Guest guest Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 93 [A small correction - of course, "svechchhA niyama".] Writings of AC can be understood on different levels. To understand fully writings of class A we need to be siddhas ourselves . Even Crowley himself didn`t realize totally the message of Liber AL... His life was the life of Vira. Nobody says Crowley was perfect in all ways and all what he said is ultimate truth. But it may be useful to concider his experience and knowledge. Thelemic doctrine is much similar to that of Kaula-mata. This fact is the reason of my interest towards it`s sourses. Concerning what U `ve asked about Law, i shall no comment. As U may know from commentary of AC to Liber AL, it is prohibited to discuss these matters. "Those who discuss the contents of this Book are to be shunned by all, as centres of pestilence. All questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my writings, each for himself. There is no law beyond Do what thou wilt." Love, A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.