Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 I do not believe now nor will i Ever believe that those who participated in the Crusades are exempt from karma. I don't care Who they were fighting for it was Wrong and, I don't know what their individual karmas will be about it, and i don't believe karma is as simple as "punishment" and i don't tend to think like that except when i'm morbidly depressed. You of all people Lilith, should understand the neeed for a Mother/Father Goddess/God to be serious with His/Her children and teach them to be good by finding ways to help them understand it is wrong to murder people in the name of God. Peace, Cathie In a message dated 1/17/2005 7:32:05 PM Mountain Standard Time, paulie-rainbow writes: > For instance: when the > >Crusaders were fighting for God, they were exempted > >from their karma, but the moment one of them succumbed > >to greed, and took that piece of jewelry or that money > >pouch from his victims'corpses, and put it in his > >pocket, it was no longer a "Holy" war from then on, > >but a war for personal gain! > > Lilith M. > >################################################# > > > Were they still exempt from karma when they succumbed cannibalism? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 In a message dated 1/18/2005 9:11:22 AM Mountain Standard Time, detective_mongo_phd writes: > Only the Absolute is free of karma. There are also meditation karmas. What's "meditation karmas"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 In a message dated 1/18/2005 8:56:56 AM Mountain Standard Time, ammasmon writes: > True. This only means that the they were under the Gods' protection, > if they expressed devotion to God. I do not believe God told them to go have an Inquisition, and therefor they were not doing it "for God" but for their own misguided reasons. Maybe Diving Providence will give each person what he/she needs to help them understand that this is so -- so they will see that God did not want an Inquisition it was not God's Inquisition. Hitlar thought he was doing good too. I do not believe there is no justice/karma for the insane either. One way or another Everybody has to know it is not ok for a mother to drown her own children. Blessings of the Goddess, Cathie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 In a message dated 1/18/2005 8:56:56 AM Mountain Standard Time, ammasmon writes: > God is teaching them, patiently and slowly, without a doubt, using > the tools of Unconditional Love and Witnessing, and who knows how > many other tools. Anyway (from God's perspective of timelessness), > why the hurry in teaching? We (limited in time and space) minds > would like see everyone "taught" within our lifetimes of 50-100 > years, but God's lifetime is billions of years, really speaking > infinite time. This I agree with. Yet God is not always patient and kind. God can be ruthless. Even Jesus, who everybody likes to make into a sugary piece of cake, says things like "nation will rise against nation" and "i come not to bring peace but a sword." You truly believe the crimes of the inquisition will not warrent any karma, you have got something all wrong. I do not believe it. That being said, I do not think of karma as punishment but as lessons. Some lessons are not so easy. There is a lot of pain and suffereing in the world. Things are not so simple as "stupidity insanity or arrogance masquerading as faith in God and devotion to God, get's one off the hook for karma... I will never believe it. Peace, Cathie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 In a message dated 1/18/2005 11:20:21 AM Mountain Standard Time, kochu1tz writes: > a true blood shakta IS excempted from Karma as long as he does bhoo shuddhi > and bhootashuddhi. What's shuddhi and bhootashuddhi? and having asked that, I would also remark, I seriuosly doubt the inquisitors were "true shaktas" -- isn't a shakta a hindu shaman who is devoted to Shakti??? blessings of the Goddeess, cathie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 Hi Cathie, What Lilith said is true, as per what I understand. Before you baulk in shock and anguish, try and understand the "game" that life is, for lack of a better word. . Lilith said "were fighting for God, ... exempt from karma ....". True. This only means that the they were under the Gods' protection, if they expressed devotion to God. This is God's unconditionality towards his devotees, forget about the "injustice" for the time being. She also said that the moment it became a "personal gain" they felt the karma. That is also true ... when God ceased to be the reason for the war, and the reason became selfish gain, then automatic and immediate and impersonal cause-effect took over (because it ceased to be God's work). There is no selfishness on God's part, instead look at it as God's magnanimity for allowing a person to have