Vishesharghya a Clarification (To Jaima1008)

[Guest guest]

Hi jaima

 

you wrote:

 

<<I remember when I posted a question about the presence of sexual

fluids in Vishesharghya and Kochu and Sunelectric reacted strongly to

it and now Kochu defends the alchohol in visheshargya and quoting

texts.(the same texts also mention the other ingredient.>>

 

Let me go on the record about something. I *am* a kaula I am well

aware of what you state above. I am not a man of delicate spiritual

sensibilites that faints at the idea of these sorts of practices. Far

from it. The only reason that I was deflecting your post away from

this topic is b/c

 

1) as you can see from the posts here regarding qualifications for

Sri Vidya Upasana these things tend to enflame this board in all

sorts of (useless) arguments around what is "pure" and "impure" as

pertains to puja/sadhana. I bore of those discussions quickly.

 

2) I thought that you were someone who didn't know much about SV &

Tantra and you had latched on to the whole sex thing without

understanding or context of broader tradition.

 

Clearly I misjudged you. I apologize for that. I would love for you

to post the traditional dhyanams from Sastra as we go through the KS

Devis here if you are so inclined. ; )

 

~SE101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, "jaimaa1008" <jaimaa1008>

wrote:

>

> Devi Bhakta,

>

> You wrote:

> >

> But you are not Guruji. As you stated yourself above, you are

> a "beginner." So why are you wasting your time trying to argue down

> experience? You would do better to listen to what Guruji is saying,

> rather than judging and/or dismissing his experience and teaching

> based on some books you've read. Or choose your books, but

understand

> that they are an additional valid vision, not the *only* valid

vision.

> >

> I am not judging or dismissing his experience and teaching, nor

> am i saying that there is just one valid vision.I started by saying

> that the pics. were not aesthetic, and I meant thir execution was

not

> of great merit as art, and then when Kochu said what aesthetic can

a

> photo have( it does and thats why photography is an art form)i

added

> that the descriptions in the texts are different.

> Since the Khadgamala is a well known *ancient* text I thought

the

> descriptions should be textual. Going by your own argument you can

> choose to visualize as per those pictures but every one need not.I

> was just stating the fact that they were different.

> Every body has a right to their opinion. I remember when I

> posted a question about the presence of sexual fluids in

> Vishesharghya

> and Kochu and Sunelectric reacted strongly to it and now Kochu

> defends the alchohol in visheshargya and quoting texts.(the same

> texts also mention the other ingredient.)

> If this forum is used to enforce the opinions of a few people

you

> should say so and not make it seem like its a fair discussion of

> Shakti sadhana. No one has a clue to the one right path, we can

only

> make one our own.I would rather have my truth however flawed it is

> than someone else's forced on me, however great the other is -

thats

> religion for me.

> Thank you for taking the trouble to reply.