Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

An Article..

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Pranam. An article from another group... Ur comments, pls.

 

With Love

 

Shankaree

 

*White, Slav and a steadfast Hindu*

RASHMEE ROSHAN LALL

*[ **Friday, December 30, 2005** **08:53:44 pm* *TIMES NEWS NETWORK ]*

 

* *

 

LONDON: Thirty-five years after a fateful clandestine meeting in Moscow

between ISKCON founder Swami Prabhupada and a young white Russian who was to

receive the dangerously secret gift of a banned Bhagvad Gita, take the name

Ananda Shanti Das, and build from scratch a 100,000-strong community of

native Krishna bhakts, the Slavonic Hindu may be emerging as the 21st

century's most potent symbol of too-successfully spreading the word beyond

Indian shores.

 

A gathering campaign by British parliamentarians is set to tell an

astonished world that Russia's Hindus – white, Slav and steadfast in their

faith – are living symbols of state oppression in a country counted as one

of the world's eight most advanced and industrialised economies.

 

The campaign in the British parliament, led by UK Indian Labour Party MP

Ashok Kumar and spearheaded by the umbrella Hindu Forum of Britain (HFB),

will claim that Russian Hindus continue to be denied the right to build a

temple and have been left without electricity, heating and water in their

freezing makeshift Moscow temple.

 

 

 

The campaign is set to unveil a devastating saga spanning nearly four

decades in which Russian Hindus are alleged to have been variously vilified

by the Soviet state, the Russian Orthodox church, Russian Islamist and

Jewish leaders and far-right nationalist politicians such as Vladimir

Zhirinovsky.

 

The British campaign is to be kickstarted when Yuri Luzhkov, mayor of

Moscowand allegedly Slavic Hinduism's most implacable foe, arrives in

London early next month.

 

So far, there has been no official response to the allegations from

Luzhkov's office or President Vladimir Putin's government.

 

But the new campaign, which aims to harness the collective might of British

and European political, press and public opinion to recall Moscow to a sense

of its human rights obligations, is thought to be dangerously poised to undo

Russia's attempts to gain global legitimacy even as it controversially takes

over presidency of the G8.

 

 

 

The British campaign, which is bolstered by European and Australian Hindu

organisations, comes exactly 25 years after the then deputy KGB chief Semen

Tsvigun first exhorted the Soviet Union to recognise and stamp on the three

greatest threats to the state – "Western culture, rock and roll and Krishna".

 

 

Commentators and academics, including Edwin Bacon of Birmingham University's

Centre for Russian and East European Studies, say the Russian campaign

against the indigenous spread of Hinduism is part of a " broad line taken by

the state certainly since the mid-1990s ... of encouraging 'traditional'

religions, especially Russian Orthodoxy, whilst putting in place

restrictions on other groups deemed non-traditional".

 

So great was the Russian sense of threat that a 1994 council of Russian

Orthodox bishops warned that "the teachings of the Bhagvad Gita are a false

religion" and that "neo-pagan, pseudo-Christian, occultist faiths (such as

Hinduism) are a threat to the unity of national consciousness and cultural

identity of Russia".

 

 

 

The British campaign, which is bolstered by European and Australian Hindu

organisations, comes exactly 25 years after the then deputy KGB chief Semen

Tsvigun first exhorted the Soviet Union to recognise and stamp on the three

greatest threats to the state – "Western culture, rock and roll and Krishna".

 

 

Commentators and academics, including Edwin Bacon of Birmingham University's

Centre for Russian and East European Studies, say the Russian campaign

against the indigenous spread of Hinduism is part of a " broad line taken by

the state certainly since the mid-1990s ... of encouraging 'traditional'

religions, especially Russian Orthodoxy, whilst putting in place

restrictions on other groups deemed non-traditional".

 

So great was the Russian sense of threat that a 1994 council of Russian

Orthodox bishops warned that "the teachings of the Bhagvad Gita are a false

religion" and that "neo-pagan, pseudo-Christian, occultist faiths (such as

Hinduism) are a threat to the unity of national consciousness and cultural

identity of Russia".

 

 

 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1353212,curpg-4.cms

 

 

 

 

Let my every word be a prayer to Thee,

Every movement of my hands a ritual gesture to Thee,

Every step I take a circumambulation of Thy image,

Every morsel I eat a rite of sacrifice to Thee,

Every time I lay down a prostration at Thy feet;

Every act of personal pleasure and all else that I do,

Let it all be a form of worshiping Thee."

>From Verse 27 of Shri Aadi Shankara's Saundaryalahari

 

 

 

 

CarsNEW - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online

search now

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, shankaree ramatas

<shankaree> wrote:

>

> Pranam. An article from another group... Ur comments, pls.

 

Shankaree,

 

Check out this article:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/2005/Dec/06/5983_1566453,00430005.htm

 

I note two facts - these articles are not being carried by mainstream

British or US news wires. So, where is the corroboration of these

allegations?

 

The article in hindustantimes names the particular archbishop of

Russian Orthodox church who is referring to Lord Krishna as Satan.

 

Love,

Felicia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Felicia said "I note two facts - these articles are not being carried by

mainstream British or US news wires. So, where is the corroboration of these

allegations?" ---

 

So?? A news report in Hindustan Times is acceptable only when it is

corroborated by '"mainstream" British and American papers'?? Are they the

ultimate arbiters of what is true and what is not?

 

As far as I know the British and American "mainstream" press are backers of

all sorts of western propaganda to further western interests. They mix truth and

fiction as they deem necessary. In order to shore up the credibility, they

sometimes they criticize the west and bring verifiable stories also. That’s all

part of the propaganda apparatchik.

 

I have found this slanted racist attitude everywhere from London Times BBC and

whatnot. Look at CNN and its "embedded" reporters like amanpour and others -

pure propagandists who have been built up by CNN to pass on US propaganda in

Iraq. I will not believe one word of what they say. I would rather see the

scenes and draw my own conclusions - however censored the scenes are. Thats your

idea of "free press"?

 

I make it clear that Indian Press is far more free than the so called “western

free press” which is but an arm of western interests.

 

Felicia <hygeiea44 wrote:

, shankaree ramatas

<shankaree> wrote:

> Pranam. An article from another group... Ur comments, pls.

 

Shankaree,

 

Check out this article:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/2005/Dec/06/5983_1566453,00430005.htm

 

I note two facts - these articles are not being carried by mainstream British or

US news wires. So, where is the corroboration of these allegations?

 

The article in Hindustan times names the particular archbishop ofRussian

Orthodox church who is referring to Lord Krishna as Satan.

 

Love,

Felicia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photos

Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays,

whatever.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fear makes me irrational. God give me eyes to SEE !

 

Felicia <hygeiea44 wrote: --- In

, shankaree ramatas

<shankaree> wrote:

>

> Pranam. An article from another group... Ur comments, pls.

 

Shankaree,

 

Check out this article:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/2005/Dec/06/5983_1566453,00430005.htm

 

I note two facts - these articles are not being carried by mainstream

British or US news wires. So, where is the corroboration of these

allegations?

 

The article in hindustantimes names the particular archbishop of

Russian Orthodox church who is referring to Lord Krishna as Satan.

 

Love,

Felicia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...