice of Mother seeking to break free from ages of male dominance. Listen from the heart and notice that Kali Ma dances upon the corpse of Lord Shiva. Ma must break free during Kali Yuga for the journey to continue.(Only my humble opinion) Warren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 I think marriage is a cruel and unusual punishment ...but if people want to do it I guess they should. Of course I am in favor of abolishing the whole institution except for the raising of children...and it would be null and void as soon as those children came of age. that means we would revert to the midlevel costume of proving pregnancy before the vows could be taken. except in the case of adoption you could be married if you adopted a child but that too would only last until the child came of age. And of course people too old to reproduce would not be able to marry. Pretty radical huh? Of course we could just bud out of peoples personal lives and let them do what the heck they wanted to do with their lives...but that would be even more radical. Hugs In a message dated 1/29/2004 8:55:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, megalith6 writes: > > Hi m6: > > > > That's nice to hear. But there's no denying that the effects of > the > > "rule and practice" that says marriage should only be between a > > man and a woman harms people. > > I'm not quite sure whose 'rule and practice' you are referring to; > the consensus of majorities cuts no ice with me, never has done . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2004 Report Share Posted February 8, 2004 As an astrologer, I have seen planetary reasons to marry and not to marry. A person with the planet Uranus in the seventh house would do well to avoid a legal agreement and craft their own, less conventional compact based upon equality and daily choice. A couple with strong Jupiter aspects will definitely want public approval and sanction and will often find great happiness in marriage. The real problem is monomania: one god, one, one partner, one job for a lifetime etc. Perhaps the computer pandit who foresaw nine jobs for a lifetime instead of one should have extended his forecast to include nine deities, nine partners, etc Prema m6 wrote: > 'Marriage' appears to be, at root, a patriarchal institution, whereby > > a husband 'owns' a wife. > > No-one owns anyone. > > Talk about Maya! > > , MaryJWoodworth@a... wrote: > > I think marriage is a cruel and unusual punishment ...but if people > want to > > do it I guess they should. Of course I am in favor of abolishing > the whole > > institution except for the raising of children...and it would be > null and void as soon as those children came of age. that means we > would revert to the > > midlevel costume of proving pregnancy before the vows could be > taken. except in the case of adoption you could be married if you > adopted a child but that too would only last until the child came of > age. And of course people too old to reproduce would not be able to > marry. Pretty radical huh? Of course we could just bud out of > peoples personal lives and let them do what the heck they wanted to > do with their lives...but that would be even more radical. > > > > Hugs > > > > > > In a message dated 1/29/2004 8:55:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, > > megalith6@h... writes: > > > > > > > > Hi m6: > > > > > > > > That's nice to hear. But there's no denying that the effects > of > > > the > > > > "rule and practice" that says marriage should only be between a > > > > man and a woman harms people. > > > > > > I'm not quite sure whose 'rule and practice' you are referring > to; > > > the consensus of majorities cuts no ice with me, never has > done . . > > > Sponsor [click here] > > ------------------------------ > Links > > * > / > > * > > > * Terms of > Service. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2004 Report Share Posted February 9, 2004 In a message dated 2/8/2004 3:00:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, megalith6 writes: > > 'Marriage' appears to be, at root, a patriarchal institution, whereby > a husband 'owns' a wife. > > No-one owns anyone. > > Thank you!!!!! yes! yes !yes! why can't a person just spend time with who so ever they chose to spend time with and as long as they are willing ? remember this? "I will do my thing and you do your thing I am not in this world to live up to your expectations and you are not in this world to live up to mine You are you and I am I and if by chance we find each other its beautiful" by Frederick Pearls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.