Guest guest Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 This is, hands down, the *best* analysis I have read of the whole Terri Shaivo mess that is currently gripping the United States. While it's a bit off-topic, I know a lot of members have been following and debating the case, and thought they might find this interesting. It's wrtten by Hendrick Hertzberg of the New Yorker, who is in my opinion the most brilliant political analyst writing in the U.S. today: MATTERS OF LIFE by Hendrik Hertzberg Issue of 2005-04-04 Posted 2005-03-28 Last week, Theresa Marie Schindler Schiavo, known to cable-news viewers and talk-radio listeners as Terri, was as ubiquitous as Elián González and Laci Peterson once were. Yet she was also hidden, obscured behind layers of political and religious posturing, legal maneuvering, emotional projection, and media exploitation that swaddled her like strips of linen around a mummy. Terri Schiavo was born on December 3, 1963, near Philadelphia, the first of three children of Robert and Mary Schindler. As a teen-ager, she was obese — at eighteen, she weighed two hundred and fifty pounds — but with diligence she lost a hundred pounds, and by the time she married Michael Schiavo, in 1984, she was an attractive and vivacious young woman. By the end of the decade, she had moved with her husband to Florida, was undergoing fertility treatments, and had slimmed down further, to a hundred and ten pounds. On February 25, 1990, Terri suffered cardiac arrest, leading to severe brain damage. The cause was a drastically reduced level of potassium in her bloodstream, a condition frequently associated with bulimia. Her death that day was forestalled by heroic measures, including a tracheotomy and ventilation. But when, after a few weeks, she emerged from a coma, it was only to enter a "persistent vegetative state," with no evidence or hope of improvement — a diagnosis that, in the fifteen years since, has been confirmed, with something close to unanimity, by many neurologists on many occasions on behalf of many courts. The principal internal organs of Terri's body, including her brain stem, which controls such involuntary actions as heartbeat, digestion, respiration, and the bodily sleep cycle, continued to function as long as liquid nourishment was provided through a tube threaded into her stomach through a hole in her abdomen. The exception was her cerebral cortex, which is the seat of language, of the processing of sense impressions, of thought, of awareness of one's surroundings and one's inner state—in short, of consciousness. Her EKG flatlined. The body lived; the mind died. "At this point," the Florida Supreme Court wrote six months ago, "much of her cerebral cortex is simply gone and has been replaced by cerebral spinal fluid. Medicine cannot cure this condition. Unless an act of God, a true miracle, were to recreate her brain, Theresa will always remain in an unconscious, reflexive state." Terri Schiavo's life, as distinct from the life of her unsentient organs, ended fifteen years ago. But that did not prevent her from becoming the star of an unusually morbid kind of reality TV show. The show was made possible by two factors. The first was a bitter struggle between Terri's husband, Michael Schiavo, who wanted to allow her body to die in accordance with what he said, and what an unbroken series of court decisions has affirmed, was her own expressed wish, and her parents and siblings, who wanted to keep her body alive at all costs. The second factor was a set of video snippets, provided by the Schindler family and broadcast incessantly by the three cable news networks — CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC — which are themselves entangled in a desperate struggle for dominance. Sometimes the snippets are identified by the year of their taping (2001 and 2002); sometimes they are not. Sometimes they are accompanied by inflammatory captions (fighting for her life); sometimes the captions are merely dramatic (schiavo saga). They show Terri's blinking eyes seeming to follow a balloon waved in front of her; or her mouth agape in a rictus that could be interpreted as a smile; or her face turned toward her mother's, with her head thrown back, Pietà-like. As neurologists who have examined her have explained, the snippets are profoundly misleading. A few seconds of maximum suggestiveness culled from many hours of tape, they are more in the nature of special effects than of a documentary record. Without them, there would have been no show — and, most likely, no televised vigils outside her hospice, no cries of "murder" from Tom DeLay, the egregious House Majority Leader; no midnight special sessions of the House and Senate; no calling Dr. Frist for a snap video diagnosis; no visuals of President Bush returning from Texas to land on the White House south lawn, striding dramatically across the grass as if it were the deck of an aircraft carrier. To read through the documents generated by the years of legal wrangling over Terri Schiavo is to be impressed by the thoroughness and conscientiousness with which the courts, especially the Florida courts, approached her case. On legal, substantive, and constitutional grounds, they seemed to have reason and justice on their side. Yet it was a cold sort of reason and justice. On a human