Guest guest Posted August 15, 2004 Report Share Posted August 15, 2004 Meat Eating Hindus According to Hinduism we have to be careful about our food, because what we eat decides our physical well being as well as our mental makeup. Eating very gross foods like animal meat and heavy or intoxicating food may lead to the strengthening of animal qualities and lethargic nature in us. This is one reason why Hindus do not prefer to eat non- vegetarian food. Another reason is their belief that killing innocent and helpless animals for the purpose of filling ones stomach is a bad karma with harmful consequences. Apart from non vegetarian food, orthodox Hindus also avoid eating spicy food, onions, garlic, mushrooms, intoxicating juices, very sour food and some bulbs and tubers. The following are a few quotations from the Manusmriti. The eater who daily even devours those destined to be his food, commits no sin; for the creator himself created both the eaters and those who are to be eaten (for those special purposes).(5:30) Meat can never be obtained without injury to living creatures, and injury to sentient beings is detrimental to (the attainment of) heavenly bliss; let him therefore shun (the use of) meat. (5:48) There is no sin in eating meat, in (drinking) spirituous liquor, and in carnal intercourse, for that is the natural way of created beings, but abstention brings great rewards. (5:56) Not all Hindus avoid eating meat. A great majority of Hindus eat it. In ancient India even the Brahmins were said to be eating certain types of sacrificial meat. Hindu laws books do not prohibit the eating of meat in general, but only certain types of meat. Jainism and Buddhism seemed to have influenced the food habits of Hindu community a great deal during the Gupta and post Gupta period, although we cannot say definitely that the concept of non violence and avoiding meat eating were alien to them. The ancient Hindu sacred literature mentions approvingly of the sacrifice of animals whose flesh was eaten presumably by those in charge of the temples where the sacrifice was given. Even now animals are slaughtered before certain idols of goddesses who are supposed to drink the blood of the slaughtered animals. What happens to the flesh of those animals left behind in the temples is anybody's guess. The sacrifice is supposed to be an offering to the gods and goddesses to please them. If gods and goddesses are pleased at the slaughter of animals whose blood, if also not their flesh, is acceptable to them as food, why should human beings hesitate to eat animal flesh? The Hindu gentlemen from Southern India (Madras) who have asked this question may not be aware but most of the Hindus in Central, Western and Northern India now eat animal flesh. Except for Jains and Buddhists, almost all other nations and religions approve of the eating of animal flesh. The reason for the overwhelming practice of eating flesh is that it is in the human nature to eat it. Proof of it is to be found in the canine teeth to be found in the human mouth, which teeth are only to be found in the carnivorous animals, and in the juices which flow in the human stomach [i.e., pepsin], the intestines and other organs of the digestive system. It is true that there are also in the human mouth the teeth to be found among the vegetarian animals. But that goes to show the fact God, the Great and Wise Creator, intended man to eat both the animal flesh and the vegetables. Proteins are the most important need of the human body. And animal proteins are the best and most easily assimilable proteins. The system within the human body for the assimilation of the proteins is very complicated and elaborate. Ask any impartial doctor and he will tell you that proteins from animal flesh are the most easily digested and assimilated proteins of all. Besides, there are important vitamins, minerals and enzymes to be found in animal flesh, which in fact help in the assimilation of proteins drawn from the same flesh. That food affects human character is now beginning to be realised by those doing medical research in the West -- particularly in America. Meat gives courage and stamina to human beings, as shown by history also that meat eating nations are the bravest. Even in this sub- continent the Rajputs, Gurkhas, and Marathas, who have been the best soldiers among the Hindus, are meat-eaters. The main objection to meat eating is that it means cruelty to animals when they are slaughtered. That objection may have looked worth considering before the scientific discoveries of the 20th century. It was no less a person than an outstanding Hindu scientist and a Nobel Prize winner, Sir J. C. Bose, who discovered that vegetables have, not only life, but sensibility particularly of pain. That finishes for all time the objection of cruelty to animals. If we slaughter a sheep or a bigger animal, it may suffer momentary pain when its throat is cut for it becomes insensitive to pain the moment its jugular vein is cut, and is unconscious of pain for the rest of its dying process. Such momentary pain is, in any case, better than months or years of slow dying through old age, debility and disease. But one such animal feeds several human beings for several meals, depending on its size. On the other hand, if one is a vegetarian, one slaughters, causing acute pain, to a large number of live vegetables to feed even one person at a time. Should we also ban the grazing of cattle because every blade of grass plucked by their teeth is a life eaten with acute pain to the poor grass? Talking about cruelty--is it cruelty to kill an animal instantaneously, but no cruelty to tie up a cow for life with a rope, deny its calf the milk the