Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 I totally agree with Nora. This is a very good forum and I have commented positively on the moderator's part more than once. Sometimes you should let people be. Many regard Sir John Woodroff's works as verbose and cluttered with jargon. So what? It is just someone's perspective. Others might find it useful. If someone finds OP as a lingam polisher, so be it. Lili Masamura <sephirah5 wrote: --- NMadasamy wrote: > > I have just receive an email from a concern member : > Why are we all > over omprem? ############################################ Best to ask: Why is he all over us all the time? I am just as happy to ignore him; leaves me more time to talk in depth about infinitely more worthwhile topics, like Ramakrishna,Shakti, the Bhagavad-Gita and all that, rather than crossing verbal swords with someone who needs to "pull the cork". These are my last words on the topic. Lilith M. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@2 > > Good question, As I have sugested before, it is best > to ignore > omprem as he is still undergoing a very troubling > time. I shall not > comment anything about him right now, as I have know > omprem, he is a > nice person and a friend, but somehow something is > not right. > > So my suggestion to others members especially lili, > please respect > the request of the moderators. > > > > > > > > Take Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile./maildemo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.