Guest guest Posted July 26, 2005 Report Share Posted July 26, 2005 I like what Isabella had to say. Yes, the True Gnosis may be so unknown that it would be a brand new concept for all of us, and it could be a doctrine quite alien from our 3-dimensional naivete. "Being uncomfortable" with the Revealed Truth, is very dangerous - both for the ignorant, who have the timid taboo and the transferral of cowardly fear and guilt onto the open-minded Gnostic messenger. "You strain at flies and swallow camels". In order to maintain orthodox conservative interpretations, you martyr the saints and doom your children to wrong "knowledge" (which is ignorance) and the unnecessary suffering that follows such willful error. - Dr. J. GospelofThomas, Isabella <isabellariley> wrote: > > > --- David Arbuckle <ossobuccoman> wrote: > > > gnostic hands is the key word jef. > > > > They were the last to have it and probably they are > > just as guilty as the orthodox are (in NT) in making > > redactions. > > Great, I'm glad you came to this conclusion based on > the little research you have done - I suggest that > Thomas was gnostic, I suggest that Mary was gnostic. > "The last to have it" approach fails miserably, do > your homework, find out how ideas evolve, in other > words, stop saying that ideas just fall out of the sky > out of nowhere and hijack others. There is way more > proof that these ideas come from us, which means they > are always present and ready to emerge, and they arise > from time to time stemming from someone that is not > liked, that stirs up trouble, that goes around telling > people what does *not* feel comfortable since it's > different than what they were used to hearing - > someone exactly like Jesus. > > Isabella > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.