Guest guest Posted August 21, 2005 Report Share Posted August 21, 2005 Amritanandamayi unhurt in attack Last Updated: August 22, 2005 00:10 IST A man tried to attack Mata Amritanandamayi, one of India's best- known spiritual figures, on Sunday evening, but was overpowered by her disciples. The incident occurred during a prayer and bhajan event at the Mata's Vallikkav Ashram in Kerala's Kollam district. Police officers have taken custody of the attacker and say Amritanandamayi is unhurt and safe. [....] "The attack on our Amma has been foiled. Amma is safe and sound. And she has forgiven the man who tried to attack her," [said an associate.] [....] Full article: http://us.rediff.com/news/2005/aug/21mata.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2005 Report Share Posted August 21, 2005 do u notice the complete lack of details of the attacker? In India this can mean only one thing. It is when the perpetrator/s belong to Muslim community that one avoids details. Then there will either be no mention of community or they will say something else. Hope that is not so. msbauju <msbauju wrote: Amritanandamayi unhurt in attack Last Updated: August 22, 2005 00:10 IST A man tried to attack Mata Amritanandamayi, one of India's best- known spiritual figures, on Sunday evening, but was overpowered by her disciples. The incident occurred during a prayer and bhajan event at the Mata's Vallikkav Ashram in Kerala's Kollam district. Police officers have taken custody of the attacker and say Amritanandamayi is unhurt and safe. [....] "The attack on our Amma has been foiled. Amma is safe and sound. And she has forgiven the man who tried to attack her," [said an associate.] [....] Full article: http://us.rediff.com/news/2005/aug/21mata.htm Beliefs of hinduism Independence day Traditions Divine Hinduism Visit your group "" on the web. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2005 Report Share Posted August 21, 2005 , sankara menon <kochu1tz> wrote: > do u notice the complete lack of details of the attacker? In India this can mean only one thing. It is when the perpetrator/s belong to Muslim community that one avoids details. Then there will either be no mention of community or they will say something else. Hope that is not so. This is bound to happen right? It is much easier to advocate hate and war then peace. She is definitely the target for those who dosent like peace, love and compassion. People who dont like to see others live in harmony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2005 Report Share Posted August 21, 2005 Further update http://www.hindu.com/2005/08/22/stories/2005082206731200.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2005 Report Share Posted August 21, 2005 Maybe the attacker was/is mentally ill; that appears to be the theory of the associate of Mata Amritanandamayi who was interviewed in the article. I had trimmed out many of the article details for brevity: [....] The police said the attacker, whose name is reported to be Pavithran, has been staying at the Ashram for some days. Hailing from Idukki district in Kerala, the attacker sat among the followers praying and singing in front of Amritanadamayi who was seated on the dais. Suddenly, he jumped up and rushed to Amritanandamayi with a knife. But before he could reach her, a group of disciples around Amritanandamayi overpowered him. [....] [The spokesperson] felt the person who tried to attack Amritanandamayi was of "unstable mind." [....] http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/aug/21mata.htm , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> wrote: > > This is bound to happen right? > It is much easier to advocate hate and > war then peace. She is definitely the > target for those who dosent like > peace, love and compassion. > People who don't like to see others live in > harmony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2005 Report Share Posted August 22, 2005 msbauju" [....] [The spokesperson] felt the person who tried to attack Amritanandamayi was of "unstable mind." [....] Interesting terminology used by persons who is not a medical personnel. Somebody who is of "unstable" mind is actually more stable then those who are not. Asked those who have worked in a mental institute and they will tell you. Anyway I am happy Amma is alright. Lets pray for her safety and well being. Nothing is more powerful than the protective shield of love and care we put forth for her so that she can continue to shower her continous compassion to us all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2005 Report Share Posted August 22, 2005 My goodness; the news is full of this now: Mata attacker `mentally unstable' Posted online: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 at 0000 hours IST KOCHI, AUGUST 22: The man who knifed two volunteers before he was overpowered just a few feet away from spiritual leader Mata Amritanandamayi last evening had a history of mental illness, police sources said today. This morning, Mata Amritanandamayi made a public statement, asking that the man be pardoned and let off. But the police produced him in court which remanded