cow produces for it, and cause acute mental torture to the mother-cow and the hungry calf, while a so-called humanitarian being steals the milk before their eyes? Or is it humanitarian to enslave the bullocks in the plough or the bullock carts and work them day in and day out? BEEF-CONSUMPTION PROMOTED IN THE HINDU SCRIPTURES (UPANISHADS) The following ritual (which incidentally also includes sex and wife- battering) is excerpted from the Upanishads (the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad) and in the middle of the ritual, beef-consumption is encouraged in order to beget a learned and famous son: "Surely, a woman who has changed her clothes at the end of her menstrual period is the most auspicious of women. When she has changed her clothes at the end of her menstrual period, therefore, one should approach that splendid woman and invite her to have sex. Should she refuse to consent, he should bribe her. If she still refuses, he should beat her with a stick or with his fists and overpower her, saying: 'I take away the splendor from you with my virility and splendor.' And she is sure to become bereft of splendor. If, on the other hand, she accedes to his wish, he should say: 'I confer splendor on you with my virility and splendor.' And then they are both sure to become full of splendor. If he wants her to love him, he should slip his penis into her, press his mouth against hers, and stroke her vagina as he softly recites: 'From my body you spring -- from every inch! Born from my heart, you are my body's pith! Make her crazy about me, as if she's been hit with a dart carrying a poisoned tip.' If he does not want her to become pregnant, he should slip his penis into her, press his mouth against hers, blow into her mouth and suck back the breath, as he says: 'I take back the semen from you with my virility and semen.' And she is sure to become bereft of semen. If, on the other hand, he wants her to become pregnant, he should slip his penis into her, press his mouth against hers, suck in the breath first, and then blow it back into her mouth, as he says: 'I deposit the semen in you with my virility and semen.' And she is sure to become pregnant. In case someone's wife has a lover whom he hates, this is what he should do. He should place some fire in an unbaked pot, spread out a bed of reeds, arranging them in a way that is the reverse of the normal, apply ghee to the tips of those reeds, again in an order that is the reverse of the normal, and offer them in that fire, as he recites: 'In my fire you made an offering! So-and-so, I take away your out-breath and your in-breath. In my fire you made an offering! So-and-so, I take away your sons and livestock. In my fire you made an offering! So-and-so, I take away your sacrifices and good works. In my fire you made an offering! So-and-so, I take away your hopes and expectations.' A man cursed by a Brahmin possessing this knowledge is sure to depart from this world bereft of his virility and stripped of his good works. One should, therefore, never try to flirt with the wife of a learned Brahmin who knows this, lest one make an enemy of a man with this knowledge. Now, when a man finds that his wife is having her period, he should make sure that she does not drink from a metal cup or wear fresh clothes for three days. Nor should a low-caste man or woman be allowed to touch her. When the three days are over and she has taken her bath, he should get her to thresh some rice. 'I want a son with a fair complexion who will master a single Veda and live out his full life span' -- if this is his wish, he should get her to cook that rice with milk, and the two of them should eat it mixed with ghee. The couple thus becomes capable of begetting such a son. 'I want a son with a ruddy complexion and tawny eyes who will master two Vedas and live out his full life span' -- if this is his wish, he should get her to cook that rice with curd, and the two of them should eat it mixed with ghee. The couple thus becomes capable of begetting such a son. 'I want a son with a dark complexion and reddish eyes who will master three Vedas and live out his full life span' -- if this is his wish, he should get her to cook that rice in water and the two of them should eat it mixed with ghee. The couple thus becomes capable of begetting such a son. 'I want a learned daughter who will live out her full life span' -- if this is his wish, he should get her to cook that rice with sesame seeds and the two of them should eat it mixed with ghee. The couple thus becomes capable of begetting such a daughter. 'I want a learned and famous son, a captivating orator assisting at councils, who will master all the Vedas and live out his full life span' -- if this is his wish, he should get her to cook that rice with meat and the two of them should eat it mixed with ghee. The couple thus becomes capable of begetting such a son. The meat may be that of a young or a fully-grown bull. Then, towards morning, following the same ritual procedure as at the cooking of the pot of milk-rice, he should prepare melted butter and offer portions from the pot of milk-rice in the fire, saying: 'To fire, svaha! To assent, svaha! To the divine Savitr, faithful in procreation, svaha!' After making these offerings, he takes the rest out and, after first eating himself, gives some to his partner. After washing his hands, he fills a pot with water and sprinkles her with it three times, saying: 'Get up, Visvavasu, and leave this place; find yourself some other luscious girl. This wife is here with her husband.' Then he embraces her, as he says: 'I am ama, you are sa -- you are sa, I am ama. I am the Saman chant, you are the Rg verse; I am the