Guest guest Posted October 30, 2004 Report Share Posted October 30, 2004 93 Seems i have missed one masterpiece of "hindu thought" ))))))). Poor Lili had to answer now to such comments. -- kumar krishna <kichu_60002> wrote: > dear friend.. > I think you got a long way to go..... > please dont insult kaali maa like this... Where have U seen any insult in Lili`s post? I`ve read it and i see none. Viparita maithuna of Kalika and Shiva is described in many tantric shastras and depicted in many medieval miniatures. There relationships are always said to be sexual... Kalivilasa-tantra says that Krishna is son of Kali; even this example is only mythological but it stands for the fact of nature of relationships of Kali with Shiva. > you please understand her...her birth...(hey you > have to go deep into hindu mithology) I went deeper than U have . And i can approve Lili`s interpretation is valid. Not the only one possible but it is proper. > and who was she????? > who is shakti... > who is a vishnava... > and who is a shiva... > and who is a real hindu...????????????????????? A good question. There is no "hinduism" as such. There a hundreds of diversed schools and traditions that may have sometimes nothing in common. Who is "vaishnava and shaiva" (guess u wanted to say this) - worshippers of Vishnu and Shiva and followers of corresponding traditions. What is the problem with these and what is the relation of these to the topic discussed??? A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.