Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 I received the following from Adi Shakti probably now a member with a different id. I dont know the source of these and did not ask her. Rgds --- adi ma <adi_shakthi16 wrote: > Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:09:37 -0800 (PST) > adi ma <adi_shakthi16 > putra kameshti slokas > satisharigela > > > For having children: > > 1. Devakisutam Govindam Vasudevam Jagatpatim > DehimeTanayam Krishna twam-aham Sharanagatah. > > To have a son: > > 1. Sarvabadhabinirmukto dhanadhanyasutanvitah > > Manushyo tatprasaden bhavishyati na samshayah > > 2. Om hrim lajja jjalyam thah thah lah om hrim svaha > > For safety of the child in the womb: > > 1. Om tham tham thim thim thum them thaim thoum thah > thah om Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Namaste, I don't see one for having a daughter. However, it would also be interesting if anyone could translate these for me. Many blessings, prainbow , Satish Arigela <satisharigela> wrote: > I received the following from Adi Shakti probably now > a member with a different id. > I dont know the source of these and did not ask her. > > Rgds > --- adi ma <adi_shakthi16> wrote: > > Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:09:37 -0800 (PST) > > adi ma <adi_shakthi16> > > putra kameshti slokas > > satisharigela > > > > > > For having children: > > > > 1. Devakisutam Govindam Vasudevam Jagatpatim > > DehimeTanayam Krishna twam-aham Sharanagatah. > > > > To have a son: > > > > 1. Sarvabadhabinirmukto dhanadhanyasutanvitah > > > > Manushyo tatprasaden bhavishyati na samshayah > > > > 2. Om hrim lajja jjalyam thah thah lah om hrim svaha > > > > For safety of the child in the womb: > > > > 1. Om tham tham thim thim thum them thaim thoum thah > > thah om > > > > Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 , "prainbow61" <paulie- rainbow@u...> wrote: > Namaste, > > I don't see one for having a daughter. However, it would also be > interesting if anyone could translate these for me. > > > 1. Devakisutam Govindam Vasudevam Jagatpatim > > > DehimeTanayam Krishna twam-aham Sharanagatah Born of Devaki, Govinda, Vasudeva, Jagatpati- Lord of universe,Krishna, I seek refuge in you, grant me a son. > > > 1. Sarvabadhabinirmukto dhanadhanyasutanvitah > > > > > > Manushyo tatprasaden bhavishyati na samshayah Humans will be released from all difficulties, and become wealthy(with food,money and sons) by your grace without doubt. It doesnt address any particluar devata. The remaining two cant be translated into English. Rgds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 "satisharigela wrote: I dont know the source of these and did not ask her." I remember the last time when somebody came here and ask the same question about conception, 2 people [ one of which is me ]responded and give details plus some mantras etc. You reacted strongly and told us off that we shouldn't be doing such a thing. I will try to retract that particular message. So my question is why do you make an exception this time? and Not knowing the source? Perhaps in future, you could consult the moderators first before posting messages from an Id you are not sure off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 , "N. Madasamy" <ashwini_puralasamy> wrote: > I remember the last time when somebody came here and ask the same > question about conception, 2 people [ one of which is me ] >responded > and give details plus some mantras etc. You reacted strongly and told > us off that we shouldn't be doing such a thing. Do what thing? Can you explain? It will help if you can tell me the message number. What did I strongly react to? To mantras being posted on any forum? > Perhaps in future, you could consult the moderators first before > posting messages from an Id you are not sure off. Will do so. I did not know you have an objection to her messages. I received them from her id adi_shakti16 and she added "you may post them to and give me credit". I thought she might want them posted. So I did and acknowledged. I would have posted regardless of who sent them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Dear Satish: Not to worry. None of this is particularly surprising (or particularly interesting) at this late date. We've seen this sort of foolishness before; and we'll surely see it again in various forms. Whatever. My only comment concerns this line: *** she added "you may post them to and give me credit". *** Let me reiterate the group's rule that anyone posting information taken "cut 'n' paste" from another site should, at the very least, acknowledge the source -- and certainly should not, under any circumstance, untruthfully (and perhaps illegally) present the work as their own. For the record, the source of this information is not your gentle correspondent, but