Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 A friend of mine (let's call her Carrie) is a big devotee of a Tamil Siddha who calls himself Baba Shri Siva. I've been a guest of Carrie's at public satsangs held by Shri Siva in New York -- they are expensive, I can't afford them, and Carrie can't treat me to them very often. Shri Siva has some power as a Guru, and his teachings are interesting, but he obviously is aiming for a following among America's money-ed Yuppies. I am a devotee of Ammachi of Kerala, and I've taken Carrie to have darshan of Ammachi as well. Carrie is not impressed; she says Ammachi is a nice lady who hugs people. Shri Siva, she says, chants in a way that raises her kundalini, and besides, his teachings are more valuable if they are expensive. (This makes me laugh.) Recently, Carrie told me that devotees who paid hundreds of dollars to Shri Siva for private darshan have gotten special E-mail notices. A source of yantras and other Hindu religious devices is making limited editions of panch-loka murthies of Shri Siva, which the devotees can buy for lots of bucks. Carrie is considering buying one. My question: Is this a usual procedure in Hinduism? I know that the ISKCON people sell statues of Swami Prabhupad for worship. I also believe the SYDA Yoga people make available statues of Swami Nityananda, suitable for performing puja upon. But Prabhupad and Nityananda have dropped their bodies. Is it normal to worship a murthi of one's spiritual preceptor while he is still alive? Carrie points out that Ammachi's followers sell huggable Amma dolls for plenty of money, too. But the dolls aren't being worshipped (I don't think they are, anyway). Carrie is thinking that the Shri Siva murthi will be an investment, as well as a source of bhakti. And besides, she points out, Shri Siva is thin and distinguished-looking. She thinks Ammachi is fat and commonplace. I don't understand my friend Carrie at all. Comments? -- Len/ Kalipadma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Wow. Just from what you say, I much prefer the Carrie of Stephen King's story from years ago (played by Sissie Spacek in the movie). She was a very powerful person whose strong emotions caused some havoc, but she was likeable. Maybe Carrie can spring for you to scan that picture you posted about awhile back...? I guess, each to her/his own. But does Carrie need to justify her attraction to her guru by putting your guru down? She is entitled to choose what works best for her. The divine is still divine, and works its wonders in its ways. If someone knows that this guru of hers is a fraud, and/or is bilking folks out of their life savings or something, that's another matter, too. It's nice that you brought her to Amma for darshan. BTW I have read of Amma recommending that a person go to another guru (other than herself, that is); not sure which guru, but I recall either reading it or hearing about it, that she recommended a man to go work with a male guru. , Len Rosenberg <kalipadma108> wrote: > > A friend of mine (let's call her Carrie) is a big > devotee of a Tamil Siddha who calls himself Baba Shri > Siva. I've been a guest of Carrie's at public > satsangs held by Shri Siva in New York -- they are > expensive, I can't afford them, and Carrie can't treat > me to them very often. > > Shri Siva has some power as a Guru, and his teachings > are interesting, but he obviously is aiming for a > following among America's money-ed Yuppies. I am a > devotee of Ammachi of Kerala, and I've taken Carrie to > have darshan of Ammachi as well. Carrie is not > impressed; she says Ammachi is a nice lady who hugs > people. Shri Siva, she says, chants in a way that > raises her kundalini, and besides, his teachings are > more valuable if they are expensive. (This makes me > laugh.) > > Recently, Carrie told me that devotees who paid > hundreds of dollars to Shri Siva for private darshan > have gotten special E-mail notices. A source of > yantras and other Hindu religious devices is making > limited editions of panch-loka murthies of Shri Siva, > which the devotees can buy for lots of bucks. Carrie > is considering buying one. > > My question: Is this a usual procedure in Hinduism? > I know that the ISKCON people sell statues of Swami > Prabhupad for worship. I also believe the SYDA Yoga > people make available statues of Swami Nityananda, > suitable for performing puja upon. But Prabhupad and > Nityananda have dropped their bodies. Is it normal to > worship a murthi of one's spiritual preceptor while he > is still alive? > > Carrie points out that Ammachi's followers sell > huggable Amma dolls for plenty of money, too. But the > dolls aren't being worshipped (I don't think they are, > anyway). Carrie is thinking that the Shri Siva murthi > will be an investment, as well as a source of bhakti. > And besides, she points out, Shri Siva is thin and > distinguished-looking. She thinks Ammachi is fat and > commonplace. > > I don't understand my friend Carrie at all. > > Comments? > > -- Len/ Kalipadma > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Dear Len I also see Ammachi and Sri Karunamayi when they come to NYC , at both visits there are pictures of Amma's on brochures even pictures lets say of Devi Gayatri who's head is replaced by one of the Amma's to make it look like Amma is Sri Lalhita etc.... ultimately this is what they represent . I have read in Awaken Children about how Amma guided one Swami to look at her picture while meditating She