Guest guest Posted October 6, 2005 Report Share Posted October 6, 2005 ------------------------------- The real issue is about Ojus, not sex. Here both brahmacharis and tantrics have the same belief. the difference is brahmacharis reject sex alltogether ,where as some neo tantric try to "eat the cake and have it too". it leads to perversion. that give rise to some kind of writings,poetry etc. Everything written in sanskrit need not be sacred. Prasad , "childofdevi" <childofdevi > wrote: > Hi Arjuna, > > Once again refrainment from sex is advised more as means to conserve > vitality than for any moral reason. If you can conserve vitality, > there is no reason to refrain from sex even as per the yoga classics. > > If you read the works of Swami Sivananda and Swami Satyananda, there > are numerous hints at the practice of vajroli. A sincere practitioner > can achieve success in vajroli based on these hints(nowhere else will > you find these hints). This is my gift to you :-). > > It is for this reason why the Kularnava has stated that one has to > practice astanga yoga in the graveyard, prior to becoming a kaula. > Rather than taking it at face value, I think it means that certain > yogic practices are necessarily for many kaula rituals... > > -yogaman > > > , "Arjuna Taranandanatha" > <bhagatirtha@m...> wrote: > > , "childofdevi" > <childofdevi > > > So why did Sivananda prescribe brahmacharya for most - because > most > > > people were sex addicts, so this was his way of telling that they > > must develop self control. > > > > Once again, this kind of prescription is against dharma of Vedas > and > > smriti (i leave Tantras aside for Ur sake). > > > > Thus he was preaching adharma - whatever "good" reasons given it > > doesn't change the fact. > > > > Krishna had said in Gita, that it is better to follow one's own > dharma > > imperfectly than to follow some other's perfectly. It is foolish > for > > grihasthi to take vows of sannyasi or conduct of brahmachari. This > is > > what healthy hinduism and any other normal religion teaches. > > > > U see, people speculate around vedanta and gita etc, but simple and > > clear teachings are left aside and their place is taken by strange > > diversions... > > > > A. > > ===================================== > > MY DEAR ARJUNA!! > > TANRA IS NO THE ONL PATH. THERE ARE OTHJER PATHS FOR WHI CELIBAC > AND CONTROL ARE PRE-REQUESITES. LETS NO DENIGRATE OTHER PATHS. JST > SAY IN MY PATH THIS IS SO. SARWA DHARMAANINDA IS ANOTHER APHISM OF > PARASHURAMA. LETS FOLLOW THAT??? > > ==================================================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.