sky, you are the earth. Come, let us unite, deposit the seed, to get a son, a male child.' Then he spreads apart her thighs, saying: 'Spread apart, earth and sky.' He slips his penis into her, presses his mouth against hers, and strokes her three times in the direction of her hair, as he says: 'May Vishnu prepare your womb, and Tvastr mould the forms; may Prajapati impregnate you, and Dhatr lay the foetus in you.' " -- Brhadaranyaka Upanishad 6:4:6- 21. [Olivelle, Patrick. Upanishads. Pub.: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-282292-6. pp.88-91]. Moreover, meat is further acclaimed by the Vedas as shown in the following quote from the Satapatha Brahmana: "Meat is indeed the best kind of food." -- Satapatha Brahmana 11:7:1:3; cf. 12:8:3:12. [Doniger, Wendy. The Laws of Manu. Pub.: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-044540-4. Introduction, page xxxiii]. III. NON-VEGETARIAN HINDU DEITIES Not only is meat-consumption praised in the Vedas, but some Hindu goddesses are not vegetarian either, as they eat flesh. For instance, it is recorded in the Puranas that Devi and other goddesses had devoured Shiva's testicles: "The demon Ruru with his army attacked the gods, who sought refuge with Devi. She laughed, and an army of goddesses emerged from her mouth. They killed Ruru and his army, but then they were hungry and asked for food. Devi summoned Rudra Pasupati and said, 'You have the form of a goat and you smell like a goat. These ladies will eat your flesh or else they will eat everything, even me.' Shiva said, 'When I pierced the fleeing sacrifice of Daksa, which had taken the form of a goat, I obtained the smell of a goat. But let the goddesses eat that which pregnant women have defiled with their touch, and newborn children, and women who cry all the time.' Devi refused this disgusting food, and finally Shiva said, 'I will give you something never tasted by anyone else: the two balls resembling fruits below my navel. Eat the testicles that hang there and be satisfied.' Delighted by this gift, the goddesses praised Shiva." -- Padma Purana 5:26:91-125; cf. Linga Purana 1:106:1-27; Matsya Purana 252:5- 19, 179:7-186; Kurma Purana 1:16:141-222. [O'Flaherty, Wendy D. Shiva: The Erotic Ascetic. Pub.: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19- 520250-3. p.280]. Meat-eating Rama In the Valmiki Ramayana, Rama laments to his mom (Kausalya) that he is going to be exiled from the palace at Ayodhya into the forest for fourteen years (because of his evil & selfish co-mom Kaikeyi's plot), and he explains how he will be missing eating meat as he is so accustomed to at the palace: "[Rama:] 'I must to lonely wilds repair, abstain from flesh, and living there on roots, fruit, honey, hermit's food, pass twice seven years (14 yrs.) in solitude. To Bharat's hand the king will yield the regent power I thought to wield, and me, a hermit, will he send my days in Dandak wood to spend.' " -- Ramayana 2:20. [Griffith, Ralph T.H. The Ramayan of Valmiki: translated into English verse. Benares: E.J. Lazarus & Co., 1895. p.117]. Lord Rama, a great, divine exemplar of dharma & virtue for Hindus, himself apparently doesn't care much for vegetarianism & ahimsa. Not only that, but some Brahmins & Ksatriyas ate five-clawed creatures. Five out of the five-clawed were allowed, that is. As the relatively innocent Vali is being murdered from ambush by Rama, he states: "[Vali:] 'Only five among the five-clawed creatures can be eaten by brahmans and kshatriyas, Raghava: the hedgehog, the porcupine, the lizard, the rabbit, and fifth, the turtle.' " -- Ramayana 4:17:34. [Lefeber, Rosalind. The Ramayana of Valmiki: an Epic of Ancient India. Kiskindhakanda (vol. 4). Pub.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-06661-2. p.90]. A very similar injunction is found in the Vaisnava dharmasastra: "If a man has (unawares) eaten meat of a five-toed animal, with the exception of the hare, the porcupine, the iguana, the rhinoceros, and the tortoise, he must fast for seven days." -- Visnusmrti 51:6. [Jolly, Julius. The Institutes of Vishnu. Sacred Books of the East (vol. 7). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1880. p.163]. Who knows, in addition to eating standard meats, perhaps both Rama & Sita also ate lizards, turtles, hedgehogs and porcupines. Budhdha ate meat -Please read 'Ragula Sangiruthiyayan's transalation of 6th Cenury BC novel - (the original stone-form of this book is available in the Poona Museum). Brahmins ate meat - after offering the same to the Lord. Please know about Asuvamedha Yagam - The Yagam meant for Horse Meat Offering to God and sharing the same with fellow Brahmins. Aryans ate meat. Of course all these people were not eating chicken and mutton those days. Chicken became a regular meat only after breeding them in Scientific method after 1950's. Lambs were rare. These people were eating animals which were available abundant - the beef. On special occasions they ate forest animals. Beef eating was stopped after Cow has become a form of God/Goddess - Around 5th Century of the Christian Era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 namaste, I would recommend to be a little extra careful when considering to quote wendy doniger and her books on Hinduism for she is quite know to have written many works which are not correct interpretations of scriptures. This is have has been quite a bit of debate in the academic circles and her introduction about Hindusism in Microsoft encarta has been replaced with a better one. While this hardly the list to debate this, please do a little more extensive search than quote wendy doniger. regards Rudra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.