Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 93 The problem is not the difference of opinion. Everyone has the right to think and express what they think. The problem is that "Omprem" said he expresses the view of particular tradition (that too saying he`s a teacher of it!) - while what he said is totally off. If i say some nonsense, it is just my ignorant viewpoint. But if i say that this nonsense is the doctrine of Yoga, the case is different, isn`t it? > Why are you so cricital? > Why must everyone attack Omprem? > This answer makes sense to me from an intuitive level, it sounds good to > me. > Omprem didn't say this is the one and only "truth" -- he's only > answering my question, and rather graciously, at that. > I appreciate this answer, and can't see why you should attack it. If you > have a different explanation of Kundalini and Prana, please offer it for > consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 And yet you fail utterly to provide any evidence whatsoever that what I say is 'off'. For someone who claims to value scientific method, you are quick to dispense with it when making assertions that you cannot prove about things that you do not understand. But you do provide plenty of evidence that your own views do not even stand up to the most elementary logical analysis. You show not the slightest ability to understand what the saints and seers have to say about koshas, prana, and Kundaliini. Omprem , "Arjuna Taradasa" <bhagatirtha@m...> wrote: > > 93 > > The problem is not the difference of opinion. Everyone has the right > to think and express what they think. > > The problem is that "Omprem" said he expresses the view of particular > tradition (that too saying he`s a teacher of it!) - while what he said > is totally off. > > If i say some nonsense, it is just my ignorant viewpoint. But if i say > that this nonsense is the doctrine of Yoga, the case is different, > isn`t it? > > > > Why are you so cricital? > > Why must everyone attack Omprem? > > This answer makes sense to me from an intuitive level, it sounds > good to > > me. > > Omprem didn't say this is the one and only "truth" -- he's > only > > answering my question, and rather graciously, at that. > > I appreciate this answer, and can't see why you should attack it. > If you > > have a different explanation of Kundalini and Prana, please offer it > for > > consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.