Sacred "Hidden" Secret of the Millineum, Millennium?

[Guest guest]

"God Is A Woman", by I. Scott Chase.

Greyden Press Publishers

 

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1570744092/

ref%3Dpd%5Fcp%5Fec%5Fbk%5Fa/104-6252050-1283147

 

"Egyptians said the primeval sea womb was the Goddess Nun,

[or Nwt] who gave birth to the Sun and all the gods. [in China She

was named NuWa.] In Sumeria, She was Nammu, who created the

sky and the earth. [For the Dogon, She was Nommu.] In Babylon,

She was Tiamat, the Deep, who gave birth to all the deities. In

Greece She was the primal Goddess Gaea, who gave birth

to the sky, Uranus. Assyria told of the wise Goddess Mami, who

made human beings out of the clay that was part of her womb."

 

"In 2100 BC, the ziggurat which dominated Ur (Iraq) was built

to honor the Goddess Nanna, Innana."

 

"The oldest statuary found, dating from as early as 250,000 BC,

is invariably female."

 

"Yahweh was first depicted [as a woman] with Ram's horns, but

later these horns were assigned to the devil." [Y, of Yahweh, for Yoni.]

 

"In Arabia [she was signified by the V or vulva] ... the three Lunar

Goddesses, under the names of Al-Uzza, Manat, and Al-Lat [Allah.]"

 

Al-Lah meaning She was gives milk, the creator, the nurturer.

 

ALL (ALL-LAH) Divine ...

 

Millennium

[Guest guest]

Primitive peoples seek to explain their world using human

relationship and human behavioural models. This is neither

new nor unexpected. However this tendency to present a

philosophy anthrocentrically because of an unsophisticated

ability to analyze, grasp and present ideas does not mean that

the theory has any truth in it.

 

Nor does it matter that several groups use a similar

anthropocentric model lend any weight to the theory. Given the

primitve level of these peoples it would be more remarkable if

they do not use an anthropocentric model.

 

It is useless to argue about whether God is a woman or a man.

God is neither. The Vedantic term, Brahman, is more useful

because not only does it not assume gender but it goes well

beyond that by asserting no qualities whatsoever.

 

Omprem

 

 

 

, "Millennium Twain"

<yonibluestar> wrote:

>

> "God Is A Woman", by I. Scott Chase.

> Greyden Press Publishers

>

> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1570744092/

> ref%3Dpd%5Fcp%5Fec%5Fbk%5Fa/104-6252050-1283147

>

> "Egyptians said the primeval sea womb was the Goddess

Nun,

> [or Nwt] who gave birth to the Sun and all the gods. [in China

She

> was named NuWa.] In Sumeria, She was Nammu, who

created the

> sky and the earth. [For the Dogon, She was Nommu.] In

Babylon,

> She was Tiamat, the Deep, who gave birth to all the deities. In

> Greece She was the primal Goddess Gaea, who gave birth

> to the sky, Uranus. Assyria told of the wise Goddess Mami,

who

> made human beings out of the clay that was part of her womb."

>

> "In 2100 BC, the ziggurat which dominated Ur (Iraq) was built

> to honor the Goddess Nanna, Innana."

>

> "The oldest statuary found, dating from as early as 250,000

BC,

> is invariably female."

>

> "Yahweh was first depicted [as a woman] with Ram's horns,

but

> later these horns were assigned to the devil." [Y, of Yahweh, for

Yoni.]

>

> "In Arabia [she was signified by the V or vulva] ... the three

Lunar

> Goddesses, under the names of Al-Uzza, Manat, and Al-Lat

[Allah.]"

>

> Al-Lah meaning She was gives milk, the creator, the nurturer.

>

> ALL (ALL-LAH) Divine ...

>

> Millennium

[Guest guest]

Aye!

 

SHE is the ONE of ALL qualities ...

 

Millennium

 

...

 

--- omprem <omprem wrote:

>

> It is useless to argue about whether God is a woman or a man.

> God is neither. The Vedantic term, Brahman, is more useful

> because not only does it not assume gender but it goes well

> beyond that by asserting no qualities whatsoever.

>

> Omprem

[Guest guest]

It is your choice to remain locked in a relative, dualistic world that

is but a creation of Maya. Good luck.

 

Omprem

 

 

, MessiahTwain

<yonibluestar> wrote:

>

> Aye!

>

> SHE is the ONE of ALL qualities ...

>

> Millennium

>

> ..

>

> --- omprem <omprem> wrote:

> >

> > It is useless to argue about whether God is a woman or a

man.

> > God is neither. The Vedantic term, Brahman, is more useful

> > because not only does it not assume gender but it goes well

> > beyond that by asserting no qualities whatsoever.

> >

> > Omprem