a "free will" and thereby the consequences too. As regards your point about "teaching them", here is where I make the distinction between "karma" and "prarabhdha". "Lack of Karma" or "Karma not affecting you" does not necessarily mean your time here is done. Your time here is done only if you have learned all your lessons. .... For that reason, such folks (who think they are doing God's work, even if you think that work is obnoxious) are protected but still learning and hence still alive (and will take more births). God is teaching them, patiently and slowly, without a doubt, using the tools of Unconditional Love and Witnessing, and who knows how many other tools. Anyway (from God's perspective of timelessness), why the hurry in teaching? We (limited in time and space) minds would like see everyone "taught" within our lifetimes of 50-100 years, but God's lifetime is billions of years, really speaking infinite time. There is time till the maha-pralaya (great dissolution) of the universe to teach, and also the next maha-yuga and so on, so rest assured about the edification of "us people". Jai Ma! , SophiasHeaven@a... wrote: > > I do not believe now nor will i Ever believe that those who participated in > the Crusades are exempt from karma. I don't care Who they were fighting for > it was Wrong and, I don't know what their individual karmas will be about it, > and i don't believe karma is as simple as "punishment" and i don't tend to > think like that except when i'm morbidly depressed. > You of all people Lilith, should understand the neeed for a Mother/Father > Goddess/God to be serious with His/Her children and teach them to be good by > finding ways to help them understand it is wrong to murder people in the name of > God. > > Peace, > Cathie > In a message dated 1/17/2005 7:32:05 PM Mountain Standard Time, > paulie-rainbow@u... writes: > > > For instance: when the > > >Crusaders were fighting for God, they were exempted > > >from their karma, but the moment one of them succumbed > > >to greed, and took that piece of jewelry or that money > > >pouch from his victims'corpses, and put it in his > > >pocket, it was no longer a "Holy" war from then on, > > >but a war for personal gain! > > > Lilith M. > > >################################################# Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 Only the Absolute is free of karma. There are also meditation karmas. - manoj_menon Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:54 AM Re: Karma Hi Cathie, What Lilith said is true, as per what I understand. Before you baulk in shock and anguish, try and understand the "game" that life is, for lack of a better word. . Lilith said "were fighting for God, ... exempt from karma ....". True. This only means that the they were under the Gods' protection, if they expressed devotion to God. This is God's unconditionality towards his devotees, forget about the "injustice" for the time being. She also said that the moment it became a "personal gain" they felt the karma. That is also true ... when God ceased to be the reason for the war, and the reason became selfish gain, then automatic and immediate and impersonal cause-effect took over (because it ceased to be God's work). There is no selfishness on God's part, instead look at it as God's magnanimity for allowing a person to have a "free will" and thereby the consequences too. As regards your point about "teaching them", here is where I make the distinction between "karma" and "prarabhdha". "Lack of Karma" or "Karma not affecting you" does not necessarily mean your time here is done. Your time here is done only if you have learned all your lessons. .... For that reason, such folks (who think they are doing God's work, even if you think that work is obnoxious) are protected but still learning and hence still alive (and will take more births). God is teaching them, patiently and slowly, without a doubt, using the tools of Unconditional Love and Witnessing, and who knows how many other tools. Anyway (from God's perspective of timelessness), why the hurry in teaching? We (limited in time and space) minds would like see everyone "taught" within our lifetimes of 50-100 years, but God's lifetime is billions of years, really speaking infinite time. There is time till the maha-pralaya (great dissolution) of the universe to teach, and also the next maha-yuga and so on, so rest assured about the edification of "us people". Jai Ma! , SophiasHeaven@a... wrote: > > I do not believe now nor will i Ever believe that those who participated in > the Crusades are exempt from karma. I don't care Who they were fighting for > it was Wrong and, I don't know what their individual karmas will be about it, > and i don't believe karma is as simple as "punishment" and i don't tend to > think like that except when i'm morbidly depressed. > You of all people Lilith, should understand the neeed for a Mother/Father > Goddess/God to be serious with His/Her children and teach them to be good by > finding ways to help them understand it is wrong to murder people in the name of > God. > > Peace, > Cathie > In a message dated 1/17/2005 7:32:05 PM Mountain Standard Time, > paulie-rainbow@u... writes: > > > For instance: when the > > >Crusaders were fighting for God, they were exempted > > >from their karma, but the moment one of them succumbed > > >to greed, and took that piece of jewelry or that money > > >pouch from his victims'corpses, and put it in his > > >pocket, it was no longer a "Holy" war from then on, > > >but a war for personal gain! > > > Lilith M. > > >################################################# Links / b.. c.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 a true blood shakta IS excempted from Karma as long as he does bhoo shuddhi and bhootashuddhi. Detective_Mongo_Phd <detective_mongo_phd wrote:Only the Absolute is free of karma. There are also meditation karmas. - manoj_menon Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:54 AM Re: Karma Hi Cathie, What Lilith said is true, as per what I understand. Before you baulk in shock and anguish, try and understand the "game" that life is, for lack of a better word. . Lilith said "were fighting for God, ... exempt from karma ....". True. This only means that the they were under the Gods' protection, if they expressed devotion to God. This is God's unconditionality towards his devotees, forget about the "injustice" for the time being. She also said that the moment it became a "personal gain" they felt the karma. That is also true ... when God ceased to be the reason for the war, and the reason became selfish gain, then automatic and immediate and impersonal cause-effect took over (because it ceased to be God's work). There is no selfishness on God's part, instead look at it as God's magnanimity for allowing a person to have a "free will" and thereby the consequences too. As regards your point about "teaching them", here is where I make the distinction between "karma" and "prarabhdha". "Lack of Karma" or "Karma not affecting you" does not necessarily mean your time here is done. Your time here is done only if you have learned all your lessons. .... For that reason, such folks (who think they are doing God's work, even if you think that work is obnoxious) are protected but still learning and hence still alive (and will take more births). God is teaching them, patiently and slowly, without a doubt, using the tools of Unconditional Love and Witnessing, and who knows how many other tools. Anyway (from God's perspective of timelessness), why the hurry in teaching? We (limited in time and space) minds would like see everyone "taught" within our lifetimes of 50-100 years, but God's lifetime is billions of years, really speaking infinite time. There is time till the maha-pralaya (great dissolution) of the universe to teach, and also the next maha-yuga and so on, so rest assured about the edification of "us people". Jai Ma! , SophiasHeaven@a... wrote: > > I do not believe now nor will i Ever believe that those who participated in > the Crusades are exempt from karma. I don't care Who they were fighting for > it was Wrong and, I don't know what their individual karmas will be about it, > and i don't believe karma is as simple as "punishment" and i don't tend to > think like that except when i'm morbidly depressed. > You of all people Lilith, should understand the neeed for a Mother/Father > Goddess/God to be serious with His/Her children and teach them to be good by > finding ways to help them understand it is wrong to murder people in the name of > God. > > Peace, > Cathie > In a message dated 1/17/2005 7:32:05 PM Mountain Standard Time, > paulie-rainbow@u... writes: > > > For instance: when the > > >Crusaders were fighting for God, they were exempted > > >from their karma, but the moment one of them succumbed > > >to greed, and took that piece of jewelry or that money > > >pouch from his victims'corpses, and put it in his > > >pocket, it was no longer a "Holy" war from then on, > > >but a war for personal gain! > > > Lilith M. > > >################################################# Links / b.. c.. Sponsor document.write(''); / The all-new My – What will yours do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 1. Bhooshuddhi and bhootashddhi are two rituals involving complicated meditation that forms part of daily pracice of shaktas. These are practiced by the initiates. 2. INo i do not think inquisitors were "shaktas" or anything else that matters *smile* SophiasHeaven wrote: In a message dated 1/18/2005 11:20:21 AM Mountain Standard Time, kochu1tz writes: > a true blood shakta IS excempted from Karma as long as he does bhoo shuddhi and bhootashuddhi. What's shuddhi and bhootashuddhi? and having asked that, I would also remark, I seriuosly doubt the inquisitors were "true shaktas" -- isn't a shakta a hindu shaman who is devoted to Shakti??? blessings of the Goddeess, cathie / Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 I mean that even subtle fluctuations of mind and emotion are also karma. Only the supremely silent container of consciousness itself is free of all taint.And that container is more like the space inside the vase than the vase itself. - SophiasHeaven Tuesday, January 18, 2005 1:30 PM Re: Re: Karma In a message dated 1/18/2005 9:11:22 AM Mountain Standard Time, detective_mongo_phd writes: > Only the Absolute is free of karma. There are also meditation karmas. What's "meditation karmas"? / b.. c.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2005 Report Share Posted January 19, 2005 93 > SophiasHeaven@a... wrote: -- isn't a shakta a hindu shaman who is devoted to Shakti??? No. A shaman may be a shakta, but not every shakta is a shaman . However yes, every true shakta is devoted to Shakti - by definition. A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2005 Report Share Posted January 19, 2005 , SophiasHeaven@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 1/18/2005 8:56:56 AM Mountain Standard Time, > ammasmon@s... writes: > > > God is teaching them, patiently and slowly, without a doubt, using > > the tools of Unconditional Love and Witnessing, and who knows how > > many other tools. Anyway (from God's perspective of timelessness), > > why the hurry in teaching? We (limited in time and space) minds > > would like see everyone "taught" within our lifetimes of 50-100 > > years, but God's lifetime is billions of years, really speaking > > infinite time. > > This I agree with. Yet God is not always patient and kind. God can be > ruthless. Even Jesus, who everybody likes to make into a sugary piece of cake, > says things like "nation will rise against nation" and "i come not to bring > peace but a sword." The ruthlessness is only seemingly so. we experience it as such because of the duality we are in. In Oneness, all actions will be perceived as nothing but love. (this is not my experience yet, but I beileve by it). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 she said, "You have no good karma which I can make into better >prosperity for you. From where can I therefore get you anything? >Nonetheless, I have given you some extra tidbits in your soup. If you want >to make your life better so that I may help you in the future then you must >accrue some better karma. " > How many believe in Karma. My humble question is are there set of rules to accrue better karma and nullify bad karma? This is the statement that I am repeating from internet. If karma theory is real then the population that live below poverty line are victim of their own bad karma. This was asked in reference to India. raji. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 If karma theory is real then the population that live below poverty line are > victim of their own bad karma. This was asked in reference to India. raji. ----Knowledge of karma should be viewed as the study of medicine for alliviating future distress like a cure, rather than for lying on a mat feeling all fuzzy about ones present limitations. The concept of karma has been explained exhaustively in all Eastern philosophical circles. Knowledge of karma is always towards making a better life instead of just being content with things as they are. Thus, karma has foremostly been taught to refer to the cyclical nature of samsara for liberation thencefrom, rather than for making excuses about why one should strive for betterment. All people, even those most poor have the ability to become better and make better choices. First ingredient for doing so is intention to become liberated. Karma will change based on ones inner aspiration, before any outer action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 > > >-- All people, even those most poor have the ability to become better and >make >better choices. First ingredient for doing so is intention to become >liberated. Karma will change based on ones inner aspiration, before any >outer action. > I totall agree to the above logic. Recently, I was in Bangkok - it is sharp contrast to what I saw 20yrs back, I asked my guide to explain why I donot see begging bowl in Bangkok. SHE replied. Governemnt has come up with a policy - if they see such people they are put in a shelter home where they are not paid in cash, instead they are given shelter and food along with occupational training like weaving silk, handicraft etc. These product they sell to public and tourist. How simple and clever solution to a problem - I thought. Two birds are shot with one arrow. Cheap labour atthe same time no idle brain and income to governemnt. Can't this be implemented in India - where begging bowl use democracy as their safety net to stay