sad that will bring him closer to His inner spirit .. In India there are whole ceremonies devoted to Guru worship ( in this case a statue would not surprise me ) . The fact that a certain Guru passed on does not change the relevance or potency of a teacher Shirdi Baba is perfect example here , to this day many devotees claim to feel or sense His guidance , Shirdi Temple has Shirdi Statue that is being worshiped in sense of representation . The only factor to me in your experience for myself that I would question is the money being collected . As You know yourself both Ammas give free public programs to me that is a sign of genuine teacher, however somebody else maybe need to pay lots of money to feel truth I personally don't . Guru Stotra describes Guru , it might give you further insight on to worship of Guru . You also mentioned your friends attitude towards the look of the Guru in this case Amma's size hmmmmm, has your friend ever read ' Beauty and the Beast ' that is not to diminish on Amma's attractiveness however the morale of the story can hardly be disregarded here. One of the favorite Goddesses comes to mind is Dumati Goddess Who is anything but beautiful , Who protects Her children with this cloud of unattractive illusion. joanna p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Comments? -- Len/ Kalipadma =====We've all stepped in shit before, so if you smell it, you will know that someone stepped in it. Don't ever not trust your intuition. It's all you have between yourself and the wolves that circle. As for your friend. there's no accounting for taste, but don't be judgemental towards her in any way. She is doing what she thinks is right. Either way. that's pretty lovable. It's when the emails stop and he himself starts calling at 2:00 am that would be truely telling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 am that would be truely telling. ----Siva Baba at one point was Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's student and Maharishi wanted him to head the India side of his operation but Sivababa decided to break out on his own, though obviously not over ideological differences, but because there was more money in being independent. Today religion is as big a seller as street drugs with about as much benefit, and is being pushed much in the same way. Personally I think street drugs are more beneficial than false religions which have nothing but the creation of cash cows as their source course and goal. At least street drugs work. I'm really surprised that people still buy such patent crap but then people also are still addicted to crack cocaine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 , Len Rosenberg <kalipadma108> wrote: > And besides, she points out, Shri Siva is thin and > distinguished-looking. She thinks Ammachi is fat and > commonplace. > > I don't understand my friend Carrie at all. > > Comments? > > -- Len/ Kalipadma Hi Kalipadma, I think, all of your friend's points comparing the Guru's actions or the practices of the organization may be valid (atleast for her). so no comments on that. But the one above (physical appearance) is an odious reason for putting down. Amma's superior beauty is that she hides her divinity in the commonplace. Ever seen her eyes when she looks at somebody for just a second? They flash! and then they go "commonplace" again. All I can say is that your friend has a fixed idea of where divinity can be found (noble, distinguished-looking etc), and hence she is not able to see it in Amma...... for what it is worth, I had similar ideas too, till Amma came into my life and subtly fixed my paradigm of finding divinity. BTW, I would not be surprised if some of Amma's devotees worship the dolls (made as they are of Amma-worn garments). I know some of them place the dolls on the altar when they are not travelling with them. Jai Ma! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 , swastik108@a... wrote: > In a message dated 5/8/2005 2:24:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > kalipadma108 writes: > Comments? > I have seen people praying to images of living Gurus who they are disciples > of during pujas. Many people give offerings to pictures of Sai Baba and I have > seen things like this so I would have to say it isn't totally unheard of > although perhaps less common. > > It made me think of the Roman temples they would build to the emporers and > the Eyptian belief of the Pharoah as sun god with temples to him also. > > You mentioned that the devotees can buy the pancha murthis for "lots of > bucks" the money factor involved in his teachings raises a lot of questions for me. > > > Namaste, In the local Hindu temple I visited yesterday there is a statue of Sai Baba of Shirdi installed similar to the way the deities were installed and seemed to be worshipped in the same way. I was a little surprised myself, because this is the first time I had seen this. However, this is not at all different from the practices surrounding catholic saints. As to the young woman who prefers the thin rich male guru over the chubby huggy female guru, this may well because she has been taught over her life to associate feelings of spirituality and mystery with whatever this male guru is offering. We are all called to the divine differently. There's no need to judge that. However, if you are concerned that she is being ripped off, you may wish to express your concerns so to clear your conscience...and then leave the adult alone. We have a right to our own choices. People get ripped off in the name of religion every day. If however, you're just miffed that she's being judgemental about your choices and you're trying to sting her back in return...perhaps you'll want to find a way to stop the cycle of bickering before you lose a friend with whom you seem to have a lot in common....in function if not in form. Blessings, prainbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 It is valuable to move beyond the surface - that is, while your friend may not see beyond the surface of her judgments of Amma, are you experiencing judgments of her guru? Or, maybe it's just unfamiliar, another way than you know...? I have been listening to Deepak Chopra's Creating Affluence on CD recently. I purchased the book long ago, and then began buying copies for friends. In fact, I found it through amazon.com for 1 penny per copy. Of course, shipping costs were $3.49, but still! And how funny that a book called Creating Affluence - Wealth Consciousness in the Field of All Possibilities, would be going for .01! It's perfect, actually. Deepak -- also a student of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi -- says that money is life energy, and must flow, like blood, or it clots and clogs. He said that years ago, when the Maharishi was talking about a world hunger project, someone piped up after listening to the plans: "Where's all the money going to come from?" His answer: "From where it is at the moment." I love that -- it means dream and plan and bring it to life in the world. Or, like that book by Marsha Sinetar, Do What You Love: The Money Will Follow. I don't know anything about your friend's guru, but I agree with Deepak Chopra, Marsha Sinetar, and the Maharishi about money. And Amma certainly knows the value of money, or she wouldn't have pledged $23M to tsunami relief, in addition to all the other causes to which Amma tirelessly contributes. And in addition to Amma's flashing eyes, her voice is mellifluous. I just looked that word up - - I thought it meant "melodious," but it means "flowing with honey." Perfect! BTW does anyone know what the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is doing these days? How old is he? Sorry for my ignorance - he may even be dead for all I know. Someone in my office -- a bankruptcy attorney, no less -- was referring to him judgmentally as someone who bilks people. That seems to be a common fear or belief. But on what is it based re the Maharishi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 BTW does anyone know what the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is doing these days? How old is he? Sorry for my ignorance - he may even be dead for all I know. Someone in my office -- a bankruptcy attorney, no less -- was referring to him judgmentally as someone who bilks people. That seems to be a common fear or belief. But on what is it based re the Maharishi? ---If you want to know what Maharishi is doing you need to join the Fairfield Life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 True teacher Guru A true teacher or Guru ( self realized master ) will never collect money for self inclined pleasures and comforts such is belief in ancient India , there is a lot of scam artists charging hundreds if not thousands opening the road to money flowing river of nirvana , that is not the purpose of True Self Realized Guru . Both Amma's Ammachi and Sri Karunamayi ask for donations to help once in need , however they do not use the money for their own comforts . Shirdi was also know to take money from devotees and instantly passing the money to someone in need. I am very weary of Chopras million dollars homes and totally overpriced health spa's . If that is being judgmental then where is common sense ? . regards, jp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 > > > My question: Is this a usual procedure in Hinduism? > I know that the ISKCON people sell statues of Swami > Prabhupad for worship. I also believe the SYDA Yoga > people make available statues of Swami Nityananda, > suitable for performing puja upon. But Prabhupad and > Nityananda have dropped their bodies. Is it normal to > worship a murthi of one's spiritual preceptor while he > is still alive? > Len: This Sri Siva definitely has some power, I have studied some of his teachings and they are probably among the most potent practices I have come across. Also he visited Guruji's Amrita's temple in India and seems to have a high regard for Guruji Amrita. I am not sure if he is enlightened though and am somewhat disappointed by the recent attempts to deify him as a great divine master/incarnation (he does have an association with self help guru Wayne Dyer). Considering that his following is not very wide and he has not been around for long, making statues of him are definitely unusual in my opinion. > Carrie points out that Ammachi's followers sell > huggable Amma dolls for plenty of money, too. But the > dolls aren't being worshipped (I don't think they are, > anyway). Carrie is thinking that the Shri Siva murthi > will be an investment, as well as a source of bhakti. > And besides, she points out, Shri Siva is thin and > distinguished-looking. She thinks Ammachi is fat and > commonplace. > Ah! Pearls cast before swine are just wasted LOL. All the money from Ammachi.org sales go fully towards charity, I cannot say the same for others. -yogaman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 , "childofdevi" <childofdevi> wrote: > > > > Carrie