Guest guest Posted January 24, 2005 Report Share Posted January 24, 2005 I understand this is for Omprem, but a couple of comments. , Lili Masamura <sephirah5> wrote: >the reason the > Samaya Path is the "pure" one is because the people on > it are not in control of their animalistic tendencies > and have to follow a path that does not encourage > them. Substantiate your statement about Samaya path! Ex: I can call a person a theif. That doesnt mean he is. I gotta show evidence. Like wise, please show evidence for this. Otherwise, please take that statement back. Recently Nora posted from LS the meanings of Samaya. It is a good idea to read them before responding. Samayachara tatpara etc. >The Left-Hand Path is referred to as "heroic" > because to succeed with it you must be already in > control of your own lower nature. That is not the only opinion. They are multiple opinions about that. Ex: Some Tantriks think that it is for the lowly. Some for the advanced. What aout Divya path which is above(the Vamachara texts themselves say that) Vira where there is no usage of 5M. What about Kaulikottamas(highest Kaulas) who doesnt need real 5M either? Avalon mentions that some Vamachara sadhakas of Vatuka Bhairava(Boy Bhairava/ or Deviputra/ or Bhairavi tanaya as his sahasrnama says) dont touch women either. Think about that. Thx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2005 Report Share Posted January 24, 2005 As I understand there is a path for each. No amount of raving and ranting converts people. people choose paths or paths choose people. You may have your path; i will have mine. no amount of raving and ranting whill change that. I will not say any further. Some religions are famous for conversion. Hinduism is not one of them. We have no intention of converting any one. Some people may have residue of their conversionist religions we understand and are patient. Satish Raja Arigela <satisharigela wrote: I understand this is for Omprem, but a couple of comments. , Lili Masamura <sephirah5> wrote: >the reason the > Samaya Path is the "pure" one is because the people on > it are not in control of their animalistic tendencies > and have to follow a path that does not encourage > them. Substantiate your statement about Samaya path! Ex: I can call a person a theif. That doesnt mean he is. I gotta show evidence. Like wise, please show evidence for this. Otherwise, please take that statement back. Recently Nora posted from LS the meanings of Samaya. It is a good idea to read them before responding. Samayachara tatpara etc. >The Left-Hand Path is referred to as "heroic" > because to succeed with it you must be already in > control of your own lower nature. That is not the only opinion. They are multiple opinions about that. Ex: Some Tantriks think that it is for the lowly. Some for the advanced. What aout Divya path which is above(the Vamachara texts themselves say that) Vira where there is no usage of 5M. What about Kaulikottamas(highest Kaulas) who doesnt need real 5M either? Avalon mentions that some Vamachara sadhakas of Vatuka Bhairava(Boy Bhairava/ or Deviputra/ or Bhairavi tanaya as his sahasrnama says) dont touch women either. Think about that. Thx. / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2005 Report Share Posted January 24, 2005 No other animal has so much love that it can provide milk not only for its children but other species also. This is why the cow is considered holy by hindus. What would one feel if the female humans are being fed and milked by some other species to get milk and then later killed and eaten?. Anyway take everything in a humour also , :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.