Is this true?

[Guest guest]

Saudi royals destroying home of Muhammad

 

In Bharat, secular government has destroyed many temples for widening roads and

for many other reasons. But government has never touched mosques, which are

obstructing in the movement of vehicles or even people. Government does not

touch even those mosques, constructed illegally on lands even which do not

belong to them. But look what is happening to mosques in Saudi Arabia which is

the birth place of Islam. (In the past Organiser has published many articles on

this topic)

 

TAREK FATAH

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_T\

ype1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=1124187827096&DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&tac\

odalogin=yes

Something is rotten in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. But let me come back to that

later.

 

In December 1992 a mob of 150,000 Hindu nationalists attacked a 15th-century

mosque in the Indian city of Ayodhya. Within hours, the mosque was reduced to

rubble and in the weeks to follow, thousands of Indians died in Hindu-Muslim

riots.

 

The Muslim world reacted in outrage. Among the countries that expressed anger at

the destruction of the centuries-old Indian mosque by Hindu extremists was Saudi

Arabia. Here in Canada, imams gave fiery sermons and urged congregations to

protest.

 

Although more than a dozen years have passed since the destruction of the

mosque, there is still bitterness in the air. Muslims worldwide feel a sense of

betrayal and impotence at not being able to control their own destiny and

protect their historical religious sites.

 

However, a Muslim site far more significant than the Babri mosque is facing

destruction, but there is barely a murmur in protest. The site is none other

than the home of Prophet Muhammad in the city of Mecca.

 

The demolition of Muhammad's 1,400-year-old home is not going to take place at

the hands of non-Muslims or some occupying western army, but by the very people

who have taken the title as protectors of Islam's two holiest mosques in Medina

and Mecca: the Saudi royal family.

 

What makes this demolition worse is the fact that the home of the Prophet is to

make way for a parking lot, two 50-storey hotel towers and seven 35-storey

apartment blocks; a project known as the Jabal Omar Scheme, all within a stone's

throw of the Grand Mosque.

 

Yet despite this outrage, not a single Muslim country, no ayatollah, no mufti,

no king, not even a Muslim Canadian imam has dared utter a word in protest.

 

Such is the power of Saudi influence on the Muslim narrative.

 

The question is this: Why is it that when the Babri mosque was demolished,

hundreds of thousands of Muslims worldwide took to the streets to protest, but

when Saudi authorities plan to demolish the home of our beloved Prophet, not a

whisper is heard?

 

Is it because Muslims have become so overwhelmed by the power of the Saudi riyal

currency that we have lost all courage and self-respect? Or is it because we

feel a need to cover up Muslim-on-Muslim violence; Muslim-on-Muslim terror;

Muslim-on-Muslim oppression?

 

However, in this climate conducive to cowardice, there still are a few giants

that stand tall. Dr. Sámi Angawi is one of them.

 

An eminent Saudi architect, he is a brave man in a country where courage is

scarce. Today, he leads a one-man campaign to save the home of Muhammad.

 

He told the London newspaper, The Independent, "The house where the Prophet

received the word of God is gone and nobody cares ... this is the end of history

in Mecca and Medina and the end of their future."

 

The cultural massacre of Islamic heritage sites is not a new phenomenon. It is

said that in the last two decades, 95 per cent of Mecca's 1,000-year-old

buildings have been demolished. In the early 1920s, the Saudis bulldozed and

leveled a graveyard in Medina that housed the graves of the family and

companions of Muhammad.

 

Today, the religious zealots in Saudi Arabia are not alone. Commercial

developers have joined hands with them and are making hundreds of millions in

profits as they build ugly, but lucrative high-rises that are shadowing the

Grand Mosque know as the Kaaba.

 

The Muslim Canadian Congress has strongly condemned this outrage and called it a

cultural massacre of Muslim heritage for the sake of profit. In a letter to the

Saudi ambassador in Ottawa, Niaz Salimi, president of the MCC, has demanded an

immediate stop to these demolitions and the placing of a moratorium on all

future destruction of Muslim heritage sites.

 

She writes, "The sacred places of Islam, regardless of where they are located,

belong to the Muslim community worldwide. The countries where they are located

are simply trustees and have no right to destroy them."

 

Today Saudi petrodollars have the ability to silence even its most vocal

critics, but when all is said and done, history will render a harsh judgment on

those who try to wipe out its footprints and steal the heritage of all humanity.

 

In the words of Lady Macbeth,

 

Here's the smell of blood still:

 

All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand.

 

Oh! oh! oh!

 

Tarek Fatah is a founding member of the Muslim Canadian Congress and host of the

weekly TV show, The Muslim Chronicle

 

-----------

 

Ideas On ignoring history

By V.S. Naipaul

 

On demolition of Babri structure

 

“Not as badly as the others did, I am afraid. The people who say that there was

no temple are missing the point. Babar, you must understand, had contempt for

the country he had conquered. And his building of that mosque was an act of

contempt. In Ayodhya, the construction of a mosque on a spot regarded as sacred

by the conquered population was meant as an insult to an ancient idea, the idea

of Ram, which was two or three thousand years old.” (The Times of India, July

18, 1993).

On the attire of the people who demolished Babri structure

“One needs to understand the passion that took them on top of the domes. The

jeans and the T-shirts are superficial. The passion alone is real. You can’t

dismiss it. You have to try to harness it. Hitherto in India, the thinking has

come from the top. What is happening now is different. The movement is from

below.” (The Times of India, July 18, 1993).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mail

Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour