Guest guest Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 ********Is that you and all your Kaulacharis get “real” mad at me and shower all kind of intolerable insults on me for upholding the value of Vedic scriptures and send me “tantric” curses and ghosts? **** Whoever said Vedic and tantric paths are exclusive of each other? I am not sure. It may have been so in the distant past. It no longer is and it is difficult to separate now. The practicing kulacharis do RESPECT Vedic systems. You see thus there are no “You Kulacharis” and “You Vedic”. OK? And also, no real kulacharis sends any curses OK? *****************Or will you my email address to some internet porn newsletter or send me some virus by email? I’ve had worse nuts to crack, thanks. I am not afraid of you. Am I aggressive and intolerant because I am defending the Vedic shastras? And you aren’t? Pleeeaase. **************** I do not think anybody in normal frame of mind would attack another system. Because the bible of Kulachara – Parashrama Kalpasootra says that one shall not insult any path. If a person is a true Kaula he will not do so. He may discuss an issue – even passionately but will no insult any path OK? ***************If this group mainly consists of people like you, I would really like to know. In this case, I will be only too happy to have the “good grace” not to post anything anymore and just , for your peace of mind. I have better things to do thank dealing with people like you. Good luck with your sadhana. *********** I think this Group has well delineated moderation line. We allow a certain freedm to express views as we believe in freedom. BUT THERE IS NO “OFFICIAL LINE” OK? We believe that there must be respect for every one and their point of view though we may disagree with this or that. Further the moderators will take their own pointe sof view - but that is as INDIVIDUAL members. Their statements are also not "OFFICIAL" positions OK? I hope I made myself clear. Parama Karuna Devi <paramakaruna wrote: No dear, I do not realize the implications. You tell me. Is that you and all your Kaulacharis get “real” mad at me and shower all kind of intolerable insults on me for upholding the value of Vedic scriptures and send me “tantric” curses and ghosts? Or will you my email address to some internet porn newsletter or send me some virus by email? I’ve had worse nuts to crack, thanks. I am not afraid of you. Am I aggressive and intolerant because I am defending the Vedic shastras? And you aren’t? Pleeeaase. If this group mainly consists of people like you, I would really like to know. In this case, I will be only too happy to have the “good grace” not to post anything anymore and just , for your peace of mind. I have better things to do thank dealing with people like you. Good luck with your sadhana. PKD On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 mahahradanatha wrote : >It is not only the topics it is the Flooding and your fundamentalist >orthodox, intolerant, aggressive, smarta brahmin viewpoint. Are you >realising that you are posting in a group that mainly consist of people >who actually follow or are interested in Kaulachara? Do you realise >the implications? >> I understand that not everybody will be interested in such topics, so >I am not expecting everybody to read everything (or at least >immediately). >> >> But I am kindly requesting people to want to discuss about the >particular topics on which I have supplied evidence, to go through them >before attacking my propositions as unfounded. >> >> PKD >> >> >> >> > Links > >/ > > > > > > >Your use of is subject to the > Terms of Service >. > / Discover Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 With a defender like you the vedic shastras need no enemies. I was just wondering if your posts fit in the general charcter of this group which is about Shakti Sadhana with emphasis on Kaula. While you general interest seems to be vedic fundamentalism with a fascist ideologic background. I only suggested that you may look fo another more fitting Hindutva group that will applaude your posts. , "Parama Karuna Devi" <paramakaruna@r...> wrote: > No dear, I do not realize the implications. You tell me. > Is that you and all your Kaulacharis get "real" mad at me and shower all kind of intolerable insults on me for upholding the value of Vedic scriptures and send me "tantric" curses and ghosts? > Or will you my email address to some internet porn newsletter or send me some virus by email? > I've had worse nuts to crack, thanks. I am not afraid of you. > Am I aggressive and intolerant because I am defending the Vedic shastras? > And you aren't? > Pleeeaase. > > If this group mainly consists of people like you, I would really like to know. > In this case, I will be only too happy to have the "good grace" not to post anything anymore and just , for your peace of mind. I have better things to do thank dealing with people like you. > Good luck with your sadhana. > > PKD > > > > On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 mahahradanatha wrote : > >It is not only the topics it is the Flooding and your fundamentalist > >orthodox, intolerant, aggressive, smarta brahmin viewpoint. Are you > >realising that you are posting in a group that mainly consist of people > >who actually follow or are interested in Kaulachara? Do you realise > >the implications? > >> I understand that not everybody will be interested in such topics, so > >I am not expecting everybody to read everything (or at least > >immediately). > >> > >> But I am kindly requesting people to want to discuss about the > >particular topics on which I have supplied evidence, to go through them > >before attacking my propositions as unfounded. > >> > >> PKD > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Links > > > >/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Your use of is subject to the > > Terms of Service > >. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 ....kaulinee kula yoginee... ..........akulaa samyanthasthaa samayaachara tatparaa........... So says LS. So SHE is EVERYHING; kula; kaula; vaideeka and paishachika or whatever. so every subject is OK because all are in her and she is in them. Thank you mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha wrote: With a defender like you the vedic shastras need no enemies. I was just wondering if your posts fit in the general charcter of this group which is about Shakti Sadhana with emphasis on Kaula. While you general interest seems to be vedic fundamentalism with a fascist ideologic background. I only suggested that you may look fo another more fitting Hindutva group that will applaude your posts. , "Parama Karuna Devi" <paramakaruna@r...