him in judicial custody for 14 days. The math functionaries appeared jolted by the abortive attack. Swami Amritakripanandapuri, the Math trust's vice-chief, insisted that the incident can't be robbed of its seriousness merely on the insanity plea. The attacker, 47-year-old Pavithran, a rubber tapper in Idukki, had been under psychiatric medication for years, and had a police record too. He was arrested for stabbing a neighbour in 1985, but was acquitted. Pavithran had been frequenting the Mata's ashram for many months now and had been turned away last week, math sources said. Amritakripanandapuri, however, maintained that no senior math functionary could recall seeing Pavithran in the premises earlier. The cops don't want to take chances, but have now run into a deadend. ``We want to work on comprehensive security for her, including metal detectors and frisking of all devotees. But that can be only if the math agrees,'' a senior officer said. Mata Amritanandamayi, however, openly dismissed suggestions for stepping up security in the ashram. ``There is no need to increase security for me just because of yesterday's incident. I don't want that,'' she said in a televised statement. As things stand, there is hardly any security cover for her, except a few unarmed cops in the premises. Math sources pointed out that the main ashram in Vallikkavu and its many satellite centres elsewhere have thousands of visitors streaming in, and the Mata personally hugs and blesses each one of them, right through the day till late night. ``It is vital that we make sure she is safe. We hope the police would be able to persuade her at a meeting slated for tomorrow,'' they said. http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=76777 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2005 Report Share Posted August 22, 2005 msbauju wrote: The attacker, 47-year-old Pavithran, a rubber tapper in Idukki, had been under psychiatric medication for years, and had a police record too. He was arrested for stabbing a neighbour in 1985, but was acquitted. Pavithran had been frequenting the Mata's ashram for many months now and had been turned away last week, math sources said. Yeah Ive been thinking about this incident too. Some questions keep on poping in my head : Why would a Mother turn away her child who is in need? Would this incident gives the people around her especially her lieutants to be more protective of her, thus making it more difficult for other to get access to her. Ive watch when Amma visits malaysia, how they circle around her, pushing others harshly when they tried to be near her. Just when we thought ah! this is a good organisation. A noble organisation, suddenly something like this happen, it makes us think for a moment, dont you agree? Ive been a volunteer in a children home for several years now. A so called role model home. The place well maintain and well organize. The funds that are coming in are promising. They have a successful chinese businesswoman as the Chairman of the fund committee. And then suddenly something happen triggered by a "mentally immature child-woman" so they say, the Fund Chairman found out that she is being lied to. Not only her but the whole commitee is being lied to by the Chairman and the Administrator. What happen? When they dig further, they found out that funds : cash and kind are being secretly diverted out of the home. Is this the tip of the iceberg? Perhaps Devi is trying to tell us something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> wrote: > Why would a Mother turn away her child who is in need? There is some contradicting info here vis-a-vis Pavithran, and that needs to be sorted out before one can assume that he was indeed a regular visitor. At ny rate, people are often turned away when they break some of the rules that sustain the organization; I think everyone understands that. It is reasonable to assume that the same happened here and not something fishy, UNLESS we already know something is fishy. > Ive watch when Amma visits malaysia, how they circle around her, > pushing others harshly when they tried to be near her. Just when > we thought ah! this is a good organisation. A noble organisation, > suddenly something like this happen, it makes us think for a > moment, dont you agree? Is this the tip of the iceberg? Perhaps > Devi is trying to tell us something? Not sure how many in the list is aware, but as an introduction, let me mention that Amma goes around the world giving them blessings in the form of hugging individually. In India and Malayasia, crowds of 20k+ people have been blessed like that 1 night (in a sitting of non- stop 18 - 24 hours). Coming back to your comment, the issue is not one of lack of love; it's a lack of time. These people are given the task of "moving" the line of 20,000 + people efficiently. How do you achieve it? And I know from close observation, that Amma is constantly berating them for lack of attention at the job, in an attempt to make these people completely one-pointed in any job they undertake. what wonderful training! Just imagine the stress of being shouted at in front of atleast 50-100 