Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 Dear all: Eve the aricle referenced by Felicia is part of the christian evangelistmovement to "save" India. wrote whats below even fefore I read the ari\tilcle. But I now notice that it is by an unnamed author, from the "UK Beureau". What gives awa the ethenicity and intent and purport of the article is the paragraph "In contrast to the Russian Orthodox Church's stance, Hindus respect Jesus Christ, who is predicted in the Vedas, the ancient Hindu scriptures, as a specifically empowered personality." The first few paragraphs will get the attentio of the hindus then the Gobbelsian westernn trick by adding the above quoted paragraph. Thisis untrue and a lot of hogwash thats being propagated by the evangelists to reduce resistence to conversion!! Actually this illustrated what i said in the original reply. Plantng a false idea and then letting it grow. You expect us to believe such artiles?? It is obviosly penned at the instance of evangelists by an evangelist ot a paid off scribe. sankara menon <kochu1tz wrote: Felicia said "I note two facts - these articles are not being carried by mainstream British or US news wires. So, where is the corroboration of these allegations?" --- So?? A news report in Hindustan Times is acceptable only when it is corroborated by '"mainstream" British and American papers'?? Are they the ultimate arbiters of what is true and what is not? As far as I know the British and American "mainstream" press are backers of all sorts of western propaganda to further western interests. They mix truth and fiction as they deem necessary. In order to shore up the credibility, they sometimes they criticize the west and bring verifiable stories also. That’s all part of the propaganda apparatchik. I have found this slanted racist attitude everywhere from London Times BBC and whatnot. Look at CNN and its "embedded" reporters like amanpour and others - pure propagandists who have been built up by CNN to pass on US propaganda in Iraq. I will not believe one word of what they say. I would rather see the scenes and draw my own conclusions - however censored the scenes are. Thats your idea of "free press"? I make it clear that Indian Press is far more free than the so called “western free press” which is but an arm of western interests. Felicia <hygeiea44 wrote: , shankaree ramatas <shankaree> wrote: > Pranam. An article from another group... Ur comments, pls. Shankaree, Check out this article: http://www.hindustantimes.com/2005/Dec/06/5983_1566453,00430005.htm I note two facts - these articles are not being carried by mainstream British or US news wires. So, where is the corroboration of these allegations? The article in Hindustan times names the particular archbishop ofRussian Orthodox church who is referring to Lord Krishna as Satan. Love, Felicia Photos Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. Devi Traditions Divine Visit your group "" on the web. DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.