Guest guest Posted July 28, 2005 Report Share Posted July 28, 2005 This is a brief, very insightful, beautifully written passage on the different ways in which Hindu and Buddhist worldviews condition their adherents to face life's problems. It's from the novel "Desirable Daughters" (2002) by Bharati Mukherjee, a Bengali Brahmin (now in her 60's, I think) who has lived in the U.S. and Canada since her grad-school days. Very good book, by the way, if you're looking for something different to read: HINDUISM AND BUDDHISM For Hindus, the world is constructed of calamities. The stories are wondrous, lurid and beautiful, full of shape-changing, gender- bending, grand-scale slaughter, polymorphous sexuality. Miss a ritual and a snake will invade your wedding. The gods destroy and remake the world every four billion years. When the stories are rendered as paintings, they inspire great flights of fancy and color. My mother told me hundreds of stories from the puranas and the Mahabharata – even girls from the upper classes going to English- language Catholic schools got the classic exposure. In school, we listened politely at what passed for miracles in the Old and New Testaments, but in a village setting they would hardly have raised an eyebrow. In the more austere schools of Buddhism, by contrast, the stories are plain and every day. "Traveler Po came across a fork in the road ... Farmer Jiang had three beautiful daughters ... Pears from Farmer Wu's fields were considered the sweetest in all China." Japanese and Chinese paintings came to life. They were not the hot, phosphorescent colors of India, but the cool, black-and-white stick drawings of winter trees against the winter clouds, white geese flying across a gray mountain range in the snow. .... All the lures of the world – beauty, wealth, ambition, desire – are not tests to be overcome, like the Hindu sadhus, or urges to be suppressed, like the Christian saints. They are simply aspects of creation to be ignored. When you are armed with Hindu stories, every earthly tragedy is a shadow of something greater, from a previous time. Consolation comes from comparison. One could call it "suck-it-up Hinduism." Modern calamities, losses, and disappointments that seem inconsolable are minor indeed compared to the suffering of giants on battlefields in the immemorial past. We took our comfort, or moral instruction, from the glory and folly of the gods. Had a hard day at the office? Bad test scores? Well, at least you didn't get decapitated and have to go through life with an elephant's head replacement. For the Buddhists, suffering is not the echo of some far greater terror, but a continuation of something no different. Something no greater than the tides, the wilting of flowers, the dying of leaves. Consolation follows from continuity. The death of your love is no larger than the problem of Grandmother Shui-Ying, who lost the proper thread to sew her husband's button. While she looked and looked for the right color and just the right strength of silk, her husband died of the cold. ********** I'd be interested to hear your opinions on this passage. For what it's worth, my impression is that her description of Hinduism is sensitive and accurate and true; but also that Hinduism doesn't necessarily exclude the approaches she attributes to Buddhism. It is undeniable that Buddhism is, in many ways, a simplification of Hinduism. But I think simplification is one of the broad movements of this Group as well, i which some of the more accomplished Srividya upasaks among us seem to really be aiming at a simplification of the Shakta Tantra. aim mAtangyai namaH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.