> wrote: > No dear, I do not realize the implications. You tell me. > Is that you and all your Kaulacharis get "real" mad at me and shower all kind of intolerable insults on me for upholding the value of Vedic scriptures and send me "tantric" curses and ghosts? > Or will you my email address to some internet porn newsletter or send me some virus by email? > I've had worse nuts to crack, thanks. I am not afraid of you. > Am I aggressive and intolerant because I am defending the Vedic shastras? > And you aren't? > Pleeeaase. > > If this group mainly consists of people like you, I would really like to know. > In this case, I will be only too happy to have the "good grace" not to post anything anymore and just , for your peace of mind. I have better things to do thank dealing with people like you. > Good luck with your sadhana. > > PKD > > > > On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 mahahradanatha wrote : > >It is not only the topics it is the Flooding and your fundamentalist > >orthodox, intolerant, aggressive, smarta brahmin viewpoint. Are you > >realising that you are posting in a group that mainly consist of people > >who actually follow or are interested in Kaulachara? Do you realise > >the implications? > >> I understand that not everybody will be interested in such topics, so > >I am not expecting everybody to read everything (or at least > >immediately). > >> > >> But I am kindly requesting people to want to discuss about the > >particular topics on which I have supplied evidence, to go through them > >before attacking my propositions as unfounded. > >> > >> PKD > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Links > > > >/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Your use of is subject to the > > Terms of Service > >. > > > > > / Discover Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 ....kaulinee kula yoginee... ..........akulaa samyanthasthaa samayaachara tatparaa........... So says LS. So SHE is EVERYHING; kula; kaula; vaideeka and paishachika or whatever. so every subject is OK because all are in her and she is in them. Thank you mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha wrote: With a defender like you the vedic shastras need no enemies. I was just wondering if your posts fit in the general charcter of this group which is about Shakti Sadhana with emphasis on Kaula. While you general interest seems to be vedic fundamentalism with a fascist ideologic background. I only suggested that you may look fo another more fitting Hindutva group that will applaude your posts. , "Parama Karuna Devi" <paramakaruna@r...> wrote: > No dear, I do not realize the implications. You tell me. > Is that you and all your Kaulacharis get "real" mad at me and shower all kind of intolerable insults on me for upholding the value of Vedic scriptures and send me "tantric" curses and ghosts? > Or will you my email address to some internet porn newsletter or send me some virus by email? > I've had worse nuts to crack, thanks. I am not afraid of you. > Am I aggressive and intolerant because I am defending the Vedic shastras? > And you aren't? > Pleeeaase. > > If this group mainly consists of people like you, I would really like to know. > In this case, I will be only too happy to have the "good grace" not to post anything anymore and just , for your peace of mind. I have better things to do thank dealing with people like you. > Good luck with your sadhana. > > PKD > > > > On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 mahahradanatha wrote : > >It is not only the topics it is the Flooding and your fundamentalist > >orthodox, intolerant, aggressive, smarta brahmin viewpoint. Are you > >realising that you are posting in a group that mainly consist of people > >who actually follow or are interested in Kaulachara? Do you realise > >the implications? > >> I understand that not everybody will be interested in such topics, so > >I am not expecting everybody to read everything (or at least > >immediately). > >> > >> But I am kindly requesting people to want to discuss about the > >particular topics on which I have supplied evidence, to go through them > >before attacking my propositions as unfounded. > >> > >> PKD > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Links > > > >/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Your use of is subject to the > > Terms of Service > >. > > > > > / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 Yes of course, nothing is true and everything permitted and maybe my impression was wrong that she was slightly of topic and repetitive. But she received a lot of critic (not so much from me so i don´t know why she got so enraged but i seem to attract rage) most of the posters like Erin, Max Dashu, Len and Mary Ann , meant well and tried to help her improve her book. Others tried to help her and teach her how to avoid flooding the mailboxes by suggesting to her the use of the file section instead, to prevent flooding. But she did not listen to anybody. I had the impressions that she is more interested to be applauded, and that she seemend very unhappy with all the critic and wasn´t at all thankful for the help she received (which involved considerable writing and research efforts and patience on the part of some of the commentators) instead she started getting more and more defensive and aggresive. Thats why i suggested to her to maybe look for another groups which would be more happy to read that sort of articles she tends to mass- produce. Now she took my advice to heart and left the group and i hope she is posting now in a more friendly and like minded atmosphere and is happier than before. , sankara menon <kochu1tz> wrote: > > ...kaulinee kula yoginee... > > .........akulaa samyanthasthaa samayaachara tatparaa........... > > So says LS. So SHE is EVERYHING; kula; kaula; vaideeka and paishachika or whatever. so every subject is OK because all are in her and she is in them. > > Thank you > mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha> wrote: > With a defender like you the vedic shastras need no enemies. > > I was just wondering if your posts fit in the general charcter of this group which is about Shakti Sadhana with emphasis on Kaula. > While you general interest seems to be vedic fundamentalism with a fascist ideologic background. > > I only suggested that you may look fo another more fitting Hindutva group that will applaude your posts. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.