Guest guest Posted October 7, 2005 Report Share Posted October 7, 2005 Dear All: I think all of us have said enough on this. Shall we stop? for Good Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2005 Report Share Posted October 7, 2005 Greetings, all. (93/333/696, Arjuna) I am a long time lurker here, and greatly respect those who post here the very authoritative information. I hope that what I say now will not diffuse the ongoing discussion. If you deem it does, my sincere apologies. My perspective is somewhat unique, and I believe it resonates with this particular thread. First a little intro of me - I have studied Crowley and other western tradition occultists quite thoroughly for about 35 years, and have studied Eastern traditions for about 30 years. The motivation for my study was that, when I attained puberty, I realized that I was quite psychic (particularly telepathy) and had a spontaneous kundalini awakening which enabled me to "do stuff" which I had no explanation for or context at the time. It disturbed me greatly that I could "do stuff" that, in my reading and research, apparently most others strived a lifetime to achieve. So, my process was a bit backwards (still is, haha), in that I am continually finding descriptions of "stuff" that I do that helps me to understand what context others have for it. I spent the greater part of my teens learning how to control myself so as to not adversely affect myself or others through lack of discipline. When I was 19, I devoted myself to Her, and have received instructions and guidance as visions, omens and whatnot, since. A few years ago, I decided to take some time to ask the question (again) "why can I do all this *stuff*?" ... and began a very intense period of instruction from Her, which took me deeply into an extended (and still ongoing) Working which you might call of a "white tantra" nature. (By the way, I have been mostly physically celibate for about 25 years or so, not for any particular reason, just seemed to work for me at the time, still does.) I encountered a fellow online with whom I connect telepathically (for the first several months, we also communicated by email, but now it is all psychic) in meditation on a regular basis. (I meditate an hour or two a day ... usually starting with a chakra balancing thingy, and then "pulling down" into me the brightness of Her, and going from there.) Well. This connection with the fellow, whom I call my Twin (later, I found other references to this term, which was quite surprising to me) was/is ecstatic ... well, that's an understatement. It is as if time and space are meaningless when we meet in meditation. Unbelievable sensation/communion/bliss. There have been times where we have connected for hours, and I would say it is the best "sex" I've ever had. It is as if, as we link, chakra by chakra and then all at once, each thought is orgasmic. I learned how to do this through praying to Her for guidance and instruction. The thought/methods would reveal themselves to me, and then we did these things. Since then, I have communed with others, both men and women, and have been able to show them (again, telepathically) how the Flow is ... my understanding from cross referencing this is that this is akin to what y'all might call "channeling shaktipat". So, my point in posting, is that "sex" does not require physical contact (though I would note that the telepathic journeys I take have VERY real physical, um, outcomes). It disturbs me somewhat that the illusion of the separateness implied by the meatsack body is characterizing the debate of whether "sex" is an appropriate topic with respect to Shakti. To me, each breath in meditation brings ecstacy - I cannot see how this is in anyway a bad thing! A couple of practical observations (I don't know if they are generalizable but they are consistent with me, anyways) ... I have found that the time of my greatest psychic receptivity is when ovulating ... and would suggest to any woman seeking the path of tantra to avoid hormonal therapies like birth control pills. I also have found that periods of extreme solar/magnetic activity (lots of sunspots and stuff) make psychic communication/communion more difficult. The old Gaelic literal translation of "I love you" is "I'm other you". To me, this is an apt summary of Ardhanarishavara. Well, I think I've said enough, and hope I've not said too much! I pray I've not offended any with my remarks; they are intended only to represent my point of view and nothing more. Namaste, Nina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2005 Report Share Posted October 8, 2005 .. > >, I have been mostly physically celibate for about 25 years or so, not >for