Dissecting "shakti"- to Sharabhanga

[Guest guest]

93

 

, "Sarabhanga Giri"

Sri Pancakshara exists eternally in pure bija form, and that is how

> the Rishis originally conceived it, and why it even appears in the

> Yajur Veda.

 

As we both understand, this is the matter of belief. Note, i don't

tell this is wrong .

> And, once again, just because you have never seen

> mantras "exposed", "dissected", or "revealed" as a set of bijas,

it can not be assumed that such expositions are lacking.

 

If U take burden to see the thread from the beginning U can notice

that i never said THIS .

Besides, i guess we both expressed what we intended to. I appreciate

Ur views and enjoy reading Ur posts . However in SOME points i

have my own opinion - and being also initiated into hindu mystical

tradition (although not the same as U) i have grounds for it .

> These are understandings that naturally reveal themselves in

sadhana.

 

This is exactly true. And for this reason i concider Ur opinion in

shaiva-vidya more valid than mine. And i expect that U may concider

my views when it is related to kaula-mata.

> are not regularly using Pancackshara (which also implies that your

> Guru has also been using the same mantra, and so too his own Guru,

> etc., etc.), then it is unlikely that such essential

interpretations would easily occur to you.

 

I do not use panchakshara - see above. Although one of my gurus was

also a shaiva, he transmitted to me different vidya.

 

Likewise for Hare Rama, which is simply

> revealed as haM raM raM; and raM alone is well known as one of the

> most powerful bijas. The conception of "haM raM" lies in

Devanagari (City of the Gods) itself, long before the epics were

composed in more earthly realms.

 

This is interesting. What is the base of this in Scriptures? Or it's

oral teaching of Ur lineage?

> Don't concern yourself with the entire corpus of available mantra

> until you are well grounded in the mantra received from your own

> Guru. Have determined patience and all will be revealed.

 

). Same thing can be said to everyone including U - and this

cannot be argued LOL.

Well, perhaps only God and guru can judge how much we are grounded

in our vidya - no point to discuss this here.

 

Best regards,

A.

[Guest guest]

"Sri Pancakshara exists eternally in pure bija form"

Dear Arjuna, I KNOW this to be true, just as it is a general Hindu

understanding that the entire vedic corpus is derived from a single

bija (the Pranava). This is fundamental to Mantra Shastra.

 

You did write that you had "never seen it [i.e. Hare Rama] exposed as

a set of Bijas", and I was referring to this particular stated

ignorance of Hare Rama and its underlying revelations.

 

And you ask "What is the base of this in Scriptures?".

Bijas ARE the very basis of Scripture itself!

 

I do not desire argument, only understanding; but your "this can not

be argued" comment requires clarification.

I do not mean to insult you, but since your understanding of mantra

and bijas seems rather shallow, I had assumed that you might benefit

from more concerted japa of just ONE mantra.

Similarly, I do not mean to praise myself, but since I generally find

it a simple task to penetrate this esoteric vibrational world, I

consider that my Guru's guidance and my own practice have actually

prepared me to grasp the inner truths of diverse Vidyas. These other

truths are peripheral to my own practice, and my only intention for

making any comment in this or any other forum is to offer assistance

to those who ask for it, or to correct misunderstanding when I see it

and am able to help. As an Avadhuta of the Sri Panca Dasanama Juna

Akhada it is my Duty to fight tirelessly for Truth. Not MY personal

ideas, but TRUTH itself, in big bold capitals.

 

Patience, Determination, AND Humility, are required for success.