points out that Ammachi's followers sell > > huggable Amma dolls for plenty of money, too. But the > > dolls aren't being worshipped (I don't think they are, > > anyway). Carrie is thinking that the Shri Siva murthi > > will be an investment, as well as a source of bhakti. > > And besides, she points out, Shri Siva is thin and > > distinguished-looking. She thinks Ammachi is fat and > > commonplace. > > > > > Ah! Pearls cast before swine are just wasted LOL. All the money from > Ammachi.org sales go fully towards charity, I cannot say the same for > others. > > -yogaman Yes. I think people are hugging the Amma dolls, but who knows what goes on behind closed doors I think that the money flows through Amma's organization(s) to where it is needed and intended to go is proof of the 'money as life energy, like blood' idea. I am reminded of Gandhi's autobiography in which he said there was always some miracle that came along and made ends meet financially. Each month he would fear he would have to close the ashram, and on his doorstep would appear the money to keep it going from sources he had never known existed until they showed up. And that reminds me of George Bush Senior's campaign song - of course, it had nothing to do with George Bush other than that he used it -- and I think the songwriter may have asked him to stop using it -- but as an affluent person, GB Sr. would understand this philosophy, even if he was out of touch with common folk: Bobby McFerrin - "Don't Worry, Be Happy" Here's a little song I wrote You might want to sing it note for note Don't worry, be happy. In every life we have some trouble But when you worry you make it double Don't worry, be happy. Don't worry, be happy now. Chorus: Don't worry, be happy. Don't worry, be happy. Don't worry, be happy. Don't worry, be happy. Ain't got no place to lay your head Somebody came and took your bed Don't worry, be happy. The landlord say your rent is late He may have to litigate Don't worry, be happy. Chorus: (Look at me -- I'm happy. Don't worry, be happy. Here I give you my phone number. When you worry, call me, I make you happy. Don't worry, be happy.) Ain't got no cash, ain't got no style Ain't got no gal to make you smile Don't worry, be happy. 'Cause when you worry your face will frown And that will bring everybody down Don't worry, be happy. Chorus: (Don't worry, don't worry, don't do it. Be happy. Put a smile on your face. Don't bring everybody down. Don't worry. It will soon pass, whatever it is. Don't worry, be happy. I'm not worried, I'm happy...)." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 --- swastik108 wrote: > > I have seen people praying to images of living Gurus > who they are disciples > of during pujas. Many people give offerings to > pictures of Sai Baba and I have > seen things like this so I would have to say it > isn't totally unheard of > although perhaps less common. Okay. I have a small framed photo of Ammachi (my Guru) on my altar. At the beginning of every puja, I bow to Ganesha, to the Guru, and to the Ishtadevata. But I have to admit to feeling a little queasy about doing a full puja TO Amma. I even feel funny about reciting the 108 holy names that someone decided were appropriate to apply towards Ammachi. But then, I'm an ignorant Westerner! When I'm in Ammachi's presence, I'm fully aware that she is manifesting all the power and grace of Parashakti or of Brahman (especially when she's in Devi Bhava mode!). But worshipping the symbol of a living human (albeit the vehicle of a Mahatma) seems... odd? slightly sacriligious? presumptuous? > You mentioned that the devotees can buy the pancha > murthis for "lots of > bucks" the money factor involved in his teachings > raises a lot of questions for me. For me, too, Swastik. For me, too. -- Len/ Kalipadma Make your home page http://www./r/hs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 --- prainbow61 <paulie-rainbow wrote: > > In the local Hindu temple I visited yesterday there > is a statue of Sai Baba of Shirdi installed > similar to the way the deities were installed and > seemed to be worshipped in the same > way. I was a little surprised myself, because this > is the first time I had seen this. > > However, this is not at all different from the > practices surrounding catholic saints. Again, it seems different to me when one is worshipping (or invoking divine intercession) from saints who are no longer in their bodies. Puja to living saints, I'm less comfortable with. > As to the young woman who prefers the thin rich male > guru over the chubby huggy female > guru, this may well because she has been taught over > her life to associate feelings of > spirituality and mystery with whatever this male > guru is offering. Yeah. She's also obsessed with personal weight loss, and judges heaviness in other people as a character flaw. (She even has difficulty relating spiritually to the deva Ganesha because "he's so unattractive!") > We are all called to the divine differently. There's > no need to judge that. > > However, if you are concerned that she is being > ripped off, you may wish to express your > concerns so to clear your conscience...and then > leave the adult alone. We have a right to > our own choices. People get ripped off in the name > of religion every day. > > If however, you're just miffed that she's being > judgemental about your choices and you're > trying to sting her back in return... Maybe I'm jealous. I enjoy Shri Siva's presentations, but I can't afford