people throughout the night..... Amma is very impersonal when she is shouting at the volunteers to improve (Guru Bhava - the mood of the Guru), the very next moment she is very loving to the next person in line (Matru/Devi Bhava - the mood of the mother). She is amazingly flexible and snaps in an out of each mood in record time. It is not insincerity but rather it is the mark of a Supreme Saakshi Bhava (witness mood where the emotions on her countenance are but a reflection of the thoughts of the person/item her attention focusses on for the moment). Point is, it is difficult to be sweety-sweety when one has to manage such large crowds in such short time. What matters to them is that they are able to get everybody to obtain Amma's blessings, not make smiley and sweety gestures and polite requests ..... Such actions can't be the basis for determining if an org is good or not. Hope this has helped all somewhat in knowing more about Amma; atleast that was the intention. Jai Ma! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 HI Can you please tell some thing ....... during tsunami, when the tides came up to the ashram of mata amritanandamayi, why did she not warn everyone before in advance then lives would have been saved near the seashore cannot the destiny be wiped off if the saint was the divine mother itself I am not doubting her supreme devotion/compassion but this thought comes in my mind regards vikram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 manoj_menon wrote: Point is, it is difficult to be sweety-sweety when one has to manage such large crowds in such short time. What matters to them is that they are able to get everybody to obtain Amma's blessings, not make smiley and sweety gestures and polite requests ..... Such actions can't be the basis for determining if an org is good or not. But it does. It does gives you the idea of the attitute of the whole organisation on the whole. Sometimes you never see the true nature of a person until they are given a situation. You observe from within, I observe from without. Sitting there on the outside and just observe the actions of every one, and this is what I see. Sorry if my observation seems unpleasant to some. I do what my instincts tells me. I am not here to say that Amma org. is bad that was never my intention. I know SHE have done great things to many people. Have bring comfort and love to thousand. My comments is that sometime things happen to make us to reflect back at our actions. Make corrections and improve the defects. Many like to be praise, nobody likes to be criticise. But sometimes criticisism is good, because it makes us to really look at ourselves and finds ways of how we can improve so that we can better serve the whole humanity at large. There are some fruits, smells nice and taste nice but only up to a certain layer, thereafter once you cut further, what you see are worms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 Amma's swamis and other helping peoples are not Amma herself; I feel this is important to note. I don't think it can be guaranteed that Amma is aware of how exactly things are conveyed by her helpers, or how the information is coming across to those who are there to see her. For example, in 2003, when I first went to see Amma, I got a major leg cramp while watching Amma give darshan. I asked if there were any bodyworkers there to help me. "No, Amma is against that!" Last year and this year, they were calling for bodyworkers and massage therapists to donate their skills for the attendees in order to generate donations, and for the helpers (who were under stress during the tour). This year, I was put in charge of sharing informational sheets about mantras, to hand them out to people in the darshan line. In 2003, I found a pamphlet lying on a table and decided to request a mantra. So I mentioned it to one of the helpers: "You know, it could also be helpful to have some of these sheets available on one or some of the tables in the back." "No! Amma has said that this is how she wants it!" Hm, really? Maybe, but again, I'm not so sure it was meant as the dogma it is conveyed as by the "helper." I've also on more than one occasion gone up to swamis and asked for assistance, only to be "hit" with major egoism and/or rebuff. Oh, well! That hasn't stopped me from moving forward and allowing Amma to enrich my life because that is not Amma. , "manoj_menon" <ammasmon@s...