Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Well, I personally was referring to Hermetic Qabalah; not being Jewish,I find Jewish Torah-based "Kabbalah" tedious, patriarchal, and irrelevant to me as well. The methodology of the Mystical Qabalah, however as taught by the great female adept, Dion Fortune, is an endlessly fascinating delight, the Yoga of the West! It is no surprise you didn't "get" Crowley; without knowledge of Qabalah, as I said, his knowledge is a closed door to you. As is the inner knowledge of all Western esotericism, the basis of which is the Tree of Life. Lilith M. --- Lars Hedström <lars wrote: > > Mouse wrote: > > > . BTW it is PROHIBITED for a person > > to study mysteries of Kabbalah if he is not > married. > > > > Yaawn, who cares about how jews define patriarchalic > marriages.. > > Nothing could be more irrelevant to me. > > In the pre-historic goddes-culture nothing as > "marriage" in the sense > we understand it existed. > > Regards > > Lars > > > > > > _______________________________ Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2004 Report Share Posted October 23, 2004 93 , Lili Masamura <sephirah5> wrote: > Well, I personally was referring to Hermetic Qabalah; > not being Jewish,I find Jewish Torah-based "Kabbalah" > tedious, patriarchal, and irrelevant to me as well. > The methodology of the Mystical Qabalah, however as > taught by the great female adept, Dion Fortune, is an > endlessly fascinating delight, the Yoga of the West! > It is no surprise you didn't "get" Crowley; without > knowledge of Qabalah, as I said, his knowledge is a > closed door to you. As is the inner knowledge of all > Western esotericism, the basis of which is the Tree of > Life. > Lilith M. Dion Fortune was an adept of G.`.D.`. order. Their Kabbalah was based on jewish sourses as well. Known to U Tree of Life is described in jewish kabbalistic writings of at least 13-16 centuries or even earier. When did Golden Dawn appear? Then, jewish Kabbalah (which is THE ONLY sourse of Kabbalah) is based on Torah, Sepher ha-Zohar and other traditional texts as well as on oral transmission said to be going on from Abraham and Moshe. Without knowledge of Kabbalah U won`t understand not only Crowley but even christiantity . God bless! A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2004 Report Share Posted October 23, 2004 Arjuna Taradasa wrote: > > > > Dion Fortune was an adept of G.`.D.`. order. When you read the history about Golden Dawn, all the ridiculous quarrels and fights and ego-wars and struggle of power there was between the members in this association, do you really think this is a sign of developed human beings? Human beings that we should have as spiritual examples? Regards Lars .. .. h Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2004 Report Share Posted October 23, 2004 Personally I haven't heard of any who study Crowley who doesn't know Dione Fortune. Anyhow, I came to this group not to discuss Crowley and Qabala, you have your opinion and I have mine and thats' that. My last post about this matter. Regrads Lars Lili Masamura wrote: >Well, I personally was referring to Hermetic Qabalah; >not being Jewish,I find Jewish Torah-based "Kabbalah" >tedious, patriarchal, and irrelevant to me as well. >The methodology of the Mystical Qabalah, however as >taught by the great female adept, Dion Fortune, is an >endlessly fascinating delight, the Yoga of the West! >It is no surprise you didn't "get" Crowley; without >knowledge of Qabalah, as I said, his knowledge is a >closed door to you. As is the inner knowledge of all >Western esotericism, the basis of which is the Tree of >Life. > Lilith M. >--- Lars Hedström <lars wrote: > > > >>Mouse wrote: >> >> >> >>>. BTW it is PROHIBITED for a person >>>to study mysteries of Kabbalah if he is not >>> >>> >>married. >> >> >>Yaawn, who cares about how jews define patriarchalic >>marriages.. >> >>Nothing could be more irrelevant to me. >> >>In the pre-historic goddes-culture nothing as >>"marriage" in the sense >>we understand it existed. >> >>Regards >> >>Lars >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >_______________________________ > >Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! >http://vote. > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.