Guest guest Posted November 2, 2004 Report Share Posted November 2, 2004 93 Eventhough, when Abhinavagutpa comes to hierarchy of methods, he puts kula-prakriya ABOVE tantra-prakriya. What he means by kula-prakriya is described in 29th ahnika of his Tantraloka (and there is vama-ritual depicted); while under definition of tantra-prakriya fall all other three systems of KSh in whole - Pratyabhijna, Krama and Trika (that of course have also have shivopaya incorporated into their body of doctrine). Pratyabhijna is by definition pure shivopaya, but still Abhinava sees it as being inferior to Kula . Then, as i already told, union with woman in Kula-mata is not only upaya! But it is natural expression of inner Samarasya realised. If it was simply "one of many anavopayas", Tantras wouldn`t overestimate this practice and put it at the heart of the Path in whole. Kaula sees the perfect union as being BOTH inside and outside, and not only inside as most other traditions. Kaula teaching just adds that inner realisation is necessarily correlated with outer. Thus, it is the union of man and woman that is the most perfect embodiment of Shiva-Shakti-Yamala. As Jnanarnava-tantra says: shivashaktisamAyogo yoga eva na saMshayaH.. (From the context it is obvious that by shiva-shakti in this verse man and woman are meant ). U may disagree of course - lastly U are not a follower of Kula-path. There is no problem with this. What i say is reflecting law of Kula, Kula-dharma. But this is not forced unto followers of any other ways. Love is the law, love under will. A. , "Sarabhanga Giri" <sarabhanga> wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.