on the street not wanting to work. This is where the difference between democracy and other system comes. How do you go about explaining karma theory with recent Mumbai Blast. Many well to do middle class lost their bread winners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2006 Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 Rajeshwari asked, "How do you go about explaining karma theory with recent Mumbai Blast. Many well to do middle class lost their bread winners" I was a lot disturbed while I was in college, about the sufferings in this world. I went about asking questions to people. Why is this world full of sufferings? Why innocent people are punished? A child just because born in a family in a slum, it suffers, not due to its fault. One day one person told me, "your question is like asking 'Why milk is white'. It is like that." Suddenly that light flashed through my brain. The problem starts when we want to explain everything with our logic. Many things cannot be explained with logic. Karma theory is a logical explanation of what happens in this world. It is perfectly logical to be illogical in some instances. We need a sixth sense to understand these. It is like being in this world with only four senses without eye sigh. Imagine things that we cannot explain, will be explained by a person with eye sight. But we will not be able to understand or accept them because we are not even aware of the FIFTH sense. Understanding and explaining is at the intellectual (budhi) level. Thing beyond the budhi tatva cannot be explained with budhi. Taranandanatha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2006 Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 Nicely said. - Nanda Saturday, August 19, 2006 3:43 AM Re: Karma Rajeshwari asked, "How do you go about explaining karma theory with recent Mumbai Blast. Many well to do middle class lost their bread winners" I was a lot disturbed while I was in college, about the sufferings in this world. I went about asking questions to people. Why is this world full of sufferings? Why innocent people are punished? A child just because born in a family in a slum, it suffers, not due to its fault. One day one person told me, "your question is like asking 'Why milk is white'. It is like that." Suddenly that light flashed through my brain. The problem starts when we want to explain everything with our logic. Many things cannot be explained with logic. Karma theory is a logical explanation of what happens in this world. It is perfectly logical to be illogical in some instances. We need a sixth sense to understand these. It is like being in this world with only four senses without eye sigh. Imagine things that we cannot explain, will be explained by a person with eye sight. But we will not be able to understand or accept them because we are not even aware of the FIFTH sense. Understanding and explaining is at the intellectual (budhi) level. Thing beyond the budhi tatva cannot be explained with budhi. Taranandanatha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2006 Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 "How do you go about explaining karma theory with recent Mumbai Blast. Many well to do middle class lost their bread winners" It was karma of the terrorist guys .... ... Oh wait! Our part has been not doing anything individually or collectively to stop those guys...it is called not being able to think beyond Bhoga and Vilasita. I expect such things will increase many fold in coming years. Nanda <nandakumarn (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Rajeshwari asked, "How do you go about explaining karma theory with recent Mumbai Blast. Many well to do middle class lost their bread winners" I was a lot disturbed while I was in college, about the sufferings in this world. I went about asking questions to people. Why is this world full of sufferings? Why innocent people are punished? A child just because born in a family in a slum, it suffers, not due to its fault. One day one person told me, "your question is like asking 'Why milk is white'. It is like that." Suddenly that light flashed through my brain. The problem starts when we want to explain everything with our logic. Many things cannot be explained with logic. Karma theory is a logical explanation of what happens in this world. It is perfectly logical to be illogical in some instances. We need a sixth sense to understand these. It is like being in this world with only four senses without eye sigh. Imagine things that we cannot explain, will be explained by a person with eye sight. But we will not be able to understand or accept them because we are not even aware of the FIFTH sense. Understanding and explaining is at the intellectual (budhi) level. Thing beyond the budhi tatva cannot be explained with budhi. Taranandanatha Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.