them. He's aiming at a rich audience, and that's not me, alas. > perhaps you'll > want to find a way to stop the cycle of > bickering before you lose a friend with whom you > seem to have a lot in common....in > function if not in form. We're not at the bickering stage, yet. Have we a lot in common? She's a coven-sister. I co-run a Wiccan group, which (since I have input in what gets taught) has "a strong flavor of curry." Carrie obviously enjoys the Hindu references I bring to my version of Western Neo-Paganism (except for that sloppy-looking Ganesha, of course). -- Len/ Kalipadma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 , Len Rosenberg <kalipadma108> wrote: > > Again, it seems different to me when one is > worshipping (or invoking divine intercession) from > saints who are no longer in their bodies. Puja to > living saints, I'm less comfortable with. I share your discomfort; it seems to me that in worshipping a living being there may be extra potential for confusion on the part of the ordinary worshipper. I seem to recall that Sri Ramakrishna performed puja to his wife, so there is some sort of precedent, at least for the extraordinary worshipper who is not at all confused about the nature of the divine! > [Len's coven-sister] even has difficulty relating spiritually > to the deva Ganesha because "he's so unattractive!") > [....] that sloppy-looking Ganesha, [....] Hmmm. I'm trying to imagine what a toned and buff Ganesha (Gold's Gym Ganesha?) would look like. I think this may be beyond me. At least on a Monday morning. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 If I can find a program that will let me do it -- and I'm looking for just such a program now -- I will create the image of which you speak, taking Ganesha's head (and why not, didn't Shiva himself do this?) and putting onto the body of a muscleman , "msbauju" <msbauju> wrote: > , Len Rosenberg > <kalipadma108> wrote: > > > > Again, it seems different to me when one is > > worshipping (or invoking divine intercession) from > > saints who are no longer in their bodies. Puja to > > living saints, I'm less comfortable with. > > I share your discomfort; it seems to me that in worshipping a living > being there may be extra potential for confusion on the part of the > ordinary worshipper. > > I seem to recall that Sri Ramakrishna performed puja to his wife, so > there is some sort of precedent, at least for the extraordinary > worshipper who is not at all confused about the nature of the divine! > > > [Len's coven-sister] even has difficulty relating spiritually > > to the deva Ganesha because "he's so unattractive!") > > [....] that sloppy-looking Ganesha, [....] > > Hmmm. I'm trying to imagine what a toned and buff Ganesha (Gold's > Gym Ganesha?) would look like. I think this may be beyond me. At > least on a Monday morning. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 You're right; there's precedent both east and west for this! Jesus' image comes west and gets blond hair, blue eyes, and very Anglo features. Ganesha gets a diet, gym membership, and a personal trainer. ;-) Just think--given how much fun particular Western scholars had psychoanalyzing the imagery of Ganesha's limp trunk, they would have a field day with *this* transformation. , "Mary Ann" <buttercookie61> wrote: > If I can find a program that will let me do it -- and I'm looking for > just such a program now -- I will create the image of which you > speak, taking Ganesha's head !!!!! > (and why not, didn't Shiva himself do > this?) !!!! > and putting onto the body of a muscleman > > , "msbauju" <msbauju> > > Hmmm. I'm trying to imagine what a toned and buff Ganesha (Gold's > > Gym Ganesha?) would look like. I think this may be beyond me. At > > least on a Monday morning. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 For me, the common sense would be that if the principles work for creating affluence, which isn't just about making money, but about developing a state of awareness and being, then anyone can utilize those principles and put the results of that into practice however they see fit. , joanna pollner <joannapollner> wrote: > True teacher Guru > > A true teacher or Guru ( self realized master ) will never collect > money for self inclined pleasures and comforts such is belief in ancient India , there is a lot of scam artists charging hundreds if not thousands opening the road to money flowing river of nirvana , > that is not the purpose of True Self Realized Guru . > > Both Amma's Ammachi and Sri Karunamayi ask for donations to help once in need , however they do not use the money for their own comforts . Shirdi was also know to take money from devotees and instantly passing > the money to someone in need. I am very weary of Chopras million dollars homes and totally overpriced health spa's . If that is > being judgmental then where is common sense ? . > > regards, jp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 I see no connection between cash, flow and heart value, or value in general, as one single rib has more value to a starving family of six, than a whole truckload of cows to a fat rancher. Money is a symbol. Nothing more. When spirituality is equated into money then the person doing the equating is following money. It's pretty simple really. No sadhu in the entire world is willing to sell God or spirituality for fear of falling into the greatest mistake of karma, and then having to figure it all out again. If money is your God then say so. That goes for Sivababa, Maharishi, Chopra, and the others who care more for cash in wallet than faith in God. It's really pretty sick. - Mary Ann Monday, May 09, 2005 3:19 PM Re: Statues of Gurus For me, the common sense would be that if the principles work for creating affluence, which isn't just about making money, but about developing a state of awareness and being, then anyone can utilize those principles and put the results of that into practice however they see fit. , joanna pollner <joannapollner> wrote: > True teacher Guru > > A true teacher or Guru ( self realized master ) will never collect > money for self inclined pleasures and comforts such is belief in ancient India , there is a lot of scam artists charging hundreds if not thousands opening the road to money flowing river of nirvana , > that is not the purpose of True Self Realized Guru . > > Both Amma's Ammachi and Sri Karunamayi ask for donations to help once in need , however they do not use the money for their own comforts . Shirdi was also know to take money from devotees and instantly passing > the money to someone in need. I am very weary of Chopras million dollars homes and totally overpriced health spa's . If that is > being judgmental then where is common sense ? . > > regards, jp Links / b.. c.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 Dear Eve i absolutely agree with you , there is no connection of cash and heart, unfortunately todays eastern or western evangelists seem to make it look like cash flow energy makes the heart beat . I am not saying sway off the money all together , however a spiritual teacher cashing in on gizmo Om chantings certainly is cheap trick of the trade . The bright site to this is that there are also very genuine teachers out there with true perspective and common sense on such things even as money. Wealth is ok only if it is based on balanced principle meaning sharing . Both Ammas teach that quite simply and so does Shirdi Baba. regards, jp i am sorry if that will sound offending , but i really dont understand how can some people just believe such fake Gurus ? Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail./mailtour.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 What I have read and heard in Deepak Chopra's teachings (and that's the closest I've come to the Maharishi's teachings, other than the high school experience I related earlier) is that money is an energy, and as you say, a symbol, but not a stagnant thing. As such, it is possible to enter the current (currency) of that symbol -- which also correlates with electromagnetism, energy force/source, etc. -- and manifest from the place we/God/dess manifest(s) from. We do it all the time unconsciously, mostly repeating past patterns, karma, etc. -- including family or personal patterns of poverty. The idea from the teachings I am familiar with is that it is possible to bring more consciousness into the process, and to flow better with the unconscious, to manifest what we choose. The principles I have read about/listened to make sense and are in accordance with yogic and/or Vedic teachings, and physics. I don't think there's an automatic connection between cash flow and heart value. But you can choose to do whatever you want with your affluence, whether it's money, or all the other wondrous things and qualities the universe holds. Remember, as Ralph Waldo Emerson said: Without a rich heart, wealth is an ugly beggar. , "Eve__69" <eve__69@h...> wrote: > I see no connection between cash, flow and heart value, or value in general, as one single rib has more value to a starving family of six, than a whole truckload of cows to a fat rancher. Money is a symbol. Nothing more. When spirituality is equated into money then the person doing the equating is following money. It's pretty simple really. No sadhu in the entire world is willing to sell God or spirituality for fear of falling into the greatest mistake of karma, and then having to figure it all out again. If money is your God then say so. That goes for Sivababa, Maharishi, Chopra, and the others who care more for cash in wallet than faith in God. It's really pretty sick. > - > Mary Ann > > Monday, May 09, 2005 3:19 PM > Re: Statues of Gurus > > > For me, the common sense would be that if the principles work for > creating affluence, which isn't just about making money, but about > developing a state of awareness and being, then anyone can utilize > those principles and put the results of that into practice however they > see fit. > > , joanna pollner > <joannapollner> wrote: > > True teacher Guru > > > > A true teacher or Guru ( self realized master ) will never collect > > money for self inclined pleasures and comforts such is belief in > ancient India , there is a lot of scam artists charging hundreds if > not thousands opening the road to money flowing river of nirvana , > > that is not the purpose of True Self Realized Guru . > > > > Both Amma's Ammachi and Sri Karunamayi ask for donations to help once > in need , however they do not use the money for their own comforts . > Shirdi was also know to take money from devotees and instantly passing > > the money to someone in need. I am very weary of Chopras million > dollars homes and totally overpriced health spa's . If that is > > being judgmental then where is common sense ? . > > > > regards, jp > > > > > - ----------- > Links > > > / > > b.. > > > c.. Terms of Service. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 That was a lot of verbaige for a simple truth. Call money what you want but don't equate its acquisition with holiness. Don't ever make that mistake. Look at it differently. We are here discussing the worship of gurus most of whom were either lowly, deemed crazy by society, or poor. So instead by your logic we should worship donald trump, and all the other rich people. How about the Bush dynasty? Yada, you get the idea. - Mary Ann Monday, May 09, 2005 7:15 PM Re: Statues of Gurus What I have read and heard in Deepak Chopra's teachings (and that's the closest I've come to the Maharishi's teachings, other than the high school experience I related earlier) is that money is an energy, and as you say, a symbol, but not a stagnant thing. As such, it is possible to enter the current (currency) of that symbol -- which also correlates with electromagnetism, energy force/source, etc. -- and manifest from the place we/God/dess manifest(s) from. We do it all the time unconsciously, mostly repeating past patterns, karma, etc. -- including family or personal patterns of poverty. The idea from the teachings I am familiar with is that it is possible to bring more consciousness into the process, and to flow better with the unconscious, to manifest what we choose. The principles I have read about/listened to make sense and are in accordance with yogic and/or Vedic teachings, and physics. I don't think there's an automatic connection between cash flow and heart value. But you can choose to do whatever you want with your affluence, whether it's money, or all the other wondrous things and qualities the universe holds. Remember, as Ralph Waldo Emerson said: Without a rich heart, wealth is an ugly beggar. , "Eve__69" <eve__69@h...> wrote: > I see no connection between cash, flow and heart value, or value in general, as one single rib has more value to a starving family of six, than a whole truckload of cows to a fat rancher. Money is a symbol. Nothing more. When spirituality is equated into money then the person doing the equating is following money. It's pretty simple really. No sadhu in the entire world is willing to sell God or spirituality for fear of falling into the greatest mistake of karma, and then having to figure it all out again. If money is your God then say so. That goes for Sivababa, Maharishi, Chopra, and the others who care more for cash in wallet than faith in God. It's really pretty sick. > - > Mary Ann > > Monday, May 09, 2005 3:19 PM > Re: Statues of Gurus > > > For me, the common sense would be that if the principles work for > creating affluence, which isn't just about making money, but about > developing a state of awareness and being, then anyone can utilize > those principles and put the results of that into practice however they > see fit. > > , joanna pollner > <joannapollner> wrote: > > True teacher Guru > > > > A true teacher or Guru ( self realized master ) will never collect > > money for self inclined pleasures and comforts such is belief in > ancient India , there is a lot of scam artists charging hundreds if > not thousands opening the road to money flowing river of nirvana , > > that is not the purpose of True Self Realized Guru . > > > > Both Amma's Ammachi and Sri Karunamayi ask for donations to help once > in need , however they do not use the money for their own comforts . > Shirdi was also know to take money from devotees and instantly passing > > the money to someone in need. I am very weary of Chopras million > dollars homes and totally overpriced health spa's . If that is > > being judgmental then where is common sense ? . > > > > regards, jp > > > > > - ----------- > Links > > > / > > b.. > > > c.. Terms of Service. > > > > Links / b.. c.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 The only idea I get from your replies to me on this topic is that you are missing the meaning in what I'm saying. Take your own advice: look at it differently. , "Eve__69" <eve__69@h...> wrote: > That was a lot of verbaige for a simple truth. Call money what you want but don't equate its acquisition with holiness. Don't ever make that mistake. > > Look at it differently. We are here discussing the worship of gurus most of whom were either lowly, deemed crazy by society, or poor. So instead by your logic we should worship donald trump, and all the other rich people. How about the Bush dynasty? Yada, you get the idea. > > > - > Mary Ann > > Monday, May 09, 2005 7:15 PM > Re: Statues of Gurus > > > What I have read and heard in Deepak Chopra's teachings (and that's > the closest I've come to the Maharishi's teachings, other than the > high school experience I related earlier) is that money is an > energy, and as you say, a symbol, but not a stagnant thing. As such, > it is possible to enter the current (currency) of that symbol -- > which also correlates with electromagnetism, energy force/source, > etc. -- and manifest from the place we/God/dess manifest(s) from. We > do it all the time unconsciously, mostly repeating past patterns, > karma, etc. -- including family or personal patterns of poverty. The > idea from the teachings I am familiar with is that it is possible to > bring more consciousness into the process, and to flow better with > the unconscious, to manifest what we choose. The principles I have > read about/listened to make sense and are in accordance with yogic > and/or Vedic teachings, and physics. > > I don't think there's an automatic connection between cash flow and > heart value. But you can choose to do whatever you want with your > affluence, whether it's money, or all the other wondrous things and > qualities the universe holds. Remember, as Ralph Waldo Emerson said: > Without a rich heart, wealth is an ugly beggar. > > > > > , "Eve__69" <eve__69@h...