http://www.astrojyoti.com/mantras4.htm Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 It is with a specific reason I said I do not know mantras and asked the person to simply pray. There are mantras for everything including making pregnent a woman who has not had sexual intercourse. It is a bhairava mantra. But these are all "prayoga" to be done in an emergency and being prayogas the mechanics can be learnt only with instruction from a person who has walked the walk. It cannot be done via net or telephone. But reciting LS etc. with devotion for general wellbeing etc. is OK. but once it turns into a"Prayoga" one requires to be strict on the rules which is a different ballgame alltogether. It is when they are not followed there is either no results. The mantra quoted is NOT putrakameshti mantra but Santhanagopala. Putrakameshti is an "ishti" or "yaga" or "sacrifice". It is a vaidik ritual lasting a few days and it uses hundreds of veda mantras and requires scores of vaideekas. It also costs a lot. The last putrakameshti that Ihave heard of was conducted more than 30 years ago. when long winded responses that are not of much use except as a piece if information are needed I prefer to say "I dunno" than to say things that will be of use to none. Kochu Satish Arigela <satisharigela wrote: I received the following from Adi Shakti probably now a member with a different id. I dont know the source of these and did not ask her. Rgds --- adi ma <adi_shakthi16 wrote: > Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:09:37 -0800 (PST) > adi ma <adi_shakthi16 > putra kameshti slokas > satisharigela > > > For having children: > > 1. Devakisutam Govindam Vasudevam Jagatpatim Dehime Tanayam Krishna twam-aham Sharanagatah. > > To have a son: > > 1. Sarvabadhabinirmukto dhanadhanyasutanvitah > > Manushyo tatprasaden bhavishyati na samshayah > > 2. Om hrim lajja jjalyam thah thah lah om hrim svaha > > For safety of the child in the womb: > > 1. Om tham tham thim thim thum them thaim thoum thah > thah om Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam / Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 Namaste DB and all, I don't know anything about this site that you have listed as a link and probably can't evaluate it properly, but it reminds me of little spell books sold in occult and metaphysical stores. They're attractive to folks who are not serious practictioners of the faith and don't want to trouble themselves with ethical questions etc. This little books are not generally favored by serious witches and pagans. Is there a similarity here or am I mistaken? prainbow , "Devi Bhakta" <devi_bhakta> wrote: > Dear Satish: > > Not to worry. None of this is particularly surprising (or > particularly interesting) at this late date. We've seen this sort of > foolishness before; and we'll surely see it again in various forms. > Whatever. My only comment concerns this line: > > *** she added "you may post them to and give me > credit". *** > > Let me reiterate the group's rule that anyone posting information > taken "cut 'n' paste" from another site should, at the very least, > acknowledge the source -- and certainly should not, under any > circumstance, untruthfully (and perhaps illegally) present the work > as their own. > > For the record, the source of this information is not your gentle > correspondent, but http://www.astrojyoti.com/mantras4.htm > > Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 , "prainbow61" <paulie- rainbow@u...> wrote: >They're > attractive to folks who are not serious practictioners of the >faith > and don't want to trouble themselves with ethical questions etc. >This > little books are not generally favored by serious witches and >pagans. > > Is there a similarity here or am I mistaken? A few mantras listed there are correct but overall this site can be thought of as something like you mentioned. These will be of no value to a serious practitioner, IMO. Rgds > > prainbow > > , "Devi Bhakta" > <devi_bhakta> wrote: > > Dear Satish: > > > > Not to worry. None of this is particularly surprising (or > > particularly interesting) at this late date. We've seen this sort > of > > foolishness before; and we'll surely see it again in various forms. > > Whatever. My only comment concerns this line: > > > > *** she added "you may post them to and give me > > credit". *** > > > > Let me reiterate the group's rule that anyone posting information > > taken "cut 'n' paste" from another site should, at the very least, > > acknowledge the source -- and certainly should not, under any > > circumstance, untruthfully (and perhaps illegally) present the work > > as their own. > > > > For the record, the source of this information is not your gentle > > correspondent, but http://www.astrojyoti.com/mantras4.htm > > > > Aum Maatangyai Namahe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.