> wrote: > , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> > wrote: > > Why would a Mother turn away her child who is in need? > > There is some contradicting info here vis-a-vis Pavithran, and that > needs to be sorted out before one can assume that he was indeed a > regular visitor. At ny rate, people are often turned away when they > break some of the rules that sustain the organization; I think > everyone understands that. It is reasonable to assume that the same > happened here and not something fishy, UNLESS we already know > something is fishy. > > > Ive watch when Amma visits malaysia, how they circle around her, > > pushing others harshly when they tried to be near her. Just when > > we thought ah! this is a good organisation. A noble organisation, > > suddenly something like this happen, it makes us think for a > > moment, dont you agree? Is this the tip of the iceberg? Perhaps > > Devi is trying to tell us something? > > Not sure how many in the list is aware, but as an introduction, let > me mention that Amma goes around the world giving them blessings in > the form of hugging individually. In India and Malayasia, crowds of > 20k+ people have been blessed like that 1 night (in a sitting of non- > stop 18 - 24 hours). > > Coming back to your comment, the issue is not one of lack of love; > it's a lack of time. These people are given the task of "moving" the > line of 20,000 + people efficiently. How do you achieve it? And I > know from close observation, that Amma is constantly berating them > for lack of attention at the job, in an attempt to make these people > completely one-pointed in any job they undertake. what wonderful > training! Just imagine the stress of being shouted at in front of > atleast 50-100 people throughout the night..... > > Amma is very impersonal when she is shouting at the volunteers to > improve (Guru Bhava - the mood of the Guru), the very next moment > she is very loving to the next person in line (Matru/Devi Bhava - > the mood of the mother). She is amazingly flexible and snaps in an > out of each mood in record time. It is not insincerity but rather it > is the mark of a Supreme Saakshi Bhava (witness mood where the > emotions on her countenance are but a reflection of the thoughts of > the person/item her attention focusses on for the moment). > > Point is, it is difficult to be sweety-sweety when one has to manage > such large crowds in such short time. What matters to them is that > they are able to get everybody to obtain Amma's blessings, not make > smiley and sweety gestures and polite requests ..... Such actions > can't be the basis for determining if an org is good or not. > > Hope this has helped all somewhat in knowing more about Amma; > atleast that was the intention. > > Jai Ma! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 And why didn't Jesus just not let the crucifixion happen? Who knows the answer? Maybe some of the fundies can help us out :-P , vikram vanam <vikram_vanam2005> wrote: > HI > > Can you please tell some thing ....... > > during tsunami, when the tides came up to the ashram of mata amritanandamayi, why did she not warn everyone before in advance then lives would have been saved near the seashore > > cannot the destiny be wiped off if the saint was the divine mother itself > > I am not doubting her supreme devotion/compassion but this thought comes in my mind > > regards > vikram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 Mary Ann wrote:And why didn't Jesus just not let the crucifixion happen? Who knows the answer? Maybe some of the fundies can help us out :-P Im being told, Jesus knows that he will be crucifix and as such do nothing to run from it, because that is the only way to save humanity, so they say! Hey! im not a fundies, but only a funder sometimes, that if I have the money, otherwise im just a funky old fool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 So, allowing the tragedy furthers the cause of the salvation of humanity. What a great explanation Thank you Ms. FOF (Funky Old Fool) LOL ! , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> wrote: > Mary Ann wrote:And why didn't Jesus just not let the crucifixion > happen? Who knows the answer? Maybe some of the fundies can help us > out :-P > > > Im being told, Jesus knows that he will be crucifix and as such do > nothing to run from it, because that is the only way to save > humanity, so they say! > > Hey! im not a fundies, but only a funder sometimes, that if I have the > money, otherwise im just a funky old fool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 I was thinking about this the other day in terms of Gurumayi, who told a story of being on her way to one of her meetings with the public. A woman came up to her on the road begging for help. Gurumayi told the woman she could not help her, and left for her meeting, for which she was on time, thank goodness! Her message was that there were hundreds awaiting her, and she could not stop for that one. This really seems to contradict a divine message. What would a few minutes have been, ultimately? Or, even to bring that woman to the meeting so she could be enriched by the teachings there, if not in a one-on-one at an inopportune moment. But that was the decision Gurumayi made that day in that moment, and she shared it, for all to make of it what they will. , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> wrote: > manoj_menon wrote: Point is, it is difficult to be sweety-sweety > when > one has to manage such large crowds in such short time. What matters > to them is that they are able to get everybody to obtain Amma's > blessings, not make smiley and sweety gestures and polite > requests ..... Such actions can't be the basis for determining if an > org is good or not. > > > But it does. It does gives you the idea of the attitute of the whole > organisation