Guest guest Posted June 3, 2005 Report Share Posted June 3, 2005 FRIDAY, JUNE 03, 2005: A Rajasthan Tourism guide recently released by state tourism minister Usha Punia seeks to advertise the state to tourists as "best known for sati matas". The guide exults that "there is not a spot in the state where women had not committed sati". In unambiguous terms, this state government publication has glorified an act that was declared a crime in 1829. This was reinforced by the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987, passed in the aftermath of the death of Roop Kanwar, a young widow, on the funeral pyre of her husband, in Deorala, Rajasthan, which states that "whoever does any act for the glorification of sati shall be punishable with imprisonment and with fine". Glorification includes, among other things, "the observance of any ceremony in connection with the sati". The least the state government can do now is to withdraw the publication. Some of these sati mata temples may indeed have some historic significance, and a few may be venerated by local people. As such, a closure of such sites may be impractical, and could even backfire, even though there is little evidence of scriptural sanction in the Indic traditions for sati. But the state is legally, and morally, bound to ensure that no social or political agency is allowed to endorse or exploit sati as a sacred and admirable act. The record of the Rajasthan government in handling such issues is deplorable. Despite women's groups demanding an appeal against a recent special court ruling that acquitted 11 persons charged with glorifying Roop Kanwar's death as sati, Vasundhara Raje's administration has maintained a stoic silence. Raje seems to fear that her political base will not approve of action against the orthodoxy that seeks to justify and glorify sati. It has been convincingly argued that sati, in most cases, is forced upon widows for reasons linked to inheritance and property rights. On the pretext of elevating the status of a dead woman to that of a goddess after committing sati, those who uphold the practice seek to establish a social order in which the only good widow is a dead widow. No government should directly or indirectly support such politics and propaganda. As for tourists, Rajasthan has heritage enough in the form of forts and folklore. SOURCE: The Times of India URL: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1130773.cms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.