to Satish about sufis

[Guest guest]

93

 

U have no knowledge of those traditions so better in Ur position to

keep quiet. U make an offence of God's devotees by Ur words. Thou it

is a result of Ur ignorance, it doesn't make an excuse. Keep away from

that for Ur own benefit.

Saints of islam and christianity are not inferior to those from

tantrism and hinduism. In every true religion there's mysticism

present. U know nothing about non-hindu traditions, what right have U

got to judge them?

 

A.

 

, "Satish Arigela"

<satisharigela> wrote:

> , "Arjuna Taradasa"

> <bhagatirtha@m...> wrote:

> > 93

> > Sufi in it's proper sense are mystics of Islam only. If we start

> using

> > this term as designating ANY mystic, it becomes equal to words

> > "kaula", "gnostic", "tsaddik" etc used in same sense. Then we can

> say

> > that there're muslim kaulas :-).

>

>

> Except that they possess none of the qualities of a Kaula.

>

> sa.

[Guest guest]

, "Arjuna Taradasa"

<bhagatirtha@m...> wrote:

> 93

>

> U have no knowledge of those traditions so better in Ur position

to

> keep quiet. U make an offence of God's devotees by Ur words. Thou

it

> is a result of Ur ignorance, it doesn't make an excuse. Keep away

from

> that for Ur own benefit.

> Saints of islam and christianity are not inferior to those from

> tantrism and hinduism. In every true religion there's mysticism

> present. U know nothing about non-hindu traditions, what right

have U

> got to judge them?

 

 

I asked you specific questions regarding similarity. You had no

answer. What are trying to do with above statements? Trying to

instill fear? Be reminded that such silly tricks wont work on me.

The point is not whether Islamic and Christiam saints are inferior

or not. Why are you making such un-connected statements?

I did not say anything like that nor am I concerned if they are

inferior or superior.

 

I did not judge any religion. Show me a place where I did. Will you?

 

Stick to the topic under discussion next time.