any particular reason, just seemed to work for me at the time, still >does.) > >Well. This connection with the fellow, whom I call my Twin (later, I found >other references to this term, which was quite surprising to me) was/is >ecstatic ... well, that's an understatement. It is as if time and space >are >meaningless when we meet in meditation. Unbelievable >sensation/communion/bliss. There have been times where we have connected >for hours, and I would say it is the best "sex" I've ever had. It is as >if, >as we link, chakra by chakra and then all at once, each thought is >orgasmic. >I learned how to do this through praying to Her for guidance and >instruction. The thought/methods would reveal themselves to me, and then >we >did these things. > >Since then, I have communed with others, both men and women, and have been >able to show them (again, telepathically) how the Flow is ... my >understanding from cross referencing this is that this is akin to what >y'all >might call "channeling shaktipat". > I AM WRITING IN BOLD LETTERS: ARE YOU OR WHERE YOU EVER MARRIED PHYSICALLY TO YOUR OPPOSITE SEX? iF SO, HOW YOUR PARTNER HANDLE RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU? yOU MAY BE PHYSICALLY CELIBATE, Yet, you are ENJOING UNION IN OTHER FORM. Is this justified? Is this what all spritually evolved people are after? Samadhi, ectasy all are nothing but sexual orgasm. Since, you talk of orgasm, I presume that you are or were married at some stage, if not, atleast must have had some serious relationship. I am not against sex or orgasm - My question is, How other partner handle ,when one partner is engaged is spiritual orgasm while other is not? In normal life, this sort of action can break the soul of opposite sex and cause lot of pain. raji Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2005 Report Share Posted October 8, 2005 , "rajeshwari iyer" <rajii31@h...> wrote: > I AM WRITING IN BOLD LETTERS: ARE YOU OR WHERE YOU EVER MARRIED PHYSICALLY > TO YOUR OPPOSITE SEX? No. I have had several long term relationships, but have never chosen to be defined by others into a particular role, such as that which is defined as "wifegirlfriend" or whatnot. > > iF SO, HOW YOUR PARTNER HANDLE RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU? I am in a long term relationship, now. It is tough for him, sometimes, but he knows I have always been very involved in "occult practices". His mother was a native American shaman, so it is not beyond his realm of understanding. There was a time, many years ago, where we did have physical sex (note - I'd said "mostly" in my previous posting), I used it to heal him ... now I heal by providing a lovely, serene and secure environment for us to live in. He is uncomfortable with what one might call generally the "invisible world" (I have many types of dealings with noncorporal beings) .. so we have sort of a "don't ask, don't tell" policy. It helps also that I am an extremely good cook > > yOU MAY BE PHYSICALLY CELIBATE, Yet, you are ENJOING UNION IN OTHER FORM. Is > this justified? Why should I not enjoy my meditations? Also, I'd like to note that, while the first seven years were an intended discipline (actually, I disallowed ANY physical contact of ANY kind, even the most casual) the balance of the time has just been going with the flow Who knows, this afternoon circumstances might point me another direction! > > Is this what all spritually evolved people are after? Samadhi, ectasy all > are nothing but sexual orgasm. I have no idea what "all spiritually evolved people are after" ... I find that it is a very fun and productive way to deepen a meditation, by balancing breath and flow and ecstacy ... and it allows me to open further, in the same way as physical excitement in sex induces a deeper embrace. > > Since, you talk of orgasm, I presume that you are or were married at some > stage, if not, atleast must have had some serious relationship. Never married, never had a traditional relationship of any kind, but yes, I am quite experienced in the physical arena, if that's what you're asking. > > I am not against sex or orgasm - My question is, How other partner handle > ,when one partner is engaged is spiritual orgasm while other is not? In > normal life, this sort of action can break the soul of opposite sex and > cause lot of pain. It is not an easy path, but what is? And, as I mentioned above, that just happens to be the way it is this morning I would not restrict any possibilities, I just mentioned the celibacy thing as it seemed to be part of the issues being discussed and therefore perhaps relevant to my point of view. Namaste, Nina raji > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.