level, it was hard to see what concrete harm there could be in indulging her family's desire to keep her body alive, its care presumably underwritten by the hospice and the family's supporters. Meanwhile, the language of the debate over her fate, pitting a "right to die" against a "right to life," turned rancid in its abstraction. Terri Schiavo, the person, had no further use for a right to die, because Terri Schiavo, the person, had long since exercised that right. Did it really matter if she had told her husband, when she was young and healthy, that she would not wish to live "that way"? Her body notwithstanding, she was not living "that way," or any other way. By the same token, she had no use for a right to life, because her ability to benefit from such a right had long ago been rendered as moot as the legal pleadings on her alleged behalf would soon become. As the week progressed, it was harder and harder to deny that the fervor of Terri's Christianist "supporters" was motivated by dogmas unrelated to her or her rights. If she truly had a "right to life," if removing her feeding tube was truly tantamount to murder, then neither the disapproval nor the approval of her family (or anyone else) could make the slightest moral difference. If her parents had agreed with her husband that the tube should be removed, would their acquiescence have somehow transubstantiated murder into mercy? And, with or without their acquiescence, if Michael Schiavo had spent the last ten years adhering strictly to the orthodox code of family values — if he had remained faithfully celibate, if he had not taken a mistress and had children with her—then might not some of those now accusing him of murder be demanding that his Biblically ordained husbandly authority be respected? Terri Schiavo has become a metaphor in the religio-cultural struggle over abortion. This — along with the advantages of demonizing the judiciary in preparation for the coming battle over Supreme Court nominees — explains the eagerness of Republican politicians to embrace her parents' cause. Her lack of awareness actually increased her metaphoric usefulness. Like a sixty-four-cell blastocyst, she was without consciousness. Unlike the blastocyst, she was without potential. If letting her body die is murder, goes the logic, then thwarting the development of the blastocyst can surely be nothing less. Last weekend, as Good Friday gave way to Holy Saturday and Holy Saturday to Easter Sunday, Florida's made-for-TV passion play neared its climax. The death of Terri Schiavo's body will only enhance her symbolic value, elevating her to her destined place as another martyr in this dismal age of martyrs. SOURCE: The New Yorker URL: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/050404ta_talk_hertzberg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 I have to reply to this post with great care. Let me first state I can say very little of what I know as facts, reason being there was a point in time that the young lady you are speaking of was in the care of my place of employmet prior to being moved to hospice. I do want to say thank you for this post, it is factual as it can be, her husband a very caring husband I must say. For many years he was there 5 out 7 days a week, making sure her care was at it's best standard. The law suit that rendered the large sum of money in the beginning came from his law suit against to pharmco. company that manafactored the drugs she was self taken at the time of her cardiac arrest. I must also add that she is now located 4 blocks from my home, it takes a great deal of time for me and many others to pass the area to and from our job. All due to the protestors that jump infront of your car. People that have no clue of her true conditon, never seen her ect...This is all very sad for the Pt. her husband, and her parents. However what is taken place is no longer about the Pt. It brings to mind the scenes on may see outside a abortion clinic. The right to live and the right to die can not be dictated by politics, none of this is about Mrs. Shaivo. I wish I could tell you what she looked like a few years back, and how with her decending condition what she looks like now. What you are seeing on TV is not the truth. Her husband and her caregivers are not the monsters they are made out to be. All that we learn from this is that at birth, arrangements about our death need to be in place. .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2005 Report Share Posted March 31, 2005 I read this article today morning : Terri Schiavo Dies but Feud Continues, and this statement caught my attention : Gov. Jeb Bush said that millions of people around the world will be "deeply grieved" by her death but that the debate over her fate could help others grapple with end-of-life issues. Had a good laugh over this. I remembered a joke somebody told me once : "The British still thinks they rule the world, and The Americans think they are the world" [ this is my edition ] and they think the whole world revolve around them ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2005 Report Share Posted March 31, 2005 She's with God now and that's the important thing. Let her soul rest in peace. May Mother Bless Her Soul . Jai Maha Kali Shakti. -Lawrence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.