on the whole. Sometimes you never see the true nature > of a person until they are given a situation. You observe from > within, I observe from without. Sitting there on the outside and > just observe the actions of every one, and this is what I see. Sorry > if my observation seems unpleasant to some. I do what my instincts > tells me. > > I am not here to say that Amma org. is bad that was never my > intention. I know SHE have done great things to many people. Have > bring comfort and love to thousand. My comments is that sometime > things happen to make us to reflect back at our actions. Make > corrections and improve the defects. Many like to be praise, nobody > likes to be criticise. But sometimes criticisism is good, because it > makes us to really look at ourselves and finds ways of how we can > improve so that we can better serve the whole humanity at large. > > There are some fruits, smells nice and taste nice but only up to a > certain layer, thereafter once you cut further, what you see are > worms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 but we must also remember from the life of Sri Ramakrishna paramahamsa that he said to one of his disciples that he had come down as Jesus christ and he also had come down as Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu Although I appreciate that to consider one guru as near to jesus christ is good for progress but so far I dare say that the christians have not deciphered the bible as the hindu mystics have done and as Sri ramakrishna said that when such incarnations of God come they take back people more in number ie liberation than the self advanced saints and he also said that the saints are like bees taking nectar from different sources while the incarnations come for special mission I attended one of the lectures by mata amritanandamayi where she said that suffering can be relieved by offering worship to planets If I worship the divine mother I need not worship even the Trinity gods ( as quoted from soundaryalahiri) who preside over the planets So I dont believe if holy people convey to there followers to worship the planets regards vikram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 , vikram vanam <vikram_vanam2005> wrote: > HI > > Can you please tell some thing ....... > > during tsunami, when the tides came up to the ashram of mata amritanandamayi, why did she not warn everyone before in advance then lives would have been saved near the seashore > > cannot the destiny be wiped off if the saint was the divine mother itself > > I am not doubting her supreme devotion/compassion but this thought comes in my mind > > regards > vikram There can be no single answer that will satisfy everybody. So none will be offered. . It is really upto you to solve the question for yourself. faith may prove to be the key. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> wrote: > But it does. It does gives you the idea of the attitute of the whole > organisation on the whole. Sometimes you never see the true nature > of a person until they are given a situation. You observe from > within, I observe from without. Sitting there on the outside and > just observe the actions of every one, and this is what I see. Sorry > if my observation seems unpleasant to some. I do what my instincts > tells me. > I never tire of telling this to people. As Mary Ann also said, don't mistake Amma and her follwers as one. Don't mistake the actions of her followers as representative of the org, simply because they are also bumbling on their path as we all are. Most are imperfect and for the most part, working hard to be deserving, and are glad that Amma is there. if you insist on judging representatives, then I would very tentatively suggest that you look up to the orange-robed swamis and swaminis; they are the real fruits of Amma's labor. And without any questions, look at Amma herself. > There are some fruits, smells nice and taste nice but only up to a > certain layer, thereafter once you cut further, what you see are > worms. Exactly. but these worms are no different than the ones we all have. all of us imperfect folks who are hoping to get perfect. they are no different than us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 Sorry. Hope I am not interfering. U see it is my opinion that we should not judge ppl or organisations like this. There is a good and bad side to most people. Our attempt should be to see the good side and ignore the bad side. Further who are we to judge. Every one except ppl like Amma have their karmas to work out. Let me make it clear I am not a devotee of Amma but I do admire her and do visit her whenever I am in India. I have seen the egotistical side of some ppl there. But how am I concerned with their egos? I have not gone there to see them!! I have gone there to see Amma. If there is any problem i just retreat without comments. But then i have not had many problems. IMHO There is no need to criticize and if criticized no one need defend too. manoj_menon <ammasmon wrote: , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> wrote: > But it does. It does gives you the idea of the attitute of the