Guest guest Posted May 14, 2004 Report Share Posted May 14, 2004 Dear Satish, You are right. I only raised a question AND NOT OBJECTION. I do understand that a sadhak might see it differently when he worships. I looked at it in this way. TEMPLE IS A PUBLIC PLACE AND A PLACE FOR MEDITATION why do we CONSCIOUSLY HAVE TO STIMULATE THE SENSES(DEVI LOOKS EXTREMELY ATTRACTIVE). I totally agree that even if we are covered still we can be erotic that does not stop us from covering in public places. THIS GOES TRUE IN ALL SOCIETY. I agree that time and again we do have SEXUAL FANTASIES and I am no exception. i ONCE AGAIN CLARIFY THAT I DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION - IT WAS ONLY MY OBSERVATION taking into account the existing society in which we live in. raji. >"Satish Arigela" <satisharigela > > > Re:clarification >Wed, 12 May 2004 05:59:12 -0000 > >, kalipadma@j... wrote: > > > > Rajii, do you think, over the centuries, that women have not had > >erotic > > fantasies about the male deities? > >Dark Krishna in his clinging yellow > > dhoti? Shiva dancing naked before the wives of the Rishis? > > >What does the above act of Shiva has to do with sexuality being a >path to devotion? > >Shiva appeared b4 them as a naked avadhuta and not as Shiva. The >wives of these rishis and the rishis themselves in darukavana did >not know that the naked avadhuta was Shiva. Shiva purana confirms >this. > > _______________ Hotmail en Messenger on the move http://www.msn.nl/communicatie/smsdiensten/hotmailsmsv2/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2004 Report Share Posted May 14, 2004 Calm down children *wink* I live in a place not far from where we see the most bautiful women unclad and unconcerned. Yet very little erotic thought comes to their mind. rajeshwari iyer <rajii31 wrote: Dear Satish, You are right. I only raised a question AND NOT OBJECTION. I do understand that a sadhak might see it differently when he worships. I looked at it in this way. TEMPLE IS A PUBLIC PLACE AND A PLACE FOR MEDITATION why do we CONSCIOUSLY HAVE TO STIMULATE THE SENSES(DEVI LOOKS EXTREMELY ATTRACTIVE). I totally agree that even if we are covered still we can be erotic that does not stop us from covering in public places. THIS GOES TRUE IN ALL SOCIETY. I agree that time and again we do have SEXUAL FANTASIES and I am no exception. i ONCE AGAIN CLARIFY THAT I DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION - IT WAS ONLY MY OBSERVATION taking into account the existing society in which we live in. raji. >"Satish Arigela" <satisharigela > > > Re:clarification >Wed, 12 May 2004 05:59:12 -0000 > >, kalipadma@j... wrote: > > > > Rajii, do you think, over the centuries, that women have not had > >erotic > > fantasies about the male deities? > >Dark Krishna in his clinging yellow > > dhoti? Shiva dancing naked before the wives of the Rishis? > > >What does the above act of Shiva has to do with sexuality being a >path to devotion? > >Shiva appeared b4 them as a naked avadhuta and not as Shiva. The >wives of these rishis and the rishis themselves in darukavana did >not know that the naked avadhuta was Shiva. Shiva purana confirms >this. > > _______________ Hotmail en Messenger on the move http://www.msn.nl/communicatie/smsdiensten/hotmailsmsv2/ / SBC - Internet access at a great low price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.