Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 Jay Gurudev, I recently joined a orkut community 'Tantra', thinking there were discussion going on topic relevant to tantra. To my astonisment, found out 'tantra' here in west have become synonomous to "Tantrik sex". I thought what an irony. In my own backyard (Indian subcontinent) it has become synonomous to fear for the common folk due to selfish interest of some. I understand why this happened in east (still we can discuss it); please let me know how did tantra degenerated into tantrik sex to west. Regards Mithilesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 Hi Mithilesh! Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I understand your concerns, but my response would be that you're painting with rather too broad of a brush. You are correct that the term Tantra has been often misused in the West. The term Tantra, in its authentic sense, is not widely understood with any depth, subtlety or refinement. It is also used very loosely as a commercial "come-hither" to sell books, New Age recordings, sex manuals, etc. But to say Tantra "in the West has become synonomous to Tantrik sex" is an exaggeration. Nor do I think it is "synonomous to fear" in India. (See http://www.vi1.org to explore one great soul's efforts to aid "the common folk" precisely through the agency of Tantra.) I am certainly often to discussion if you'd like to get more specific. And I'm sure many members more knowledgeable than myself will be able to address your concerns better than I am able. Still, I would like to quote at some length this excerpt, posted a few weeks back by our valued member jaimaa1008, which might put a slightly different spin on your thinking about Tantra: "There are too many things going on at the same time. There is the wonderful body of tantric texts; there is the not-so-open pool of tantric masters and practioners; and there is California neo-tantra. "Despite the fact that lot of Indians practice some form of Tantra, the majority view is an apologetic one where all the 'nasty' parts are pushed under the mat. Most of the people -- especially those of the upper castes --- see it a a means to realize the wonderful adwaithic goal of the Shankara tradition; and anything which conflicts with that is useless, immoral and evil or is for persons of lesser mental intellectual and moral calibre. "And then there is the secrecy and the caste politics. It's kind of sad that so many of the texts, practices and traditions are lost because of this. (This is in complete contrast to the Buddhist tantras. Of course the tibetans don't start by drawing attention to their tantric practices involving the same panchamakaras, they just talk about world peace.) It's also unfortunate that practicing tantrics, instead of being open to all the paths, are denying a lot as being against the vedic, hence 'bad'. "And there is the western concern with tantric sex which is just a small part. "Whatever form it takes this is good for tantra and its survival. The scholars are producing great books, people are having better sex and the sadhakas are having better access to texts and teachers. Tantra has arrived lets make the best use of it,and choose any path without being apologetic about it." Wow. I can't put it any better than that. DB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2004 Report Share Posted September 24, 2004 Hello DB, Jay Gurudev; Thank you for your response. It was really thoughtful. > But to say Tantra "in the West has become synonomous to Tantrik sex" > is an exaggeration. Nor do I think it is "synonomous to fear" in > India. (See http://www.vi1.org to explore one great soul's efforts to > aid "the common folk" precisely through the agency of Tantra.) I am not sure about the comment I made about west prespective. May be I should not have made that comment. I am eager to know from the knowledgble members of the group about this prespective. About the 'fear' atleast in Indian subcontinent, I beg to differ. The meaning of 'tantra', as I have understood is system (please correct me if i am wrong). It find many usage, as in 'prajatantra', 'rajtantra', mantra-tantra (and many more words) meaning democracy, monarchy, procedure to perform pujas by reciting mantra respectively. When we just say 'tantra', it is usually interpreted as 'mantra-tantra-yantra'. And there is nothing to fear with this science. The fear I think come from ignorance. Couple of years back, when I use to bow before goddes kali (my family diety), it was more because of fear than reverance. Reason I guess was my ignorance; am still working on it. May be we will have to do some survery to prove our respective points. I agree with you that there are lot of efforts both individual and as group to dispel the myth and fear. One of the prominent being my revered gurudev. > I am certainly often to discussion if you'd like to get more specific. > And I'm sure many members more knowledgeable than myself will be able > to address your concerns better than I am able. Thank You so much. So nice of you. Now let me rephrase my query. Is there any sadhana in mantra-tantra where sexuality is involved and is this the reason why we hear about 'tantric sex'. i have heard of 'kamasutra' but never heard 'kamatantra'. Thank You. Regards Mithilesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2004 Report Share Posted September 27, 2004 Hi Mithilesh: Thanks for your response. *** About the 'fear', at least in Indian subcontinent, I beg to differ. The meaning of 'tantra', as I have understood is system (please correct me if i am wrong). It find many usage ... When we just say 'tantra', it is usually interpreted as 'mantra-tantra-yantra'. And there is nothing to fear with this science. The fear I think come from ignorance. *** That is my point, precisely. *** I agree with you that there are lot of efforts both individual and as group to dispel the myth and fear. One of the prominent being my revered gurudev. *** It is a primary purpose here as well, to the extent that Devi might wish our efforts to have some effect. *** Is there any sadhana in mantra-tantra where sexuality is involved? *** Yes. *** is this the reason why we hear about 'tantric sex'? *** Don't know. Maybe. *** i have heard 'kamasutra' but never heard 'kamatantra'. *** *lol* Nor have I ... Thanks again ... DB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.