whole > organisation on the whole. Sometimes you never see the true nature > of a person until they are given a situation. You observe from > within, I observe from without. Sitting there on the outside and > just observe the actions of every one, and this is what I see. Sorry > if my observation seems unpleasant to some. I do what my instincts > tells me. > I never tire of telling this to people. As Mary Ann also said, don't mistake Amma and her follwers as one. Don't mistake the actions of her followers as representative of the org, simply because they are also bumbling on their path as we all are. Most are imperfect and for the most part, working hard to be deserving, and are glad that Amma is there. if you insist on judging representatives, then I would very tentatively suggest that you look up to the orange-robed swamis and swaminis; they are the real fruits of Amma's labor. And without any questions, look at Amma herself. > There are some fruits, smells nice and taste nice but only up to a > certain layer, thereafter once you cut further, what you see are > worms. Exactly. but these worms are no different than the ones we all have. all of us imperfect folks who are hoping to get perfect. they are no different than us. Visit your group "" on the web. Start your day with - make it your home page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 Than you Manoj. I fully agree. There is no need for us to discuss the actions of great people. As far as I know no saint ever interferes with communal karma except in very very rare cases. And individual karmas are cleared on a case by case basis depending on various factors. However we cannot see or understand the basis of such actions that are only understood by the enlightened. It is only fools who ask questions like why don't saints alleviate all povert? all disease etc. We, including the saints are governed by laws and they understand and follow them we neither understand nor are we capable of following so we are bound and forced to follow that which we do not understand. Sorry if I offend any one. i have no intention to offend any one. manoj_menon <ammasmon wrote: , vikram vanam <vikram_vanam2005> wrote: > HI > > Can you please tell some thing ....... > > during tsunami, when the tides came up to the ashram of mata amritanandamayi, why did she not warn everyone before in advance then lives would have been saved near the seashore > > cannot the destiny be wiped off if the saint was the divine mother itself > > I am not doubting her supreme devotion/compassion but this thought comes in my mind > > regards > vikram There can be no single answer that will satisfy everybody. So none will be offered. . It is really upto you to solve the question for yourself. faith may prove to be the key. Beliefs of hinduism Independence day Traditions Divine Hinduism Visit your group "" on the web. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 Actually I was kind of joking in what I said, mentioning Jesus, etc. I was thinking about it later. Why does God allow volcanic eruptions that decimate villages? Why earthquakes that kill thousands, etc. etc. etc. It's not an answerable question, and that's why I was offering it to the Xtian Fundamentalists who always have the most sensible answers , vikram vanam <vikram_vanam2005> wrote: > but we must also remember from the life of Sri Ramakrishna paramahamsa that he said to one of his disciples that he had come down as Jesus christ and he also had come down as Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu > > Although I appreciate that to consider one guru as near to jesus christ is good for progress but so far I dare say that the christians have not deciphered the bible as the hindu mystics have done and as Sri ramakrishna said that when such incarnations of God come they take back people more in number ie liberation than the self advanced saints and he also said that the saints are like bees taking nectar from different sources while the incarnations come for special mission > > I attended one of the lectures by mata amritanandamayi where she said that suffering can be relieved by offering worship to planets > > If I worship the divine mother I need not worship even the Trinity gods ( as quoted from soundaryalahiri) who preside over the planets > > So I dont believe if holy people convey to there followers to worship the planets > > regards > vikram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 I am replying to Vikram: yes the idea is good; but worship is not "pretending to worship" or mistakenly believe that you are worshipping. It is real worship. Just mumbling a few bIjas is not worship. Throwing a few flowers is not worship. Worship has to be with body mind and soul. If you can do that then you need nothing. But most ppl, including me, only TRY to worship. So the ideal system oes not otain for us. So for us advice of saints like amritanandamayi are needed. And we need to worship other Gods as well and propitiate planets. If you think ou are so advanced as ppl like amritanandamayi then u need nothing. U need not even worship HER. Because u are HER. In such a situation