Guest guest Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 Namaste- As a practicing Wiccan, who has been heavily influenced by Hinduism (I call myself a Shakta Witch), I can say that it doesn't surprise me that there are similarities. As Wicca, as it now stands, was really founded in the 1940's after the occult revival of the 1800's, where much Eastern knowledge was made available to Westerns, and from which it drew much of it's ritual framework. However, if you take the train of thought that Wicca was also drawing from older oral sources (as I believe also contributed to it, although it was certainly not the only, or even the main contributing factor) from the Celtic traditions, an interesting correlation can still be drawn, as the Indo-Aryans are believed to have inhabited the UK....especially Ireland. There many linguistic similarities between sanskrit and ancient Irish dialects. That is not to say that Hinduism made it intact to Ireland somehow, but elements may very well have travelled. It is a facinating line of study. ~D~ (Yes!! Hinduism travelled west and not vice versa. The original gypsies were shaiva evangelists travelling west to convert the people of the west to shaivism)==> Moderator Personals Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. Lots of someones, actually. Personals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 I did not know that the East wanted to claim conversion as part of their way of teaching. It's refreshing to see it acknowledged openly here by the Moderator's note. , ~Devi~ <prana_devi> wrote: > > Namaste- > > As a practicing Wiccan, who has been heavily influenced by Hinduism (I call myself a Shakta Witch), I can say that it doesn't surprise me that there are similarities. As Wicca, as it now stands, was really founded in the 1940's after the occult revival of the 1800's, where much Eastern knowledge was made available to Westerns, and from which it drew much of it's ritual framework. > > However, if you take the train of thought that Wicca was also drawing from older oral sources (as I believe also contributed to it, although it was certainly not the only, or even the main contributing factor) from the Celtic traditions, an interesting correlation can still be drawn, as the Indo-Aryans are believed to have inhabited the UK....especially Ireland. There many linguistic similarities between sanskrit and ancient Irish dialects. That is not to say that Hinduism made it intact to Ireland somehow, but elements may very well have travelled. > > It is a facinating line of study. > > ~D~ > (Yes!! Hinduism travelled west and not vice versa. The original gypsies were shaiva evangelists travelling west to convert the people of the west to shaivism)==> Moderator > > > Personals > Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet. > Lots of someones, actually. Personals > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2005 Report Share Posted December 4, 2005 , ~Devi~ <prana_devi> wrote: > Prana Devi wrote: > [....] > Wicca, as it now stands, was really > founded in the 1940's after the occult revival > of the 1800's, [....] Yes. Wicca draws very heavily on the Western esoteric sources and tradtions. While the Victorian ceremonial magicians (and members of other secret societies) did have some access to eastern traditions, it seems to me that they drew more heavily from the more-or-less "classical" Western sources--Greek, Roman, Jewish/Kabbala/Hebraic and so on. The prominent use of "the five elements" in Wicca most likely has an indirect connection to Hinduism/India. It's probably *primarily* an adoption from the Greek system, which in turn, is most likely a borrowing from Hinduism. My theory, anyway. By the way, Linda Johnsen has a book coming out in 2006 on "the ancient Greek sages and their connection with India." Should be interesting! From my reading of Linda's previous work, I expect this book will detail the east-to-west flow of ideas. Since Wicca developed in Great Britain, it was also strongly influenced (as Prana Devi points out) by then-current understanding of Celtic mythology and traditional customs. > if you take the train of thought that > Wicca was also drawing from older oral > sources ([...] not the only, or even the > main contributing factor)[...] > Indo-Aryans are believed to have inhabited the UK. > [....] A friend of mine says there are even more striking similarities between Icelandic myths/sagas and traditional Hindu stories. As he understands it, these could be traces of Proto-Indo-European diffusion of culture and language. Wikipedia has some pretty decent short summaries of the current (i.e. peaceful diffusion) theories regarding PIE language and culture. >From Wikipedia: The Proto-Indo-Europeans are the hypothetical speakers of the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language, a prehistoric people of the late Neolithic and early Bronze Age. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-Europeans The Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) is the hypothetical common ancestor of the Indo-European languages. The existence of such a language is generally accepted by linguists, though there has been debate about many specific details. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language On the history of Wicca: The following article from the Atlantic does a reasonably good job of summarizing the history/chronology of Wicca. Unfortunately, it suffers from a rather rude tone, misrepresents Starhawk, and so on. I am very amused by the author's contention that a pantheon can't contain both multiple goddess forms AND the concept/reality of the Great Goddess. http://www.belili.org/allen.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 You don't need to convert to Hinduism. There is no common ritual like baptism. Can the Moderator please explain from where he concluded "shiva evangalists" travelling west ! Swami Vivekananda was, in recent times the first Indian swami across the seven seas, followed by Yogananda, followed by Swami Rama, Osho and others. Other than sincerity, there is no predefined path to God/Moksha/Nirvana/Rishihood/Sainhood/Mahaparinirvana/et all. Let's say at best the 'Hindu attitude' is allowing and if possible supporting an individuals 'Realisation' of what they seek. So the question of converting from Christ to Shiva is non essential, because ultimately both are forms of 'God'. A barfi is as sweet as a Mars bar, depends which you like. Wicca the way of the wise is another path to 'be'. The rules are the same as in Tantra/Aghor - 'Blessed Be" and 'The Rule of Three'.. Why be confused with "cuisine'. None is superior. Narda Muni's Ashram was at the Niagra Falls, Dhronacharaya's at the source of the Danube in Germany, and Anajeya's (Anuman's) in Trinidad & Tobago. India does not hold spiritual superiority, and if we do claim it, then again it is due to all other races and peoples who were kind enough to bestow it on us. Some of the best spiritual insights have travelled West due to experiencers like Svoboda and Sir John Woodroffe, and organisations like the Theosophical Society. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.