> > wrote: > > I see no connection between cash, flow and heart value, or value > in general, as one single rib has more value to a starving family of > six, than a whole truckload of cows to a fat rancher. Money is a > symbol. Nothing more. When spirituality is equated into money then > the person doing the equating is following money. It's pretty simple > really. No sadhu in the entire world is willing to sell God or > spirituality for fear of falling into the greatest mistake of karma, > and then having to figure it all out again. If money is your God > then say so. That goes for Sivababa, Maharishi, Chopra, and the > others who care more for cash in wallet than faith in God. It's > really pretty sick. > > - > > Mary Ann > > > > Monday, May 09, 2005 3:19 PM > > Re: Statues of Gurus > > > > > > For me, the common sense would be that if the principles work > for > > creating affluence, which isn't just about making money, but > about > > developing a state of awareness and being, then anyone can > utilize > > those principles and put the results of that into practice > however they > > see fit. > > > > , joanna pollner > > <joannapollner> wrote: > > > True teacher Guru > > > > > > A true teacher or Guru ( self realized master ) will never > collect > > > money for self inclined pleasures and comforts such is belief > in > > ancient India , there is a lot of scam artists charging > hundreds if > > not thousands opening the road to money flowing river of > nirvana , > > > that is not the purpose of True Self Realized Guru . > > > > > > Both Amma's Ammachi and Sri Karunamayi ask for donations to > help once > > in need , however they do not use the money for their own > comforts . > > Shirdi was also know to take money from devotees and instantly > passing > > > the money to someone in need. I am very weary of Chopras > million > > dollars homes and totally overpriced health spa's . If that is > > > being judgmental then where is common sense ? . > > > > > > regards, jp > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ ---- > ----------- > > Links > > > > > > / > > > > b.. > > > > > > c.. Terms > of Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - ----------- > Links > > > / > > b.. > > > c.. Terms of Service. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2005 Report Share Posted May 10, 2005 , "Mary Ann" <buttercookie61> wrote: > What I have read and heard in Deepak Chopra's teachings (and that's > the closest I've come to the Maharishi's teachings, other than the > high school experience I related earlier) is that money is an > energy, and as you say, a symbol, but not a stagnant thing. As such, > it is possible to enter the current (currency) of that symbol -- > which also correlates with electromagnetism, energy force/source, > etc. -- and manifest from the place we/God/dess manifest(s) from. Hi Mary, 2 q: a. what is the technique that is suggested to do the above manifestation? b. may I ask if you experienced that process, have you managed enter 'that' and create/manifest? or you quote from reading? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Hi: Deepak Chopra recommends listening to the recording of Creating Affluence on a daily basis (or reading the book, which I have found does contain a little more material). I think the most effective technique, or teaching, in addition to making connections between the Vedas, creativity, and physics, is that he advises NOT consciously focusing and trying and working hard, but rather, allowing the information and energy to begin its work in and upon you. This way, you can become more aware and able to recognize opportunities for manifestating when the opportunities present themselves, either from within, or in the world. A result I notice is that I'm making connections between creativity and money, not in a terrible, materialistic way, but in recognizing ways to more fully employ and utilize my gifts and abilities in the world to help people, creating "win-win" type situations. Amma says that there is true tragedy in wasting one's gifts, not learning to use them, something like that. I have definitely been stopped in my tracks by conflicts, fears, etc. in the past. I guess I'd also say that the information in Creating Affluence has helped me learn how not to stay stuck in dead ends, but to keep moving with that flow of creative energy, even when conflicts and fears do arise. , "kabbalist1" <kabbalist1> wrote: > , "Mary Ann" > <buttercookie61> wrote: > > What I have read and heard in Deepak Chopra's teachings (and that's > > the closest I've come to the Maharishi's teachings, other than the > > high school experience I related earlier) is that money is an > > energy, and as you say, a symbol, but not a stagnant thing. As > such, > > it is possible to enter the current (currency) of that symbol -- > > which also correlates with electromagnetism, energy force/source, > > etc. -- and manifest from the place we/God/dess manifest(s) from. > > Hi Mary, > 2 q: > a. what is the technique that is suggested to do the above > manifestation? > b. may I ask if you experienced that process, have you > managed enter 'that' and create/manifest? or you quote > from reading? > > > > <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.