Guest guest Posted June 17, 2005 Report Share Posted June 17, 2005 93 This is wrong according to Tantras and according to proper common sense. Attraction to opposite sex should not be overcome, there is no need and moreover if U do so U degrade urself. Tantras teach that Passion and Love are essential for spiritual life. Human should not become passionless like stone . na virAgAt paraM pApam - there is no greater sin than lack of passion Chandamaharoshana-tantra Love is the law, love under will. A. , vikram vanam <vikram_vanam2005> wrote: > HI To All > > From reading the mails on this topic, i observe We have forgotten the goal of using tantric > > means to propiate the Divinity > > It is to overcome our basic instinct to feel attracted towards the opposite sex ( and not the > > same sex) and regard the opposite sex as the divinity personified Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2005 Report Share Posted June 18, 2005 Arjuna wrote: "This is wrong according to Tantras and according to proper common sense. Attraction to opposite sex should not be overcome, there is no need and moreover if U do so U degrade urself. Tantras teach that Passion and Love are essential for spiritual life. Human should not become passionless like stone . na virAgAt paraM pApam - there is no greater sin than lack of passion Chandamaharoshana-tantra" I agree wholeheartdely! And apparently also Taoism as Jolan Chang write in his book The Tao of Love and Sex: "A taoist usually cherish an endless love to universe and all living. Every form of destruction or annhilation is to the taoist an evil which must be prevented .... (taoism) does not demand that we must give up earthly or heavenly pleasures .... neither a denial of desire - as the need of beatuy in form of sound, smell, taste, touch and sex - which almost all schools of buddhism do. Instead Taoism advice us to enjoy fully earthly and heavenly pleasures ... these are united in the ecstacy by a taoist as he then is united with universe - his expression of God." These words picture my religon of life. Regards Lars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 Hi, IMHO the point of all sadhana/tantra/mantra etc is to take us to a stage where gold or stone mean the same. Somewhere along the line while going towards this state, we'll probably pass a state where passions no longer control us instead we'll do something bcos we have to do it and be dispassionate abt it be it relationship with the opp sex,money,whatever. regds --- Lars Hedström <lars wrote: Arjuna wrote: "This is wrong according to Tantras and according to proper common sense. Attraction to opposite sex should not be overcome, there is no need and moreover if U do so U degrade urself. Tantras teach that Passion and Love are essential for spiritual life. Human should not become passionless like stone . na virAgAt paraM pApam - there is no greater sin than lack of passion Chandamaharoshana-tantra" I agree wholeheartdely! And apparently also Taoism as Jolan Chang write in his book The Tao of Love and Sex: "A taoist usually cherish an endless love to universe and all living. Every form of destruction or annhilation is to the taoist an evil which must be prevented ... (taoism) does not demand that we must give up earthly or heavenly pleasures ... neither a denial of desire - as the need of beatuy in form of sound, smell, taste, touch and sex - which almost all schools of buddhism do. Instead Taoism advice us to enjoy fully earthly and heavenly pleasures ... these are united in the ecstacy by a taoist as he then is united with universe - his expression of God." These words picture my religon of life. Regards Lars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.