everything is under your control - the whole universe. Is that the case, Vikram? Mary Ann <buttercookie61 wrote: Actually I was kind of joking in what I said, mentioning Jesus, etc. I was thinking about it later. Why does God allow volcanic eruptions that decimate villages? Why earthquakes that kill thousands, etc. etc. etc. It's not an answerable question, and that's why I was offering it to the Xtian Fundamentalists who always have the most sensible answers , vikram vanam <vikram_vanam2005> wrote: > but we must also remember from the life of Sri Ramakrishna paramahamsa that he said to one of his disciples that he had come down as Jesus christ and he also had come down as Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu > > Although I appreciate that to consider one guru as near to jesus christ is good for progress but so far I dare say that the christians have not deciphered the bible as the hindu mystics have done and as Sri ramakrishna said that when such incarnations of God come they take back people more in number ie liberation than the self advanced saints and he also said that the saints are like bees taking nectar from different sources while the incarnations come for special mission > > I attended one of the lectures by mata amritanandamayi where she said that suffering can be relieved by offering worship to planets > > If I worship the divine mother I need not worship even the Trinity gods ( as quoted from soundaryalahiri) who preside over the planets > > So I dont believe if holy people convey to there followers to worship the planets > > regards > vikram Beliefs of hinduism Independence day Traditions Divine Hinduism Visit your group "" on the web. Start your day with - make it your home page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 One thing I have read that Amma said about "the planets" is that horoscope is not set in stone, that sadhana can change it. I don't know how that relates to worshiping planets, but I wanted to offer it here. , sankara menon <kochu1tz> wrote: > I am replying to Vikram: > > yes the idea is good; but worship is not "pretending to worship" or mistakenly believe that you are worshipping. It is real worship. Just mumbling a few bIjas is not worship. Throwing a few flowers is not worship. Worship has to be with body mind and soul. If you can do that then you need nothing. > But most ppl, including me, only TRY to worship. So the ideal system oes not otain for us. So for us advice of saints like amritanandamayi are needed. And we need to worship other Gods as well and propitiate planets. > If you think ou are so advanced as ppl like amritanandamayi then u need nothing. U need not even worship HER. Because u are HER. In such a situation everything is under your control - the whole universe. > Is that the case, Vikram? > > Mary Ann <buttercookie61> wrote: > Actually I was kind of joking in what I said, mentioning Jesus, etc. I was thinking about it later. Why does God allow volcanic eruptions that decimate villages? Why earthquakes that kill thousands, etc. etc. etc. It's not an answerable question, and that's why I was offering it to the Xtian Fundamentalists who always have the most > sensible answers > > , vikram vanam > <vikram_vanam2005> wrote: > > but we must also remember from the life of Sri Ramakrishna > paramahamsa that he said to one of his disciples that he had come down as Jesus christ and he also had come down as Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu > > > > Although I appreciate that to consider one guru as near to jesus christ is good for progress but so far I dare say that the christians have not deciphered the bible as the hindu mystics have done and as Sri ramakrishna said that when such incarnations of God come they take back people more in number ie liberation than the self advanced saints and he also said that the saints are like bees taking nectar from different sources while the incarnations come for special mission > > > > I attended one of the lectures by mata amritanandamayi where she said that suffering can be relieved by offering worship to planets > > > > If I worship the divine mother I need not worship even the Trinity gods ( as quoted from soundaryalahiri) who preside over the planets > > > > So I dont believe if holy people convey to there followers to worship the planets > > > > regards > > vikram > > > > > > Beliefs of hinduism Independence day Traditions Divine Hinduism > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > Start your day with - make it your home page > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 manoj_menon wrote: if you insist on judging representatives, then I would very tentatively suggest that you look up to the orange-robed swamis and swaminis; they are the real fruits of Amma's labor. And without any questions, look at Amma herself. Exactly that is what ive been doing all these years. I look at Amma's most of the time. Rather difficult from near because often being block by the yellow robe swamis and other representatives. So I decided to stay far away where I can get better view of just her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.